AirTalk.org Forum Index AirTalk.org
Aviation discussions newsgroups
 
Archives   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

BELL 417

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AirTalk.org Forum Index -> Helicopters and rotary wing aircrafts
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Guest






PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 11:54 pm    Post subject: BELL 417 Reply with quote



I heard via the rumor mill that Bell has cancelled the 417. Also
heard that Bell has crashed 3 of the new armed recon helos and the
Army is concidering cacelling the contract. Anyone have any new on
the above taopics?
Back to top
Linc
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 8:16 pm    Post subject: Re: BELL 417 Reply with quote



The 417 cancelation was announced at Heli-Expo 07: fact.
The Army issued a stop work notice to Bell requiring them to stop work
for 30 days and create a plan to restructure the program to get the
costs back down and put the program back on schedule. Bell petitioned
the Army to allow them to continue working while they do the required
restructuring. The Army acquiesced to that request: all fact.
Only one crash has been acknowledged by Bell.

Linc

On Apr 6, 2:54 pm, hunterbaro...@gmail.com wrote:
Quote:
I heard via the rumor mill that Bell has cancelled the 417. Also
heard that Bell has crashed 3 of the new armed recon helos and the
Army is concidering cacelling the contract. Anyone have any new on
the above taopics?
Back to top
Maxwell
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 6:12 am    Post subject: Re: BELL 417 Reply with quote



<hunterbarossa (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:1176179698.451023.146550 (AT) y80g2000hsf (DOT) googlegroups.com...
Quote:
Amazing that Bell cannot even design yet another upgrade to the 206.
I wonder why Eurocopter with freash clean sheet designs is the leading
supplier of helicopters? Just cannot figure that out.

Let's see, Long ranger, 407, 427, 427i (I guess that one did not work
either) and now the 429.

Maybe Bell should hire European engineers and managers.


The 206 was designed before Larry Bell died wasn't it?
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 6:12 am    Post subject: Re: BELL 417 Reply with quote

Amazing that Bell cannot even design yet another upgrade to the 206.
I wonder why Eurocopter with freash clean sheet designs is the leading
supplier of helicopters? Just cannot figure that out.

Let's see, Long ranger, 407, 427, 427i (I guess that one did not work
either) and now the 429.

Maybe Bell should hire European engineers and managers.

On Apr 7, 8:16 am, "Linc" <linc.linc...@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
The 417 cancelation was announced at Heli-Expo 07: fact.
The Army issued a stop work notice to Bell requiring them to stop work
for 30 days and create a plan to restructure the program to get the
costs back down and put the program back on schedule. Bell petitioned
the Army to allow them to continue working while they do the required
restructuring. The Army acquiesced to that request: all fact.
Only one crash has been acknowledged by Bell.

Linc

On Apr 6, 2:54 pm, hunterbaro...@gmail.com wrote:

I heard via the rumor mill that Bell has cancelled the 417. Also
heard that Bell has crashed 3 of the new armed recon helos and the
Army is concidering cacelling the contract. Anyone have any new on
the above taopics?
Back to top
B4RT
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 4:40 pm    Post subject: Re: BELL 417 Reply with quote

<hunterbarossa (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:1176179698.451023.146550 (AT) y80g2000hsf (DOT) googlegroups.com...
Quote:
Amazing that Bell cannot even design yet another upgrade to the 206.
I wonder why Eurocopter with freash clean sheet designs is the leading
supplier of helicopters? Just cannot figure that out.


Airframes aren't like cars, we dont need new models every year. Look at the
B52. Add to that the fact that no one wants the 1st 100 of any type and you
can understand why they sometimes cancel projects.

Honestly the only thing I wish they'd change about the JetRanger is making
cleaner popout float gear for it. The reason I don't have a 407 is because
four bladed machines are a pain in the butt to house.


Bart
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 6:12 am    Post subject: Re: BELL 417 Reply with quote

Dear Bart:

Airframes could stand an aerodynamic update, construction materials
and/or methods update, fittings update... Ranger was designed in the
early 60's. Two bladed rotor systems are more subject to pilot error,
strong gusts, limited CG range,...

Bottom line, fresh safety minded new designs sell, not my argument
look at the market.

On Apr 10, 4:40 am, "B4RT" <noahb...@nospam.org> wrote:
Quote:
hunterbaro...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:1176179698.451023.146550 (AT) y80g2000hsf (DOT) googlegroups.com...

Amazing that Bell cannot even design yet another upgrade to the 206.
I wonder why Eurocopter with freash clean sheet designs is the leading
supplier of helicopters? Just cannot figure that out.

Airframes aren't like cars, we dont need new models every year. Look at the
B52. Add to that the fact that no one wants the 1st 100 of any type and you
can understand why they sometimes cancel projects.

Honestly the only thing I wish they'd change about the JetRanger is making
cleaner popout float gear for it. The reason I don't have a 407 is because
four bladed machines are a pain in the butt to house.

Bart
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AirTalk.org Forum Index -> Helicopters and rotary wing aircrafts All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2006 phpBB Group
SEO toolkit © 2004-2006 webmedic.