 |
AirTalk.org Aviation discussions newsgroups
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Clive Braham Guest
|
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 7:54 pm Post subject: EK111? |
|
|
Is there an extra Emirates 773 tomorrow? EK111 in at 0900, EK222 out at 1000
with no pax, or am I imagining things?
Maybe an ad-hoc freight flight?
Clive |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
David Kerr Guest
|
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 11:15 pm Post subject: Re: EK111? |
|
|
On 26 Apr, 15:54, "Clive Braham" <c...@braham5.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
| Quote: | Is there an extra Emirates 773 tomorrow? EK111 in at 0900, EK222 out at 1000
with no pax, or am I imagining things?
Maybe an ad-hoc freight flight?
Clive
|
If it's any use, the freight flights that have come to MAN have been
EK4xxx and extra services 3xxx (so an extra GLA pax service would be
3025). I think they also use 7xxx for extra services; unfortunately, I
can't remember what the 1st number in represents for passenger
servcies :(
David
ps, forget about anty BA expansion outside London for the forseeable
future as they needed to be "radically restructured" according to
Willie Walsh if any prospective routes were to be profitable. Perhaps
we can now formally petition them to rename themselves London Airways? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Clive Braham Guest
|
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 11:23 pm Post subject: Re: EK111? |
|
|
"David Kerr" <david.avdb (AT) lineone (DOT) net> wrote in message
news:1177611314.214310.275860 (AT) u32g2000prd (DOT) googlegroups.com...
| Quote: | On 26 Apr, 15:54, "Clive Braham" <c...@braham5.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
Is there an extra Emirates 773 tomorrow? EK111 in at 0900, EK222 out at
1000
with no pax, or am I imagining things?
Maybe an ad-hoc freight flight?
Clive
If it's any use, the freight flights that have come to MAN have been
EK4xxx and extra services 3xxx (so an extra GLA pax service would be
3025). I think they also use 7xxx for extra services; unfortunately, I
can't remember what the 1st number in represents for passenger
servcies :(
|
Well there's no sign of it on any flight trackers or Emirates' flight status
info so I guess I must have been dreaming.
| Quote: | David
ps, forget about anty BA expansion outside London for the forseeable
future as they needed to be "radically restructured" according to
Willie Walsh if any prospective routes were to be profitable. Perhaps
we can now formally petition them to rename themselves London Airways?
|
For sure.
I didn't think we were expecting them to consider any new non-London routes,
were we?
Clive |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zippy Guest
|
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 12:14 am Post subject: Re: EK111? |
|
|
On Apr 26, 3:54 pm, "Clive Braham" <c...@braham5.freeserve.co.uk>
wrote:
| Quote: | Is there an extra Emirates 773 tomorrow? EK111 in at 0900, EK222 out at 1000
with no pax, or am I imagining things?
Maybe an ad-hoc freight flight?
Clive
|
Didn't expect it to be, but it's not on the GDS ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GKirk Guest
|
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 2:36 am Post subject: Re: EK111? |
|
|
On 26 Apr, 20:14, Zippy <kwa0...@hotmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: | On Apr 26, 3:54 pm, "Clive Braham" <c...@braham5.freeserve.co.uk
wrote:
Is there an extra Emirates 773 tomorrow? EK111 in at 0900, EK222 out at 1000
with no pax, or am I imagining things?
Maybe an ad-hoc freight flight?
Clive
Didn't expect it to be, but it's not on the GDS ...
|
Possibly BAA testing their screens? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
David Kerr Guest
|
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 3:13 am Post subject: Re: EK111? |
|
|
On 26 Apr, 19:23, "Clive Braham" <c...@braham5.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
| Quote: | "David Kerr" <david.a...@lineone.net> wrote in message
news:1177611314.214310.275860 (AT) u32g2000prd (DOT) googlegroups.com...
ps, forget about anty BA expansion outside London for the forseeable
future as they needed to be "radically restructured" according to
Willie Walsh if any prospective routes were to be profitable. Perhaps
we can now formally petition them to rename themselves London Airways?
For sure.
I didn't think we were expecting them to consider any new non-London routes,
were we?
|
I was particularly looking forward to seeing which 10 long-haul routes
they have apparently identified that could be operated from regional
airports profitably That info was on an airliners.net thread a long
while ago! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|