AirTalk.org Forum Index AirTalk.org
Aviation discussions newsgroups
 
Archives   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

SAS Charter?
Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 118, 119, 120  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AirTalk.org Forum Index -> Glasgow Airport
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
server
Guest





PostPosted: Wed May 31, 2006 5:18 pm    Post subject: SAS Charter? Reply with quote



[ message unavailable ]
Back to top
Clive Braham
Guest





PostPosted: Wed May 31, 2006 5:18 pm    Post subject: Re: SAS Charter? Reply with quote



"GLAGAZ" <spazgaz (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:1149059184.244221.137170 (AT) h76g2000cwa (DOT) googlegroups.com...
Quote:
11:00 SK7158 OSLO (departure)

Gaz


Yes it's a 73G, and another one off charter coming is an Israir 757 visiting
on June 13 and 20 from TLV. Dunno what for.

Clive
Back to top
Damian
Guest





PostPosted: Wed May 31, 2006 9:47 pm    Post subject: Re: flyglobespan Newsflash 31/05/06 Reply with quote



Jim Mason wrote:
Quote:
Daily Prague service from Liverpool as
flyglobespan make swift expansion

FIRST TENERIFE, NOW FLIGHTS TO PRAGUE FROM ONLY £29.99 INC TAXES

Some more Globespan news today - they are breaking into the Canada
market (if you don't count the Air Transat flights) with a weekly
service from Manchester to Toronto starting in November.
Back to top
Damian
Guest





PostPosted: Wed May 31, 2006 10:00 pm    Post subject: Re: flyglobespan Newsflash 31/05/06 Reply with quote

Jim Mason wrote:
Quote:
In article <1149094079.734752.84090 (AT) i39g2000cwa (DOT) googlegroups.com>,
damianlearyo (AT) yahoo (DOT) co.uk says...

Jim Mason wrote:
Daily Prague service from Liverpool as
flyglobespan make swift expansion

FIRST TENERIFE, NOW FLIGHTS TO PRAGUE FROM ONLY £29.99 INC TAXES

Some more Globespan news today - they are breaking into the Canada
market (if you don't count the Air Transat flights) with a weekly
service from Manchester to Toronto starting in November.

They are expanding at quite a rate. Too fast possibly?

Jim

They're setting quite a pace. How well served is Toronto from
Manchester during the winter months? Hopefully Globespan are
advertising themselves rigorously in the Manchester area, as they don't
seem to enjoy the same high profile status south of the border as they
do here.
Back to top
Damian
Guest





PostPosted: Wed May 31, 2006 10:07 pm    Post subject: Re: flyglobespan Newsflash 31/05/06 Reply with quote

Jim Mason wrote:
Quote:
In article <1149094825.057666.292770 (AT) u72g2000cwu (DOT) googlegroups.com>,
damianlearyo (AT) yahoo (DOT) co.uk says...
Jim Mason wrote:
In article <1149094079.734752.84090 (AT) i39g2000cwa (DOT) googlegroups.com>,
damianlearyo (AT) yahoo (DOT) co.uk says...

Jim Mason wrote:
Daily Prague service from Liverpool as
flyglobespan make swift expansion

FIRST TENERIFE, NOW FLIGHTS TO PRAGUE FROM ONLY £29.99 INC TAXES

Some more Globespan news today - they are breaking into the Canada
market (if you don't count the Air Transat flights) with a weekly
service from Manchester to Toronto starting in November.

They are expanding at quite a rate. Too fast possibly?

Jim

They're setting quite a pace.

I just hope it is sustainable.

Jim

I'd really prefer them to be concentrating on their European network
from Glasgow and Edinburgh, plus the new flights to Aberdeen. There's
lots more potential there, I feel.
Back to top
Andrew Scotland
Guest





PostPosted: Wed May 31, 2006 10:13 pm    Post subject: Re: flyglobespan Newsflash 31/05/06 Reply with quote

Damian wrote:
Quote:
Jim Mason wrote:
In article <1149094825.057666.292770 (AT) u72g2000cwu (DOT) googlegroups.com>,
damianlearyo (AT) yahoo (DOT) co.uk says...
Jim Mason wrote:
In article <1149094079.734752.84090 (AT) i39g2000cwa (DOT) googlegroups.com>,
damianlearyo (AT) yahoo (DOT) co.uk says...

Jim Mason wrote:
Daily Prague service from Liverpool as
flyglobespan make swift expansion

FIRST TENERIFE, NOW FLIGHTS TO PRAGUE FROM ONLY £29.99 INC TAXES

Some more Globespan news today - they are breaking into the Canada
market (if you don't count the Air Transat flights) with a weekly
service from Manchester to Toronto starting in November.

They are expanding at quite a rate. Too fast possibly?

Jim

They're setting quite a pace.

I just hope it is sustainable.

Jim

I'd really prefer them to be concentrating on their European network
from Glasgow and Edinburgh, plus the new flights to Aberdeen. There's
lots more potential there, I feel.

Big mistake GSM going to MAN and Liverpool imo. They struggled at STN
because they where not known down there, MAN and Liverpool will be the
same unless they do a shit load of advertising.
Back to top
Damian
Guest





PostPosted: Wed May 31, 2006 10:17 pm    Post subject: Re: flyglobespan Newsflash 31/05/06 Reply with quote

Jim Mason wrote:
Quote:
In article <1149095279.016044.13930 (AT) u72g2000cwu (DOT) googlegroups.com>,
damianlearyo (AT) yahoo (DOT) co.uk says...

Jim Mason wrote:
In article <1149094825.057666.292770 (AT) u72g2000cwu (DOT) googlegroups.com>,
damianlearyo (AT) yahoo (DOT) co.uk says...
Jim Mason wrote:
In article <1149094079.734752.84090 (AT) i39g2000cwa (DOT) googlegroups.com>,
damianlearyo (AT) yahoo (DOT) co.uk says...

Jim Mason wrote:
Daily Prague service from Liverpool as
flyglobespan make swift expansion

FIRST TENERIFE, NOW FLIGHTS TO PRAGUE FROM ONLY £29.99 INC TAXES

Some more Globespan news today - they are breaking into the Canada
market (if you don't count the Air Transat flights) with a weekly
service from Manchester to Toronto starting in November.

They are expanding at quite a rate. Too fast possibly?

Jim

They're setting quite a pace.

I just hope it is sustainable.

Jim

I'd really prefer them to be concentrating on their European network
from Glasgow and Edinburgh, plus the new flights to Aberdeen. There's
lots more potential there, I feel.

Indeed. I just feel their expansion is too fast and too good to be
sustainable.

Their long haul expansion certainly seems that way. They might have
been better advised to see how their Florida flights go before
committing themselves to too much more. Still, I wish them luck.
Back to top
Damian
Guest





PostPosted: Wed May 31, 2006 10:19 pm    Post subject: Re: flyglobespan Newsflash 31/05/06 Reply with quote

Andrew Scotland wrote:
Quote:
Damian wrote:
Jim Mason wrote:
In article <1149094825.057666.292770 (AT) u72g2000cwu (DOT) googlegroups.com>,
damianlearyo (AT) yahoo (DOT) co.uk says...
Jim Mason wrote:
In article <1149094079.734752.84090 (AT) i39g2000cwa (DOT) googlegroups.com>,
damianlearyo (AT) yahoo (DOT) co.uk says...

Jim Mason wrote:
Daily Prague service from Liverpool as
flyglobespan make swift expansion

FIRST TENERIFE, NOW FLIGHTS TO PRAGUE FROM ONLY £29.99 INC TAXES

Some more Globespan news today - they are breaking into the Canada
market (if you don't count the Air Transat flights) with a weekly
service from Manchester to Toronto starting in November.

They are expanding at quite a rate. Too fast possibly?

Jim

They're setting quite a pace.

I just hope it is sustainable.

Jim

I'd really prefer them to be concentrating on their European network
from Glasgow and Edinburgh, plus the new flights to Aberdeen. There's
lots more potential there, I feel.

Big mistake GSM going to MAN and Liverpool imo. They struggled at STN
because they where not known down there, MAN and Liverpool will be the
same unless they do a shit load of advertising.

Indeed. They seem to have gone quiet at Stansted. Are they planning
anything more down there?
Back to top
Mister Niceguy
Guest





PostPosted: Wed May 31, 2006 10:42 pm    Post subject: Re: Interesting Reply with quote

"B" <blimpie (AT) btopenworld (DOT) com> wrote in news:1149028087.507245.152200
@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com:

Quote:

Mister Niceguy wrote:
"B" <blimpie (AT) btopenworld (DOT) com> wrote in
news:1149022774.113565.77470 (AT) j73g2000cwa (DOT) googlegroups.com:


Mister Niceguy wrote:
"B" <blimpie (AT) btopenworld (DOT) com> wrote in
news:1149011066.104955.12900@
38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:


Zippy wrote:
This http://www.webex.com/ apparently, is putting paid to a
lot
of
jollies out of the office on 'business trips,'

Our company has been using this for quite a while now ...

Has it curtailed business trips then Zippy?

It has made no difference to us. Since I saw it appear on our
intranet 2 or 3 years ago I have seen it used only once.

My own company Intranet only had a 'Home Page' item on it just
recently, advocating better use of the 'new improved' version of
Webex, I do think in the near term some companies will curtail
uneccessary business trips in favour of this tool.
Of course there will always be the need for face to face meetings
but
the days of an unproductive day trip 'jolly' are surely coming to
an
end.

I'll still have my day trips to London. But the big change is video
conferencing although not many people seem to like using it.

Of course they don't, it means they actually have to work for a
living,
doesn't it?

A bit cynical. Most people I know from work don't especially like
travelling, being away from home, getting up at 0430 for the first
flight etc etc etc.
Back to top
David Kerr
Guest





PostPosted: Wed May 31, 2006 10:42 pm    Post subject: Re: Transatlantic Growth Reply with quote

Clive Braham wrote:
Quote:


So about 10,000 pax per month, that sound good. I wonder why it didn't last?

I reckon it's because 9,500 passengers pewr month were paying economy
prices!

Quote:

MAN-JFK by non-BA: AA tried for 1991 to 1995, Aer Lingus winter
1995/1996 and Delta from 1998 to 2001. Hopefully, the new DL service
will be okay.

Let's try and get this right: AA operated year-round from July 91 to
October 94. EI then operated winter 1994/95. AA then used 757s on the
rpute during summer 1995.

Quote:
Interesting stuff. Did you hear a rumour about NW starting DTW-MAN/BHX
amongst other t/x 757 routes? I wasn't sure what to make of it in the end.

I've heard about it and all I can say is that they are known to be
interested in MAN (having applied previously for MAN-BOS and MAN-DTW),
so I would'nt rule it out completely. Might be a better route for a
small widebody rather than using a 757 - it would allow better cargo
capability which may make up for a lack of premium passengers.
Wouldn't be the 1st time they've operated at MAN...I'm old enough to
remember them operating a 2 weekly 747 Freighter service in the late
1970s/early 1980s...and what's even sadder, I even remember the
callsign: NW923!

David
Back to top
Zippy
Guest





PostPosted: Wed May 31, 2006 10:42 pm    Post subject: Re: PIK doing well Reply with quote

Doug Maclean wrote:
Quote:
http://business.scotsman.com/management.cfm?id=805682006

Maybe not booming but still setting new records. The comparison between its
peak uderr BAA, with Government directed traffic, and Infratil is stark





Doug

Scandinavian fun in the sun http://www.ski-norway.co.uk/

It's about time BAA really sat up and took notice of this. Look what
could have been at GLA.
Back to top
Clive Braham
Guest





PostPosted: Wed May 31, 2006 11:30 pm    Post subject: Re: PIK doing well Reply with quote

"Jim Mason" <jim.mason (AT) spamtrappedukonline (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message
news:MPG.1ee82edd1f8e55a3989944 (AT) news (DOT) individual.net...
Quote:
In article <1149115155.432973.225440 (AT) u72g2000cwu (DOT) googlegroups.com>,
kwa0711
@aol.com says...

Doug Maclean wrote:
http://business.scotsman.com/management.cfm?id=805682006

Maybe not booming but still setting new records. The comparison
between its
peak uderr BAA, with Government directed traffic, and Infratil is
stark

It's about time BAA really sat up and took notice of this. Look what
could have been at GLA.

Whooaaa! Steady Zippy. I assume you haven't flown from PIK in recent
times?
Things are improving, destinations are increasing, losses have stabilised
but at the end of the day it isn't quite the comfort departure point
demanded by many passengers (and I am sure I will get no argument from
Doug
on that).

The CEO states

"The secret of our success has been that by maintaining a lower cost
structure than our rivals, we tend to attract no-frills airlines as that
is
what they are looking for in order to offer their passengers low fares."

From my experience this is a very accurate statement from the CEO.

The `lower cost structure` is evident. It is similar to comparing Lidl to
Tesco.. Both in the game of selling various merchandise to buyers - Lidl
are aiming at a lower common denominator than Tesco.

And for the record I buy in both and use both airports!

Jim


Agreed. It couldn't have been at GLA on Ryanair's terms. PIK fits their
business model perfectly and at the time of Ryanair setting up PIK had
nothing to lose. The only problem is now that there are 2+ million pax going
through the doors there seems to be little operating profit to re-invest and
it costs money to cater for ever increasing numbers.

Clive
Back to top
John Dundas
Guest





PostPosted: Wed May 31, 2006 11:30 pm    Post subject: Re: EK Airbus Reply with quote

"Zippy" <kwa0711 (AT) aol (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:1149076787.642109.46260 (AT) j55g2000cwa (DOT) googlegroups.com...
Quote:

Red wrote:
Have noticed Emitares using an Airbus into Glasgow on a couple of
occassions in the last week or so, most recently today. Any known
reason for this, load factors? aircraft rotations? Their website
shows
77W operating DBX/GLA/DBX throught to March 2007.

Can't think of any obvious reason but perhaps the 77W is needed to
provide capacity elsewhere - IIRC last year on various dates EK
drafted
in a 777 to GLA when demand was needed - so perhaps the same thing
is
happening that another route needs the additional capacity at the
moment?

Ops for the next 2 weeks or so planned as follows:



Tell me about it. Looks like I have to go to Christchurch, New Zealand
and then back to Melbourne for a few days. Only problem is that I am
waiting for someone else to give the nod and if so I will either fly
on Friday
Back to top
Zippy
Guest





PostPosted: Wed May 31, 2006 11:30 pm    Post subject: Re: EK Airbus Reply with quote

Red wrote:
Quote:
Have noticed Emitares using an Airbus into Glasgow on a couple of
occassions in the last week or so, most recently today. Any known
reason for this, load factors? aircraft rotations? Their website shows
77W operating DBX/GLA/DBX throught to March 2007.

Once again apologies for nit-picking but it's DXB.
Back to top
Jim Mason
Guest





PostPosted: Wed May 31, 2006 11:30 pm    Post subject: Re: PIK doing well Reply with quote

In article <1149115155.432973.225440 (AT) u72g2000cwu (DOT) googlegroups.com>, kwa0711
@aol.com says...
Quote:

Doug Maclean wrote:
http://business.scotsman.com/management.cfm?id=805682006

Maybe not booming but still setting new records. The comparison between its
peak uderr BAA, with Government directed traffic, and Infratil is stark

It's about time BAA really sat up and took notice of this. Look what
could have been at GLA.

Whooaaa! Steady Zippy. I assume you haven't flown from PIK in recent times?
Things are improving, destinations are increasing, losses have stabilised
but at the end of the day it isn't quite the comfort departure point
demanded by many passengers (and I am sure I will get no argument from Doug
on that).

The CEO states

"The secret of our success has been that by maintaining a lower cost
structure than our rivals, we tend to attract no-frills airlines as that is
what they are looking for in order to offer their passengers low fares."

From my experience this is a very accurate statement from the CEO.

The `lower cost structure` is evident. It is similar to comparing Lidl to
Tesco.. Both in the game of selling various merchandise to buyers - Lidl
are aiming at a lower common denominator than Tesco.

And for the record I buy in both and use both airports!

Jim

--
Remove `spamtrapped` to reply off-list

http://jim-mason.fotopic.net/c162491.html
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AirTalk.org Forum Index -> Glasgow Airport All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 118, 119, 120  Next
Page 1 of 120

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2006 phpBB Group
SEO toolkit © 2004-2006 webmedic.