AirTalk.org Forum Index AirTalk.org
Aviation discussions newsgroups
 
Archives   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

GSM - is it time to shut them down ?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AirTalk.org Forum Index -> Edinburgh Airport
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Guest






PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2007 2:21 pm    Post subject: GSM - is it time to shut them down ? Reply with quote



Pains me to suggest this , but a once fine airline has been ruined by
haphazard and reckless expansion - e N America flights are a joke ,
how long will pax put up with this ? The short haul seem to suffer
almost daily tech delays and ridiculously short turnround times . The
airline quality forums are embarrasing to read . Time for the CAA to
step in ?
Back to top
John Dundas
Guest





PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2007 2:38 pm    Post subject: Re: GSM - is it time to shut them down ? Reply with quote



<snowak (AT) scotprint (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message
news:1178961705.598635.249730 (AT) u30g2000hsc (DOT) googlegroups.com...
Quote:
Pains me to suggest this , but a once fine airline has been ruined
by
haphazard and reckless expansion - e N America flights are a joke ,
how long will pax put up with this ? The short haul seem to suffer
almost daily tech delays and ridiculously short turnround times .
The
airline quality forums are embarrasing to read . Time for the CAA to
step in ?


Hi
No its not time for the CAA to step in or for the airline to be
shutdown, its time that the Management got a rocket up their backside
and this can be done in other ways, calling in the CAA is just going
to cause them more problems.

I think folk should make sure that the airlines knows how much folk
are hacked off with them, then again look at FR, a lot of folk are
unhappy with them but they are still doing well.

They are trying too grow too quickly for some silly reason and now its
showing, some folk said this would be the outcome.
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2007 2:45 pm    Post subject: Re: GSM - is it time to shut them down ? Reply with quote



John Dundas removethisnow wrote:
Quote:
snowak (AT) scotprint (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message
news:1178961705.598635.249730 (AT) u30g2000hsc (DOT) googlegroups.com...
Pains me to suggest this , but a once fine airline has been ruined
by
haphazard and reckless expansion - e N America flights are a joke ,
how long will pax put up with this ? The short haul seem to suffer
almost daily tech delays and ridiculously short turnround times .
The
airline quality forums are embarrasing to read . Time for the CAA to
step in ?


Hi
No its not time for the CAA to step in or for the airline to be
shutdown, its time that the Management got a rocket up their backside
and this can be done in other ways, calling in the CAA is just going
to cause them more problems.

I think folk should make sure that the airlines knows how much folk
are hacked off with them, then again look at FR, a lot of folk are
unhappy with them but they are still doing well.

They are trying too grow too quickly for some silly reason and now its
showing, some folk said this would be the outcome.


Yes John I was being a bit " tongue in cheek " . For me the tech
delays on short haul are the most worrying . What alternatives do you
have on their routes - perhaps EZY will come on board more , but for
this year - zilch . No one else flies EDI-AGP , they may think they
can get away with it . Ladt year the short haul times were far too
generous , this year the other way round . They also have a bad
reputation for altering schedules at short notice .
Back to top
Scotsbeef
Guest





PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2007 2:50 pm    Post subject: Re: GSM - is it time to shut them down ? Reply with quote

On May 12, 10:21 am, sno...@scotprint.co.uk wrote:
Quote:
Pains me to suggest this , but a once fine airline has been ruined by
haphazard and reckless expansion - e N America flights are a joke ,
how long will pax put up with this ? The short haul seem to suffer
almost daily tech delays and ridiculously short turnround times . The
airline quality forums are embarrasing to read . Time for the CAA to
step in ?

Don't know about the CAA shutting them down ( can they do that on non-
safety grounds?) but I absolutely agree with what you say about the
flight review sites. I flew with them once and it was fine (minor
issues with check-in both ends) but reading the reviews would put me
off booking with them again. A friend was going to Nice for a
conference last week (Thursday 3rd) and when I phoned her she had been
waiting over 4 hours.
Back to top
Callum Johnstone
Guest





PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2007 4:33 pm    Post subject: Re: GSM - is it time to shut them down ? Reply with quote

<snowak (AT) scotprint (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message
news:1178961705.598635.249730 (AT) u30g2000hsc (DOT) googlegroups.com...
Quote:
Pains me to suggest this , but a once fine airline has been ruined by
haphazard and reckless expansion - e N America flights are a joke ,
how long will pax put up with this ? The short haul seem to suffer
almost daily tech delays and ridiculously short turnround times . The
airline quality forums are embarrasing to read . Time for the CAA to
step in ?

I think perhaps they should merge with Jet 2, and perhaps they would achieve
greater efficiency together?

I honestly think their long haul expansion is moving too quickly, and they
should concentrate on what they do best: short haul, leisure flights to
European destinations like Palma and Malaga, and they should concentrate
firmly on the Scottish market where they are well known - EDI, GLA and ABZ -
before trying to spread themselves thinly across the rest of the UK where
the competition is much more intense.

Hopefully they will take a step back and assess where they're at, and what
needs to be done to get back on track.
Back to top
Clive Braham
Guest





PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2007 5:07 pm    Post subject: Re: GSM - is it time to shut them down ? Reply with quote

"Callum Johnstone" <callumjohnstone (AT) blueyonder (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message
news:2Ch1i.33001$1J.15953 (AT) fe1 (DOT) news.blueyonder.co.uk...
Quote:

snowak (AT) scotprint (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message
news:1178961705.598635.249730 (AT) u30g2000hsc (DOT) googlegroups.com...
Pains me to suggest this , but a once fine airline has been ruined by
haphazard and reckless expansion - e N America flights are a joke ,
how long will pax put up with this ? The short haul seem to suffer
almost daily tech delays and ridiculously short turnround times . The
airline quality forums are embarrasing to read . Time for the CAA to
step in ?

I think perhaps they should merge with Jet 2, and perhaps they would
achieve greater efficiency together?


I'd certainly hope they wouldn't even contemplate that.

Quote:

I honestly think their long haul expansion is moving too quickly, and they
should concentrate on what they do best: short haul, leisure flights to
European destinations like Palma and Malaga, and they should concentrate
firmly on the Scottish market where they are well known - EDI, GLA and
ABZ - before trying to spread themselves thinly across the rest of the UK
where the competition is much more intense.

Hopefully they will take a step back and assess where they're at, and what
needs to be done to get back on track.



They have 4 more tx capable aircraft arriving within a month. The problem
just now is that they don't have enough aircraft to operate the planned
schedules but that will be sorted very soon. TD said previously that
sourcing the aircraft was a nightmare - he could probably see this fiasco
coming when he said that. Up until very recently they had a fantastic time
keeping record and a strong financial position. They'll be back on track in
June and I doubt the damage done to customer confidence will be
insurmountable. I certainly wish them every success.

Clive
Back to top
Callum Johnstone
Guest





PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2007 5:21 pm    Post subject: Re: GSM - is it time to shut them down ? Reply with quote

"Clive Braham" <clive (AT) braham5 (DOT) freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:5alovgF2p3eb3U1 (AT) mid (DOT) individual.net...
Quote:

"Callum Johnstone" <callumjohnstone (AT) blueyonder (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message
news:2Ch1i.33001$1J.15953 (AT) fe1 (DOT) news.blueyonder.co.uk...

snowak (AT) scotprint (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message
news:1178961705.598635.249730 (AT) u30g2000hsc (DOT) googlegroups.com...
Pains me to suggest this , but a once fine airline has been ruined by
haphazard and reckless expansion - e N America flights are a joke ,
how long will pax put up with this ? The short haul seem to suffer
almost daily tech delays and ridiculously short turnround times . The
airline quality forums are embarrasing to read . Time for the CAA to
step in ?

I think perhaps they should merge with Jet 2, and perhaps they would
achieve greater efficiency together?


I'd certainly hope they wouldn't even contemplate that.

Thinking it through:

They both operate the 737 and 757.
They have worked together before through the Channel Express 'link'.
There isn't a great deal of route overlap.
Jet 2 is an airline whose focus is on northern Britain.

I think there might be potential, and it doesn't have to impact negatively
on Scotland. You'd have the three Scottish bases (EDI, GLA, ABZ) plus the
major Jet 2 ops at Leeds-Bradford, Newcastle, Manchester, Blackpool and
Belfast. I think it could work. If it might help to stabilise GSM a bit more
then perhaps it's something they should consider?
Quote:

I honestly think their long haul expansion is moving too quickly, and
they should concentrate on what they do best: short haul, leisure flights
to European destinations like Palma and Malaga, and they should
concentrate firmly on the Scottish market where they are well known -
EDI, GLA and ABZ - before trying to spread themselves thinly across the
rest of the UK where the competition is much more intense.

Hopefully they will take a step back and assess where they're at, and
what needs to be done to get back on track.



They have 4 more tx capable aircraft arriving within a month. The problem
just now is that they don't have enough aircraft to operate the planned
schedules but that will be sorted very soon. TD said previously that
sourcing the aircraft was a nightmare - he could probably see this fiasco
coming when he said that. Up until very recently they had a fantastic time
keeping record and a strong financial position. They'll be back on track
in June and I doubt the damage done to customer confidence will be
insurmountable. I certainly wish them every success.

Well, they're not getting fantastic press just now. Let's hope they can
indeed turn it around. GSM has been good for Scotland, but let's hope they
can continue to grow sustainably rather than impulsively. I wish them all
the best too.
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2007 7:29 pm    Post subject: Re: GSM - is it time to shut them down ? Reply with quote

On May 12, 1:21 pm, "Callum Johnstone"
<callumjohnst...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
Quote:
"Clive Braham" <c...@braham5.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message

news:5alovgF2p3eb3U1 (AT) mid (DOT) individual.net...





"Callum Johnstone" <callumjohnst...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:2Ch1i.33001$1J.15953 (AT) fe1 (DOT) news.blueyonder.co.uk...

sno...@scotprint.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1178961705.598635.249730 (AT) u30g2000hsc (DOT) googlegroups.com...
Pains me to suggest this , but a once fine airline has been ruined by
haphazard and reckless expansion - e N America flights are a joke ,
how long will pax put up with this ? The short haul seem to suffer
almost daily tech delays and ridiculously short turnround times . The
airline quality forums are embarrasing to read . Time for the CAA to
step in ?

I think perhaps they should merge with Jet 2, and perhaps they would
achieve greater efficiency together?

I'd certainly hope they wouldn't even contemplate that.

Thinking it through:

They both operate the 737 and 757.
They have worked together before through the Channel Express 'link'.
There isn't a great deal of route overlap.
Jet 2 is an airline whose focus is on northern Britain.

I think there might be potential, and it doesn't have to impact negatively
on Scotland. You'd have the three Scottish bases (EDI, GLA, ABZ) plus the
major Jet 2 ops at Leeds-Bradford, Newcastle, Manchester, Blackpool and
Belfast. I think it could work. If it might help to stabilise GSM a bit more
then perhaps it's something they should consider?





I honestly think their long haul expansion is moving too quickly, and
they should concentrate on what they do best: short haul, leisure flights
to European destinations like Palma and Malaga, and they should
concentrate firmly on the Scottish market where they are well known -
EDI, GLA and ABZ - before trying to spread themselves thinly across the
rest of the UK where the competition is much more intense.

Hopefully they will take a step back and assess where they're at, and
what needs to be done to get back on track.

They have 4 more tx capable aircraft arriving within a month. The problem
just now is that they don't have enough aircraft to operate the planned
schedules but that will be sorted very soon. TD said previously that
sourcing the aircraft was a nightmare - he could probably see this fiasco
coming when he said that. Up until very recently they had a fantastic time
keeping record and a strong financial position. They'll be back on track
in June and I doubt the damage done to customer confidence will be
insurmountable. I certainly wish them every success.

Well, they're not getting fantastic press just now. Let's hope they can
indeed turn it around. GSM has been good for Scotland, but let's hope they
can continue to grow sustainably rather than impulsively. I wish them all
the best too.

I feel sorry for the poor employees who have to come face to face with
the quite rightly P***** off passengers.It's the front line troops who
have to explain away the problems created by poor decisions made by
management.
Time for a shake up at the higher level and get some better qualified
people in.

Crawford
Back to top
Clive Braham
Guest





PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2007 8:40 pm    Post subject: Re: GSM - is it time to shut them down ? Reply with quote

<hiddelston (AT) yahoo (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message
news:1178980187.624929.234590 (AT) y80g2000hsf (DOT) googlegroups.com...

Quote:

I feel sorry for the poor employees who have to come face to face with
the quite rightly P***** off passengers.It's the front line troops who
have to explain away the problems created by poor decisions made by
management.
Time for a shake up at the higher level and get some better qualified
people in.

Crawford


I'm confident all they need is the aircraft that are joining the fleet very
soon. I suppose if mistakes have been made it's the leasing of the 767's to
Air India without adequate cover for the start of the summer season.
Obviously that's been lucrative for the company but at the cost of all this
hassel as it turned out.

Clive
Back to top
Clive Braham
Guest





PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2007 9:06 pm    Post subject: Re: GSM - is it time to shut them down ? Reply with quote

"Callum Johnstone" <callumjohnstone (AT) blueyonder (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message
news:6ji1i.33082$1J.17154 (AT) fe1 (DOT) news.blueyonder.co.uk...
Quote:

I think perhaps they should merge with Jet 2, and perhaps they would
achieve greater efficiency together?


I'd certainly hope they wouldn't even contemplate that.

Thinking it through:

They both operate the 737 and 757.
They have worked together before through the Channel Express 'link'.
There isn't a great deal of route overlap.
Jet 2 is an airline whose focus is on northern Britain.

I think there might be potential, and it doesn't have to impact negatively
on Scotland. You'd have the three Scottish bases (EDI, GLA, ABZ) plus the
major Jet 2 ops at Leeds-Bradford, Newcastle, Manchester, Blackpool and
Belfast. I think it could work. If it might help to stabilise GSM a bit
more then perhaps it's something they should consider?

Mergers are never good news. I take your points but don't see any benefit or
need to change for either outfit. I don't know much about Jet2's finances
but presumably they do alright and wouldn't want to sell up. The only
history the companies have is that GSM leased some aircraft from Jet2's
parent company in the early days. GSM have come on in leaps and bounds since
then.

The main part of Globespan's business is the packages they sell. This sets
them apart from most real lo-co airlines and probably provides a far
stronger revenue stream than just selling cheap flight seats. The
UK-Canadian business is well established and not just a fad and they have
expanded that into the USA and South Africa. Their financial position is
still strong and they still have ambition, including the 787's on order to
open up all sorts of new opportunities, hopefully from Scotland. I'd hate a
knee jerk reaction to the present operational difficulties to alter the
outlook. I don't think GSM need to change anything other than getting the
right number of aircraft in the fleet to fulfill the schedules, which will
be accomplished by this time next month.

Clive
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2007 10:40 pm    Post subject: Re: GSM - is it time to shut them down ? Reply with quote

On May 12, 4:40 pm, "Clive Braham" <c...@braham5.freeserve.co.uk>
wrote:
Quote:
hiddels...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message

news:1178980187.624929.234590 (AT) y80g2000hsf (DOT) googlegroups.com...



I feel sorry for the poor employees who have to come face to face with
the quite rightly P***** off passengers.It's the front line troops who
have to explain away the problems created by poor decisions made by
management.
Time for a shake up at the higher level and get some better qualified
people in.

Crawford

I'm confident all they need is the aircraft that are joining the fleet very
soon. I suppose if mistakes have been made it's the leasing of the 767's to
Air India without adequate cover for the start of the summer season.
Obviously that's been lucrative for the company but at the cost of all this
hassel as it turned out.

Clive

Yes I agree once they have the aircraft back in service everything
will be okay but it has backfired big time leasing those aircraft to
Air India - what were they thinking about? I bet any profit they had
made from that deal has quickly been eaten up by these delays.
Why have they not leased in a charter to ease the congestion that has
built up over the last few days?

Crawford
Back to top
GKirk
Guest





PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2007 12:13 pm    Post subject: Re: GSM - is it time to shut them down ? Reply with quote

On 12 May, 12:33, "Callum Johnstone"
<callumjohnst...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
Quote:
sno...@scotprint.co.uk> wrote in message

news:1178961705.598635.249730 (AT) u30g2000hsc (DOT) googlegroups.com...

Pains me to suggest this , but a once fine airline has been ruined by
haphazard and reckless expansion - e N America flights are a joke ,
how long will pax put up with this ? The short haul seem to suffer
almost daily tech delays and ridiculously short turnround times . The
airline quality forums are embarrasing to read . Time for the CAA to
step in ?

I think perhaps they should merge with Jet 2, and perhaps they would achieve
greater efficiency together?


Nooooooooooooooooooooo Jet2 are doing just fine.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AirTalk.org Forum Index -> Edinburgh Airport All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2006 phpBB Group
SEO toolkit © 2004-2006 webmedic.