AirTalk.org Forum Index AirTalk.org
Aviation discussions newsgroups
 
Archives   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

EK111?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AirTalk.org Forum Index -> Glasgow Airport
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Clive Braham
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 7:54 pm    Post subject: EK111? Reply with quote



Is there an extra Emirates 773 tomorrow? EK111 in at 0900, EK222 out at 1000
with no pax, or am I imagining things?

Maybe an ad-hoc freight flight?

Clive
Back to top
David Kerr
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 11:15 pm    Post subject: Re: EK111? Reply with quote



On 26 Apr, 15:54, "Clive Braham" <c...@braham5.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
Quote:
Is there an extra Emirates 773 tomorrow? EK111 in at 0900, EK222 out at 1000
with no pax, or am I imagining things?

Maybe an ad-hoc freight flight?

Clive

If it's any use, the freight flights that have come to MAN have been
EK4xxx and extra services 3xxx (so an extra GLA pax service would be
3025). I think they also use 7xxx for extra services; unfortunately, I
can't remember what the 1st number in represents for passenger
servcies :(

David
ps, forget about anty BA expansion outside London for the forseeable
future as they needed to be "radically restructured" according to
Willie Walsh if any prospective routes were to be profitable. Perhaps
we can now formally petition them to rename themselves London Airways?
Back to top
Clive Braham
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 11:23 pm    Post subject: Re: EK111? Reply with quote



"David Kerr" <david.avdb (AT) lineone (DOT) net> wrote in message
news:1177611314.214310.275860 (AT) u32g2000prd (DOT) googlegroups.com...
Quote:
On 26 Apr, 15:54, "Clive Braham" <c...@braham5.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
Is there an extra Emirates 773 tomorrow? EK111 in at 0900, EK222 out at
1000
with no pax, or am I imagining things?

Maybe an ad-hoc freight flight?

Clive

If it's any use, the freight flights that have come to MAN have been
EK4xxx and extra services 3xxx (so an extra GLA pax service would be
3025). I think they also use 7xxx for extra services; unfortunately, I
can't remember what the 1st number in represents for passenger
servcies :(


Well there's no sign of it on any flight trackers or Emirates' flight status
info so I guess I must have been dreaming.


Quote:
David
ps, forget about anty BA expansion outside London for the forseeable
future as they needed to be "radically restructured" according to
Willie Walsh if any prospective routes were to be profitable. Perhaps
we can now formally petition them to rename themselves London Airways?


For sure.

I didn't think we were expecting them to consider any new non-London routes,
were we?

Clive
Back to top
Zippy
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 12:14 am    Post subject: Re: EK111? Reply with quote

On Apr 26, 3:54 pm, "Clive Braham" <c...@braham5.freeserve.co.uk>
wrote:
Quote:
Is there an extra Emirates 773 tomorrow? EK111 in at 0900, EK222 out at 1000
with no pax, or am I imagining things?

Maybe an ad-hoc freight flight?

Clive

Didn't expect it to be, but it's not on the GDS ...
Back to top
GKirk
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 2:36 am    Post subject: Re: EK111? Reply with quote

On 26 Apr, 20:14, Zippy <kwa0...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Apr 26, 3:54 pm, "Clive Braham" <c...@braham5.freeserve.co.uk
wrote:

Is there an extra Emirates 773 tomorrow? EK111 in at 0900, EK222 out at 1000
with no pax, or am I imagining things?

Maybe an ad-hoc freight flight?

Clive

Didn't expect it to be, but it's not on the GDS ...

Possibly BAA testing their screens?
Back to top
David Kerr
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 3:13 am    Post subject: Re: EK111? Reply with quote

On 26 Apr, 19:23, "Clive Braham" <c...@braham5.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
Quote:
"David Kerr" <david.a...@lineone.net> wrote in message

news:1177611314.214310.275860 (AT) u32g2000prd (DOT) googlegroups.com...

ps, forget about anty BA expansion outside London for the forseeable
future as they needed to be "radically restructured" according to
Willie Walsh if any prospective routes were to be profitable. Perhaps
we can now formally petition them to rename themselves London Airways?

For sure.

I didn't think we were expecting them to consider any new non-London routes,
were we?


I was particularly looking forward to seeing which 10 long-haul routes
they have apparently identified that could be operated from regional
airports profitably That info was on an airliners.net thread a long
while ago!
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AirTalk.org Forum Index -> Glasgow Airport All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2006 phpBB Group
SEO toolkit © 2004-2006 webmedic.