 |
AirTalk.org Aviation discussions newsgroups
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Guest
|
Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 6:11 am Post subject: Dreaming STARS |
|
|
Was I dreaming? Or did I once hear that RNP 1 and 2 stars/sids had
been published in the USA? I see type A and B, but these are RNAV,
and so must have no RNP requirement whatsoever, and can be flown by
any /G aircraft. Anyone provide some info?
Stan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Stan Prevost Guest
|
Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 6:11 am Post subject: Re: Dreaming STARS |
|
|
The RNAV A and B are now RNAV 1 and 2.
<pstanley55 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:gae6035sdm8ej5pe1rlsai7qfk3leif4a1 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com...
| Quote: | Was I dreaming? Or did I once hear that RNP 1 and 2 stars/sids had
been published in the USA? I see type A and B, but these are RNAV,
and so must have no RNP requirement whatsoever, and can be flown by
any /G aircraft. Anyone provide some info?
Stan |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 6:01 pm Post subject: Re: Dreaming STARS |
|
|
Ror RNAV 1 and 2 then, can you explain what the 1 and 2 mean, and any
relation to RNP 1 and 2?
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 22:39:13 -0500, "Stan Prevost"
<sprevost (AT) knology (DOT) net> wrote:
| Quote: | The RNAV A and B are now RNAV 1 and 2.
pstanley55 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:gae6035sdm8ej5pe1rlsai7qfk3leif4a1 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com...
Was I dreaming? Or did I once hear that RNP 1 and 2 stars/sids had
been published in the USA? I see type A and B, but these are RNAV,
and so must have no RNP requirement whatsoever, and can be flown by
any /G aircraft. Anyone provide some info?
Stan
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Stan Prevost Guest
|
Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 7:11 pm Post subject: Re: Dreaming STARS |
|
|
Sorry, I don't have (or know) a concise explanation of the relationship
between the RNAV requirements and RNP requirements. I was just pointing out
a recent change. Here are some references.
https://www.jeppesen.com/download/briefbull/bulletinjep_07_A.pdf
http://www.faa.gov/ats/atp/rnp/ac_90-100a.pdf
http://www.faa.gov/ats/atp/rnp/rnav.htm
http://tinyurl.com/2snraa
Stan
<pstanley55 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:m2n703tpbnbmqjetqdkoj4th3rr1q4ode4 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com...
| Quote: | Ror RNAV 1 and 2 then, can you explain what the 1 and 2 mean, and any
relation to RNP 1 and 2?
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 22:39:13 -0500, "Stan Prevost"
sprevost (AT) knology (DOT) net> wrote:
The RNAV A and B are now RNAV 1 and 2.
pstanley55 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:gae6035sdm8ej5pe1rlsai7qfk3leif4a1 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com...
Was I dreaming? Or did I once hear that RNP 1 and 2 stars/sids had
been published in the USA? I see type A and B, but these are RNAV,
and so must have no RNP requirement whatsoever, and can be flown by
any /G aircraft. Anyone provide some info?
Stan
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fbastok@gmail.com Guest
|
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 6:35 pm Post subject: Re: Dreaming STARS |
|
|
On 23 mar, 16:11, "Stan Prevost" <s...@sprevost.net> wrote:
| Quote: | Sorry, I don't have (or know) a concise explanation of the relationship
between the RNAV requirements and RNP requirements. I was just pointing out
a recent change. Here are some references.
|
RNAV usually means B-RNAV which is "aircraft must not deviate more
than 5 NM from the route during 95% of time".
So B-RNAV=RNP 5.
we begin to see RNP 2 and RNP 1 for more accurancy (RNP1=P-RNAV,
precision-RNAV).
SID/STAR are usually RNP 1 already in Europe. Enroute are RNP 5 or 2.
RNP1 can not be flown safely by a human being. So expect radar vectors
for departure/arrival
Fred |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2007 1:39 am Post subject: Re: Dreaming STARS |
|
|
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 09:11:55 -0500, "Stan Prevost" <stan (AT) sprevost (DOT) net>
wrote:
Thanks Stan. All good info. BTW, I never did see any requirement
that RNAV 1 or RNAV 2 sids or stars have the designation of RNP 1 or
2. So....while one may think obvioulsy it does, the FAA does not use
that RNP terminology in the the way RNP 10, for example, is required
in the Pacific. Stan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2007 1:44 am Post subject: Re: Dreaming STARS |
|
|
On 2 Apr 2007 06:35:11 -0700, "fbastok (AT) gmail (DOT) com" <fbastok (AT) gmail (DOT) com>
wrote:
| Quote: | On 23 mar, 16:11, "Stan Prevost" <s...@sprevost.net> wrote:
Sorry, I don't have (or know) a concise explanation of the relationship
between the RNAV requirements and RNP requirements. I was just pointing out
a recent change. Here are some references.
RNAV usually means B-RNAV which is "aircraft must not deviate more
than 5 NM from the route during 95% of time".
So B-RNAV=RNP 5.
we begin to see RNP 2 and RNP 1 for more accurancy (RNP1=P-RNAV,
precision-RNAV).
SID/STAR are usually RNP 1 already in Europe. Enroute are RNP 5 or 2.
RNP1 can not be flown safely by a human being. So expect radar vectors
for departure/arrival
Thanks Fred. So if BRNAV is RNP 5, why use the term BRNAV? |
While I've heard of PRNAV, I've not seen that one **needs** RNP 1 in
order to be PRNAV approved, Similarly, I don't think in the US
operators will need RNP1 or 2 approval to fly the new RNAV 1 or 2
sids/stars. All very murky to me.. Stan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|