AirTalk.org Forum Index AirTalk.org
Aviation discussions newsgroups
 
Archives   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Fuel Flow and Peak EGT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AirTalk.org Forum Index -> Owning Airplanes
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Kobra
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 6:12 am    Post subject: Fuel Flow and Peak EGT Reply with quote



Flyers,

While flying to FL from NJ last week I did what I always do and fly ROP by
75 to 100 degrees. This is how I was trained and my CFII is also my A&P /
IA.

I know enough about LOP to know I will not operate LOP without an engine
analyzer and probably GAMI injectors which I do not yet possess.

During the trip I was looking at my fuel computer and seeing an average FF
of 10.5 to 11.5 GPH at 6 to 7 thousand feet at about 22 to 23 inches MP and
2400 RPM at 75 degrees ROP.

I pulled my POH out and looked up the cruise performance numbers for those
parameters and those altitudes and I saw the recommended FF's. If I leaned
to the recommended FF's I was usually at peak EGT.

So my question is: Does Cessna advocate running at peak EGT in cruise? Or
if "advocate" is a strong word, are they at least saying "you can if you
want to" run at peak EGT in cruise? I've always heard that running at peak
EGT is bad for the top end of the engine.

Kobra
Back to top
Dan Luke
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 6:12 am    Post subject: Re: Fuel Flow and Peak EGT Reply with quote



"Kobra" wrote:

Quote:
While flying to FL from NJ last week I did what I always do and fly ROP by
75 to 100 degrees. This is how I was trained and my CFII is also my A&P /
IA.

I know enough about LOP to know I will not operate LOP without an engine
analyzer and probably GAMI injectors which I do not yet possess.

You are wise to err on the side of caution, but it is possible to run LOP
without fear of damaging the engine if you limit power. At 65% or below, it
can be done safely without an analyzer.

Quote:
During the trip I was looking at my fuel computer and seeing an average FF
of 10.5 to 11.5 GPH at 6 to 7 thousand feet at about 22 to 23 inches MP and
2400 RPM at 75 degrees ROP.

What model engine? I often run LOP at those settings with a Lyc. O-360 F1A6.

Quote:
I pulled my POH out and looked up the cruise performance numbers for those
parameters and those altitudes and I saw the recommended FF's. If I leaned
to the recommended FF's I was usually at peak EGT.

So my question is: Does Cessna advocate running at peak EGT in cruise? Or
if "advocate" is a strong word, are they at least saying "you can if you
want to" run at peak EGT in cruise? I've always heard that running at peak
EGT is bad for the top end of the engine.

Depends on the % power you're making.

--
Dan
C172RG at BFM
Back to top
Stan Prevost
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 6:12 am    Post subject: Re: Fuel Flow and Peak EGT Reply with quote



"Newps" <nowhere (AT) nowhere (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:dK-dnTS05-luNq_bnZ2dnUVZ_qiqnZ2d (AT) bresnan (DOT) com...
Quote:


Neither is necessary. I have neither in my Bo, just a regular single
point EGT. Mine runs great LOP. Yours may not without the GAMI's.

How do you know you are LOP on all cylinders?
Back to top
Newps
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 6:12 am    Post subject: Re: Fuel Flow and Peak EGT Reply with quote

Kobra wrote:

Quote:
Flyers,

While flying to FL from NJ last week I did what I always do and fly ROP by
75 to 100 degrees. This is how I was trained and my CFII is also my A&P /
IA.

Ouch, ouch and double ouch. About the worst place to operate an engine.



Quote:

I know enough about LOP to know I will not operate LOP without an engine
analyzer and probably GAMI injectors which I do not yet possess.

Neither is necessary. I have neither in my Bo, just a regular single
point EGT. Mine runs great LOP. Yours may not without the GAMI's.
Remember anything at 65% and less power it doesn't matter where you put
the mixture, you cannot harm the engine.



Quote:

During the trip I was looking at my fuel computer and seeing an average FF
of 10.5 to 11.5 GPH at 6 to 7 thousand feet at about 22 to 23 inches MP and
2400 RPM at 75 degrees ROP.

I pulled my POH out and looked up the cruise performance numbers for those
parameters and those altitudes and I saw the recommended FF's. If I leaned
to the recommended FF's I was usually at peak EGT.

So my question is: Does Cessna advocate running at peak EGT in cruise? Or
if "advocate" is a strong word, are they at least saying "you can if you
want to" run at peak EGT in cruise? I've always heard that running at peak
EGT is bad for the top end of the engine.


Do a Google search for Red Box.
Back to top
Thomas Borchert
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 2:18 pm    Post subject: Re: Fuel Flow and Peak EGT Reply with quote

Kobra,

Quote:
Does Cessna advocate running at peak EGT in cruise?

Absolutely. That's what they call "best economy" setting, as opposed to "best
power", which is 75 or so ROP.

Quote:
I've always heard that running at peak
EGT is bad for the top end of the engine.

Have you, now? And the person(s) saying that have provided proof, numbers or
at least some kind of reasoning, I assume? Which goes how?

Don't fall for OWTs. The proper reaction to statements like that above is
"Show me the numbers!". If they can't, well, they're out. The LOP people can.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)
Back to top
Matt Barrow
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 5:58 pm    Post subject: Re: Fuel Flow and Peak EGT Reply with quote

"Kobra" <kobra (AT) yahoo (DOT) net> wrote in message
news:07GdnVYQ4b9BP6_bnZ2dnUVZ_segnZ2d (AT) comcast (DOT) com...
Quote:
Flyers,

While flying to FL from NJ last week I did what I always do and fly ROP by
75 to 100 degrees. This is how I was trained and my CFII is also my A&P /
IA.

I know enough about LOP to know I will not operate LOP without an engine
analyzer and probably GAMI injectors which I do not yet possess.

If you keep running in that area (ROP) you might not have your engine long
enough to get those things.

How much would GAMIjectors and a Engine Analyzer cost compared to a top
overhaul (or worse)?

Quote:

During the trip I was looking at my fuel computer and seeing an average FF
of 10.5 to 11.5 GPH at 6 to 7 thousand feet at about 22 to 23 inches MP
and 2400 RPM at 75 degrees ROP.

Why did you (if it WAS you) install a fuel computer but not an engine
analyzer? A fuel computer is _nice_, but only if you fly your tanks close to
empty, but an EA is a _necessity_. A $3500 EA does wonders to protect a
$20K+ engine.


Quote:

I pulled my POH out and looked up the cruise performance numbers for those
parameters and those altitudes and I saw the recommended FF's. If I
leaned to the recommended FF's I was usually at peak EGT.

http://www.avweb.com/newspics/194816_mixture_setting_triangle_graph-basic.gif
Back to top
Newps
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 10:36 pm    Post subject: Re: Fuel Flow and Peak EGT Reply with quote

Stan Prevost wrote:

Quote:
"Newps" <nowhere (AT) nowhere (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:dK-dnTS05-luNq_bnZ2dnUVZ_qiqnZ2d (AT) bresnan (DOT) com...


Neither is necessary. I have neither in my Bo, just a regular single
point EGT. Mine runs great LOP. Yours may not without the GAMI's.


How do you know you are LOP on all cylinders?


I don't. Not necessary.
Back to top
Matt Barrow
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 11:03 pm    Post subject: Re: Fuel Flow and Peak EGT Reply with quote

"Newps" <nowhere (AT) nowhere (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:i6KdnQlF9ru9G67bnZ2dnUVZ_rPinZ2d (AT) bresnan (DOT) com...
Quote:


Stan Prevost wrote:

"Newps" <nowhere (AT) nowhere (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:dK-dnTS05-luNq_bnZ2dnUVZ_qiqnZ2d (AT) bresnan (DOT) com...


Neither is necessary. I have neither in my Bo, just a regular single
point EGT. Mine runs great LOP. Yours may not without the GAMI's.


How do you know you are LOP on all cylinders?


I don't. Not necessary.

Not necessary if you don't mind burning up one or two jugs?
Back to top
Newps
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 11:31 pm    Post subject: Re: Fuel Flow and Peak EGT Reply with quote

Matt Barrow wrote:

Quote:
"Newps" <nowhere (AT) nowhere (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:i6KdnQlF9ru9G67bnZ2dnUVZ_rPinZ2d (AT) bresnan (DOT) com...


Stan Prevost wrote:


"Newps" <nowhere (AT) nowhere (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:dK-dnTS05-luNq_bnZ2dnUVZ_qiqnZ2d (AT) bresnan (DOT) com...


Neither is necessary. I have neither in my Bo, just a regular single
point EGT. Mine runs great LOP. Yours may not without the GAMI's.


How do you know you are LOP on all cylinders?


I don't. Not necessary.


Not necessary if you don't mind burning up one or two jugs?


No such thing will happen.
Back to top
Matt Barrow
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2007 5:08 am    Post subject: Re: Fuel Flow and Peak EGT Reply with quote

"Newps" <nowhere (AT) nowhere (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:YqGdnckCH4xID67bnZ2dnUVZ_uHinZ2d (AT) bresnan (DOT) com...
Quote:


Matt Barrow wrote:

"Newps" <nowhere (AT) nowhere (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:i6KdnQlF9ru9G67bnZ2dnUVZ_rPinZ2d (AT) bresnan (DOT) com...


Stan Prevost wrote:


"Newps" <nowhere (AT) nowhere (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:dK-dnTS05-luNq_bnZ2dnUVZ_qiqnZ2d (AT) bresnan (DOT) com...


Neither is necessary. I have neither in my Bo, just a regular single
point EGT. Mine runs great LOP. Yours may not without the GAMI's.


How do you know you are LOP on all cylinders?


I don't. Not necessary.


Not necessary if you don't mind burning up one or two jugs?


No such thing will happen.

It will if the leanest is LOP, but one is still ROP.
Back to top
Newps
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2007 5:12 am    Post subject: Re: Fuel Flow and Peak EGT Reply with quote

Matt Barrow wrote:

Quote:
No such thing will happen.


It will if the leanest is LOP, but one is still ROP.



I don't do that.
Back to top
Thomas Borchert
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2007 12:45 pm    Post subject: Re: Fuel Flow and Peak EGT Reply with quote

Matt,

Quote:
It will if the leanest is LOP, but one is still ROP.


And the problem with that, at 75 percent or less power, is exactly
what?

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)
Back to top
Matt Barrow
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 1:42 am    Post subject: Re: Fuel Flow and Peak EGT Reply with quote

"Newps" <nowhere (AT) nowhere (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:UdGdneTNm7xPf67bnZ2dnUVZ_tPinZ2d (AT) bresnan (DOT) com...
Quote:


Matt Barrow wrote:

No such thing will happen.


It will if the leanest is LOP, but one is still ROP.


I don't do that.

How do you know?

Isn't that the point of a temp sensor on each and every cylinder?
Back to top
Newps
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:49 am    Post subject: Re: Fuel Flow and Peak EGT Reply with quote

Matt Barrow wrote:
Quote:
"Newps" <nowhere (AT) nowhere (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:UdGdneTNm7xPf67bnZ2dnUVZ_tPinZ2d (AT) bresnan (DOT) com...


Matt Barrow wrote:


No such thing will happen.


It will if the leanest is LOP, but one is still ROP.


I don't do that.


How do you know?

Isn't that the point of a temp sensor on each and every cylinder?



One of the reasons, yes. But at 75% or less you don't use it for that.
Back to top
Mike Noel
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 4:29 am    Post subject: Re: Fuel Flow and Peak EGT Reply with quote

That brings up an interesting point. I think the Lycoming recommendation
previously was <75% power for unrestricted leaning. Lately I have seen <65%
as a recommendation. Anyone have any background on the two different
limits?
I've noticed in my O-360-A1A that certain RPM settings (about 2450 in my
case) get a good EGT balance on all cylinders, and aggressive leaning
produces RPM and EGT drops without engine roughness. Is this what the gami
injected engines experience running LOP?

--
Best Regards,
Mike

http://photoshow.comcast.net/mikenoel

Macintosh - We might not get everything right, but at least we knew the
century was going to end.

"Newps" <nowhere (AT) nowhere (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:M5idnSgfMe1Tj6jbnZ2dnUVZ_hCdnZ2d (AT) bresnan (DOT) com...
Quote:


Matt Barrow wrote:
"Newps" <nowhere (AT) nowhere (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:UdGdneTNm7xPf67bnZ2dnUVZ_tPinZ2d (AT) bresnan (DOT) com...


Matt Barrow wrote:


No such thing will happen.


It will if the leanest is LOP, but one is still ROP.


I don't do that.


How do you know?

Isn't that the point of a temp sensor on each and every cylinder?



One of the reasons, yes. But at 75% or less you don't use it for that.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AirTalk.org Forum Index -> Owning Airplanes All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2006 phpBB Group
SEO toolkit © 2004-2006 webmedic.