AirTalk.org Forum Index AirTalk.org
Aviation discussions newsgroups
 
Archives   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

RYANAIR CALLS ON REGULATOR TO REJECT £2.2bn TA J MAHAL AT

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AirTalk.org Forum Index -> Humberside Airport
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Jim Mason
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 9:02 pm    Post subject: RYANAIR CALLS ON REGULATOR TO REJECT £2.2bn TA J MAHAL AT Reply with quote



RYANAIR CALLS ON REGULATOR TO REJECT £2.2bn “TAJ MAHAL” AT STANSTED


News Release
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----

30.01.07
RYANAIR CALLS ON REGULATOR TO REJECT £2.2bn “TAJ MAHAL” AT STANSTED


Ryanair, which is Stansted’s largest airline customer (with over 60% of its
traffic) today (Tuesday, 30th January 2007) called upon the Civil Aviation
Authority – the regulator of the BAA airport monopoly – to reject the
£2.2bn. Taj Mahal planned by BAA Stansted for the second runway and
terminal at the airport.

Ryanair and the other airline users at Stansted are opposed to this gold
plated design. The airlines believe that the second runway and terminal can
and should be built for less than £1bn, less than half the BAA monopoly’s
figure. The airlines’ plan would also require just 200 hectares of Essex
countryside, thereby reducing by more than 50% the unnecessary land grab
proposed by the BAA.

Commenting on these plans this morning, Ryanair’s CEO, Michael O’Leary,
said:

“This £2.2bn Taj Mahal is opposed by Stansted’s airlines, its passengers
and the local community. This will lead to a doubling of the already high
passenger charges at Stansted and will be a double whammy for British
passengers and visitors on top of greedy Gordon Brown’s £10 airport tax,
which starts on Thursday. The second runway and terminal plans submitted
by the airlines would cost less than half the monies proposed by the BAA
monopoly and do away with an increase in passenger charges.

“At a time when a low cost efficient airport like Frankfurt Hahn can design
and build a 15M passenger terminal for less than €100m, there is no
justification for the BAA airport monopoly to waste £1.4bn. on a similar
sized terminal facility. These figures show that the BAA airport monopoly
wastes money building gold plated Taj Mahals that its airlines don’t want
and its passengers don’t need.

“Its about time that the Civil Aviation Authority, which is supposed to
regulate the BAA monopoly, in the interests of its users put a stop to this
waste and overspending and forced the BAA Stansted to build facilities
which the airline customers want and its passengers will use. This
morning’s confirmation that BAA Stansted intends to push through this badly
designed Taj Mahal despite the opposition of its airline users provides
further support to the widespread calls for this out of control airport
monopoly to be broken up and allow competition to deliver where a regulated
monopoly has clearly failed.

“Ryanair will oppose these plans during the planning process and if
necessary in the courts. We have no intention of allowing this greedy
monopoly to double passenger charges and hike up the cost of air travel at
Stansted”.



--
Remove `spamtrapped` to reply off-list

http://jim-mason.fotopic.net/
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AirTalk.org Forum Index -> Humberside Airport All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2006 phpBB Group
SEO toolkit © 2004-2006 webmedic.