AirTalk.org Forum Index AirTalk.org
Aviation discussions newsgroups
 
Archives   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Glasgow Growth Rate, 2006
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AirTalk.org Forum Index -> Glasgow Airport
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Fly gla
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 4:50 pm    Post subject: Glasgow Growth Rate, 2006 Reply with quote



Post here what you think this years growth rate will be for Glasgow.
Things to look out for.

No Air Canada
Reduction in Canadian flights.
Loss of a New York flight in the summer.
No SN
Prague reduced
No CSA.
Fly globespan Stansted flights look light being cut.

Bmi baby back from Prestwick
PIA 2x weekly
Emirates 777-300
Flyglobespan expansion
Daily Orlando.
Air Berlin

Thats just some of the things going on but I think Glasgow will grow
between 1.5% and 2.5%. Fairly slow but without massive expansion from
an airline its not going to be much more. Also does anyone think Jet2
might come to Glasgow as they currently serve EDI.

Back to top
Andrew Scotland
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 4:56 pm    Post subject: Re: Glasgow Growth Rate, 2006 Reply with quote



Jet2 could open a "base" at GLA or PIK.

Growth rate at GLA for 2006: 1.5% if we are lucky and no doubt at least
1 month will see a drop in numbers. Get BAA out.

Back to top
GLAGAZ
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 5:24 pm    Post subject: Re: Glasgow Growth Rate, 2006 Reply with quote




Andrew Scotland wrote:
Quote:
Jet2 could open a "base" at GLA or PIK.

Growth rate at GLA for 2006: 1.5% if we are lucky and no doubt at least
1 month will see a drop in numbers. Get BAA out.

Get BAA out?

Who do you propose replaces them?

Gaz


Back to top
Fly gla
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 5:25 pm    Post subject: Re: Glasgow Growth Rate, 2006 Reply with quote

Its funny everyday new routes seem to be launched from every airport in
the UK but not from Glasgow. But one thing that will probably be
certain is the cargo groth will be negative. For example December was
8% down even with the intro of the 777-300. But whereas aviation is
booming in the UK Glasgow seems to be bucking the trend. For examply
even Gatwick which is filled to capacity grew 5.5%. Thats 1.5 million
passangers whereas Glasgow only added 300,000. The other problem is
that slow growth struggle to attract airlines as it isnt very
attractive. Look at the fastest growing airports getting lots of new
routes. And without BAA getting off their backsides nothing is going to
happen. Plus why is BAA spending £200 million on Glasgow anyway. Where
is it going more shops as there isnt going to be the growth to require
new facilities.

For example the Old Hanger getting demolished for new stands. What is
the point in this. TO make the airfield look emptier. How many times do
you pass the airfield and the International pier is practically empty.
Especially in winter. They seem to put planes on the remote stands now
just to use them.

Back to top
sothwest
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 5:26 pm    Post subject: Re: Glasgow Growth Rate, 2006 Reply with quote

Thats just some of the things going on but I think Glasgow will grow
between 1.5% and 2.5%. Fairly slow but without massive expansion from
an airline its not going to be much more. Also does anyone think Jet2
might come to Glasgow as they currently serve EDI.


Lets not forget that a large slice of Gla business over the years has
been the charter market. A market that is reducing at this time in a
reasonably large amount. So any increase in the new routes will have to
offset the reductions in the charter market before any increase is
acheived. I have to be truthfull and say I have no idea as to whether
they will even acheive an increase this year. Not even appointed a new
boss yet, there is something wrong here I don't know what but i am
beginning to despair.
Up Up and away for Edi, Abz, and Pik plus many other regional Airports
in the UK. All Gla seems to be getting is bad news.

Southwest

Back to top
GKirk
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 5:36 pm    Post subject: Re: Glasgow Growth Rate, 2006 Reply with quote


sothwest wrote:

Quote:
Thats just some of the things going on but I think Glasgow will grow
between 1.5% and 2.5%. Fairly slow but without massive expansion from
an airline its not going to be much more. Also does anyone think Jet2
might come to Glasgow as they currently serve EDI.


Lets not forget that a large slice of Gla business over the years has
been the charter market. A market that is reducing at this time in a
reasonably large amount. So any increase in the new routes will have to
offset the reductions in the charter market before any increase is
acheived. I have to be truthfull and say I have no idea as to whether
they will even acheive an increase this year. Not even appointed a new
boss yet, there is something wrong here I don't know what but i am
beginning to despair.
Up Up and away for Edi, Abz, and Pik plus many other regional Airports
in the UK. All Gla seems to be getting is bad news.

Southwest

GLA does seem to be focussed too much on charter fligths I would have
to say, but, the management can turn things around to start attracting
airlines to GLA.
Landing fees and charges should be dropped in order to attract the
likes of SkyEurope, Centralwings, Air France to Glasgow.
The management seem to be afraid to compete with PIK


Back to top
Andrew Scotland
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 5:37 pm    Post subject: Re: Glasgow Growth Rate, 2006 Reply with quote

Quote:
Who do you propose replaces them?

The Manchester Airport Authoroty?
Glasgow city council?
PIK's owners? And make a GAA (Glasgow Airport Authoroty)
Other suggestions? BAA are doing a piss poor job now.

Quote:
Lets not forget that a large slice of Gla business over the years has
been the charter market.

Same with LGW, MAN and BHX but they still are recording good growth
rate and no reason why GLA could not reach the numbers that MAN does if
the right owers etc where in place. We need someone whos main concern
is GLA not a company than look after there London airport's first and
then a airport that gets illegal subsadies.

Interessting to look at it this way. In the summer GLA has more daily
non-European destinations than it does daily Euro's.

GLA-NYC
GLA-YYZ
GLA-PHL
GLA-ORD
GLA-SFB

GLA-AMS
GLA-CPH

This is just piss poor managment there is no excuse for no direct
flights to Paris or ANY German city. Give it 10years like this (with
BAA in charge very possible) and we could be looking at PIK becoming
Glasgow's main airport. Just look Germania a few years ago announced
PIK-TXL flights, at that time PIK was there only non main airport
served so why did they go for PIK over GLA? this is just one of
countles examples where BAA have cocked up big time.


Back to top
DavidP
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 5:43 pm    Post subject: Re: Glasgow Growth Rate, 2006 Reply with quote


sothwest wrote:
Quote:
Thats just some of the things going on but I think Glasgow will grow
between 1.5% and 2.5%. Fairly slow but without massive expansion from
an airline its not going to be much more.

Tend to agree that growth will be in the region of 1.5% to 2.5% with
the former being what I would expect and the latter and absolute best
case.

Also does anyone think Jet2
Quote:
might come to Glasgow as they currently serve EDI.

No chance of this.
Quote:


Lets not forget that a large slice of Gla business over the years has
been the charter market. A market that is reducing at this time in a
reasonably large amount. So any increase in the new routes will have to
offset the reductions in the charter market before any increase is
acheived. I have to be truthfull and say I have no idea as to whether
they will even acheive an increase this year. Not even appointed a new
boss yet, there is something wrong here I don't know what but i am
beginning to despair.
Up Up and away for Edi, Abz, and Pik plus many other regional Airports
in the UK. All Gla seems to be getting is bad news.

Southwest

someone asked who should/could replace BAA. I would love to see
infratil or the group that runs the paris airports being allowed a
shot.

David


Back to top
GLAGAZ
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 6:13 pm    Post subject: Re: Glasgow Growth Rate, 2006 Reply with quote

Well, I think it seems pretty obvious from what BAA have said that they
intend GLA to be the long haul gateway for Scotland. Yes they say EDI
will also get long haul, but from their planning it appears GLA will be
the focus airport for long haul.

If I were to be as pesemistic as you lot (in some cases I think it is
jealousy) I would say, what in the hell was the point in the
masterplan? Planning for up to 24mppa. But if I were to believe some of
the posts here GLA would struggle to pass 10 million by 2030.

There is no doubt that BAA could do a better job in attracting
airlines, but I don't see how changing the owner will achieve this. I
don't want to use a PIK style, ie piss poor airport when I'm going on a
flight. PIK is the major stumbling block for GLA in attracting new
airlines, but there is always hope.

LH have publically stated they are interested in returning to GLA.

EK could go 2x daily.

QR could start DOH.

GSM will continue to expand in Europe and other continents.

Air Berlin have started and will hopefully make some destinations
direct in future.

PIA could also make their Pakistan flights direct and up the frequency.

WW have returned to GLA on the CWL-Glasgow route.

I still believe AA will start BOS or JFK in a year or 2.

No doubt once more US majors get back on their feet and the 787/A350
come online we will see more thin long haul routes.


So shoot me for being optimistic =)

Gaz

Back to top
GKirk
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 6:20 pm    Post subject: Re: Glasgow Growth Rate, 2006 Reply with quote


GLAGAZ wrote:

Quote:
Well, I think it seems pretty obvious from what BAA have said that they
intend GLA to be the long haul gateway for Scotland. Yes they say EDI
will also get long haul, but from their planning it appears GLA will be
the focus airport for long haul.

If I were to be as pesemistic as you lot (in some cases I think it is
jealousy) I would say, what in the hell was the point in the
masterplan? Planning for up to 24mppa. But if I were to believe some of
the posts here GLA would struggle to pass 10 million by 2030.

There is no doubt that BAA could do a better job in attracting
airlines, but I don't see how changing the owner will achieve this. I
don't want to use a PIK style, ie piss poor airport when I'm going on a
flight. PIK is the major stumbling block for GLA in attracting new
airlines, but there is always hope.

LH have publically stated they are interested in returning to GLA.

EK could go 2x daily.

QR could start DOH.

GSM will continue to expand in Europe and other continents.

Air Berlin have started and will hopefully make some destinations
direct in future.

PIA could also make their Pakistan flights direct and up the frequency.

WW have returned to GLA on the CWL-Glasgow route.

I still believe AA will start BOS or JFK in a year or 2.

No doubt once more US majors get back on their feet and the 787/A350
come online we will see more thin long haul routes.


So shoot me for being optimistic =)

Gaz

Bang Bang!
You're dead ;-)


Back to top
GLAGAZ
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 6:27 pm    Post subject: Re: Glasgow Growth Rate, 2006 Reply with quote


GKirk wrote:
Quote:
GLAGAZ wrote:

Well, I think it seems pretty obvious from what BAA have said that they
intend GLA to be the long haul gateway for Scotland. Yes they say EDI
will also get long haul, but from their planning it appears GLA will be
the focus airport for long haul.

If I were to be as pesemistic as you lot (in some cases I think it is
jealousy) I would say, what in the hell was the point in the
masterplan? Planning for up to 24mppa. But if I were to believe some of
the posts here GLA would struggle to pass 10 million by 2030.

There is no doubt that BAA could do a better job in attracting
airlines, but I don't see how changing the owner will achieve this. I
don't want to use a PIK style, ie piss poor airport when I'm going on a
flight. PIK is the major stumbling block for GLA in attracting new
airlines, but there is always hope.

LH have publically stated they are interested in returning to GLA.

EK could go 2x daily.

QR could start DOH.

GSM will continue to expand in Europe and other continents.

Air Berlin have started and will hopefully make some destinations
direct in future.

PIA could also make their Pakistan flights direct and up the frequency.

WW have returned to GLA on the CWL-Glasgow route.

I still believe AA will start BOS or JFK in a year or 2.

No doubt once more US majors get back on their feet and the 787/A350
come online we will see more thin long haul routes.


So shoot me for being optimistic =)

Gaz

Bang Bang!
You're dead Wink

Lucky for me it was those rubbery dart type things that 5 year old's
fire from fake guns Wink LOL.....


Back to top
B
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 6:39 pm    Post subject: Re: Glasgow Growth Rate, 2006 Reply with quote


GLAGAZ wrote:
Quote:
Well, I think it seems pretty obvious from what BAA have said that they
intend GLA to be the long haul gateway for Scotland. Yes they say EDI
will also get long haul, but from their planning it appears GLA will be
the focus airport for long haul.

If I were to be as pesemistic as you lot (in some cases I think it is
jealousy) I would say, what in the hell was the point in the
masterplan? Planning for up to 24mppa. But if I were to believe some of
the posts here GLA would struggle to pass 10 million by 2030.

There is no doubt that BAA could do a better job in attracting
airlines, but I don't see how changing the owner will achieve this. I
don't want to use a PIK style, ie piss poor airport when I'm going on a
flight. PIK is the major stumbling block for GLA in attracting new
airlines, but there is always hope.

LH have publically stated they are interested in returning to GLA.

EK could go 2x daily.

QR could start DOH.

GSM will continue to expand in Europe and other continents.

Air Berlin have started and will hopefully make some destinations
direct in future.

PIA could also make their Pakistan flights direct and up the frequency.

WW have returned to GLA on the CWL-Glasgow route.

I still believe AA will start BOS or JFK in a year or 2.

No doubt once more US majors get back on their feet and the 787/A350
come online we will see more thin long haul routes.


So shoot me for being optimistic =)

2 words - 'PIK + RYR' = slow growth at GLA, good for the Scottish
consumer, bad for BAA GLA,
Solution, dunno.

B

B


Back to top
DavidP
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 7:01 pm    Post subject: Re: Glasgow Growth Rate, 2006 Reply with quote


GLAGAZ wrote:
Quote:
Well, I think it seems pretty obvious from what BAA have said that they
intend GLA to be the long haul gateway for Scotland. Yes they say EDI
will also get long haul, but from their planning it appears GLA will be
the focus airport for long haul.

If I were to be as pesemistic as you lot (in some cases I think it is
jealousy) I would say, what in the hell was the point in the
masterplan? Planning for up to 24mppa. But if I were to believe some of
the posts here GLA would struggle to pass 10 million by 2030.

GAZ I struggle with BAA GLA's masterplan. If GLA continues to grow at
its current rate, 2.5%, it will only handle 16.5mppa in the year 2030.
So why they are planning for 24mppa I dont know as they need to be
growing at an annual rate of slightly over 4% to get there and based on
there recent track record this just isnt doable.
Quote:

There is no doubt that BAA could do a better job in attracting
airlines, but I don't see how changing the owner will achieve this. I
don't want to use a PIK style, ie piss poor airport when I'm going on a
flight. PIK is the major stumbling block for GLA in attracting new
airlines, but there is always hope.

LH have publically stated they are interested in returning to GLA.

EK could go 2x daily.

QR could start DOH.

GSM will continue to expand in Europe and other continents.

Air Berlin have started and will hopefully make some destinations
direct in future.

PIA could also make their Pakistan flights direct and up the frequency.

WW have returned to GLA on the CWL-Glasgow route.

I still believe AA will start BOS or JFK in a year or 2.

No doubt once more US majors get back on their feet and the 787/A350
come online we will see more thin long haul routes.


So shoot me for being optimistic =)

I aint going to shoot you for being optimistic but do recommend that
you be realistic and look to BAA's track record, even if it is only
against what they are planning to and what they are currently
achieving.

Finally PIK will not go away and as long as BAA GLA do nothing about it
then GLA will continue to stagnate.

David
Personally I dont think they believe the master plan either and that is
why the will continue to do the absolute minimum at GLA that they can
get away with.
Quote:

Gaz


Back to top
Clive Braham
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 8:11 pm    Post subject: Re: Glasgow Growth Rate, 2006 Reply with quote


"GLAGAZ" <spazgaz (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
Well, I think it seems pretty obvious from what BAA have said that they
intend GLA to be the long haul gateway for Scotland. Yes they say EDI
will also get long haul, but from their planning it appears GLA will be
the focus airport for long haul.

If I were to be as pesemistic as you lot (in some cases I think it is
jealousy) I would say, what in the hell was the point in the
masterplan? Planning for up to 24mppa. But if I were to believe some of
the posts here GLA would struggle to pass 10 million by 2030.

There is no doubt that BAA could do a better job in attracting
airlines, but I don't see how changing the owner will achieve this. I
don't want to use a PIK style, ie piss poor airport when I'm going on a
flight. PIK is the major stumbling block for GLA in attracting new
airlines, but there is always hope.

LH have publically stated they are interested in returning to GLA.

EK could go 2x daily.

QR could start DOH.

GSM will continue to expand in Europe and other continents.

Air Berlin have started and will hopefully make some destinations
direct in future.

PIA could also make their Pakistan flights direct and up the frequency.

WW have returned to GLA on the CWL-Glasgow route.

I still believe AA will start BOS or JFK in a year or 2.

No doubt once more US majors get back on their feet and the 787/A350
come online we will see more thin long haul routes.


So shoot me for being optimistic =)

Gaz


No, I tend to agree. OK it's a bit of a lean spell right now but the
industry we are concerned with evolves over a longer term.

There is no reason in the world for folks to think GLA has stopped growing
terminally. Yes, other smaller airports have grown at a bigger % recently
but some of us have explained a number of times that it's easy for a tiny
airport to show a massive % rise. The masterplan only calls for an average
annual growth rate of about 4% over the next 25 years. Air travel in general
is set to double in the next 20 years and GLA will pick up it's share
naturally, not day by day but longer term. Those who can't see past the
present day's picture should try to be more realistic, and optimistic.
Things can and do change. STN no longer produces double figures and PIK is
more settled than previously. As potential new lo-co routes become saturated
from certain airports they will start reaching a bit of a plateaux, at least
compared to their boom time figures. We now see SOU and ABZ appearing to be
'top performers' amongst BAA airports for the time being but it doesn't mean
either have more air services or pax than GLA, LHR or EDI.

I'll concede that I wish BAA GLA could do more to attract more direct
services but there is no magic solution that any other operator could
impliment. They still wouldn't have a say in the growth patterns at other UK
airports which our correspondents are so hung up on. Going by their
arguements LHR is positively stagnating but a bit of realism is called for
IMO.

Clive



Back to top
DavidP
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 8:46 pm    Post subject: Re: Glasgow Growth Rate, 2006 Reply with quote

Clive,

You always use the extremes either the very small or very large
airports. Thats why I talk about its peers and compared to them it is
performing poorly, and below the 4% number called for by the master
plan with no solution in site as to remedy the sub par growth.


David

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AirTalk.org Forum Index -> Glasgow Airport All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 1 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2006 phpBB Group
SEO toolkit © 2004-2006 webmedic.