AirTalk.org Aviation discussions newsgroups   Archives   FAQ   Search   Memberlist   Usergroups   Register   Profile   Log in to check your private messages   Log in  GLA June 2004          AirTalk.org Forum Index -> Glasgow Airport View previous topic :: View next topic   Author Message BLIMPS Guest Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2004 11:59 am    Post subject: GLA June 2004 Provisional CAA Stats for June 2004 give the following load-factors for GLA flights - GLA-ORD 89% (188 pax per flight) GLA-EWR 83% (196 pax per flight) GLA-PHL 80% (160 pax per flight) GLA-DXB 56% (157 pax per flight) BLIMPS Back to top BLIMPS Guest Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2004 12:15 pm    Post subject: Re: GLA June 2004 "BLIMPS" <BLIMPS (AT) btopenworld (DOT) com> wrote Quote: Provisional CAA Stats for June 2004 give the following load-factors for GLA flights - GLA-ORD 89% (188 pax per flight) GLA-EWR 83% (196 pax per flight) GLA-PHL 80% (160 pax per flight) GLA-DXB 56% (157 pax per flight) Also GLA-YYZ had 20,848 over the month, an excellent figure of 695 pax per day using GLA to/from YYZ. BLIMPS Back to top Joe Curry Guest Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2004 12:34 pm    Post subject: Re: GLA June 2004 The message <cddonp$n1c$1 (AT) titan (DOT) btinternet.com> from "BLIMPS" <BLIMPS (AT) btopenworld (DOT) com> contains these words: Quote: Provisional CAA Stats for June 2004 give the following load-factors for GLA flights - GLA-ORD 89% (188 pax per flight) GLA-EWR 83% (196 pax per flight) GLA-PHL 80% (160 pax per flight) GLA-DXB 56% (157 pax per flight) EDI-EWR 88.8% (152.5 pax per flight) 757-200 with 172 seats. Remarkable performance given it was a new route.... -- www.edinburghairport.org.uk Edinburgh Scotland International Scotland's most convenient/accessible/profitable airport Check the aircraft images: http://www.egph.net Back to top Andrew Crawford Guest Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2004 12:55 pm    Post subject: Re: GLA June 2004 Quote: GLA-ORD 89% (188 pax per flight) GLA-EWR 83% (196 pax per flight) GLA-PHL 80% (160 pax per flight) GLA-DXB 56% (157 pax per flight) EDI-EWR 88.8% (152.5 pax per flight) 757-200 with 172 seats. Remarkable performance given it was a new route.... Excellent news all round. Hopefully this is indicative of a more general improvement in economic confidence. Andrew -- Andrew Crawford Email: acrawford <at> ieee . org Note: sender verification in use. Back to top BLIMPS Guest Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2004 3:17 pm    Post subject: Re: GLA June 2004 "Andrew Crawford" <check_signature (AT) 127 (DOT) 0.0.1> wrote Quote: GLA-ORD 89% (188 pax per flight) GLA-EWR 83% (196 pax per flight) GLA-PHL 80% (160 pax per flight) GLA-DXB 56% (157 pax per flight) EDI-EWR 88.8% (152.5 pax per flight) 757-200 with 172 seats. Remarkable performance given it was a new route.... Excellent news all round. Hopefully this is indicative of a more general improvement in economic confidence. BT server playing up again, who brought EDI into the thread Andrew? BLIMPS Back to top Joe Curry Guest Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2004 3:51 pm    Post subject: Re: Re: GLA June 2004 The message <cde4b2$mge$1 (AT) titan (DOT) btinternet.com> from "BLIMPS" <BLIMPS (AT) btopenworld (DOT) com> contains these words: Quote: Excellent news all round. Hopefully this is indicative of a more general improvement in economic confidence. BT server playing up again, who brought EDI into the thread Andrew? As Andrew said, "Excellent news all-round". -- www.edinburghairport.org.uk Edinburgh Scotland International Scotland's most convenient/accessible/profitable airport Check the aircraft images: http://www.egph.net Back to top Andrew Crawford Guest Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2004 5:04 pm    Post subject: Re: GLA June 2004 Quote: BT server playing up again, who brought EDI into the thread Andrew? Three guesses :) Andrew -- Andrew Crawford Email: acrawford <at> ieee . org Note: sender verification in use. Back to top Clive Braham Guest Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2004 5:09 pm    Post subject: Re: Re: GLA June 2004 "Joe Curry" <ability (AT) zetnet (DOT) co.uk> wrote Quote: The message <cde4b2$mge$1 (AT) titan (DOT) btinternet.com from "BLIMPS" Excellent news all round. Hopefully this is indicative of a more general improvement in economic confidence. BT server playing up again, who brought EDI into the thread Andrew? As Andrew said, "Excellent news all-round". -- Indeed. So yo are now behind GLA as well. That's progress. But what happened to your claims of overcapacity at one particular airport? Back to top John Dundas Guest Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2004 7:12 pm    Post subject: Re: GLA June 2004 "Joe Curry" <ability (AT) zetnet (DOT) co.uk> wrote Quote: EDI-EWR 88.8% (152.5 pax per flight) 757-200 with 172 seats. Remarkable performance given it was a new route.... TROLL --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system ([url]http://www.grisoft.com)[/url]. Version: 6.0.721 / Virus Database: 477 - Release Date: 16/07/2004 Back to top Clive Braham Guest Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2004 7:30 pm    Post subject: Re: GLA June 2004 "John Dundas" <j.m.dundas (AT) ggggggbtinternet (DOT) com> wrote Quote: "Joe Curry" <ability (AT) zetnet (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message news:2004071813341666937 (AT) zetnet (DOT) co.uk... EDI-EWR 88.8% (152.5 pax per flight) 757-200 with 172 seats. Remarkable performance given it was a new route.... TROLL Maybe he's having difficulty with the ng title to coin a phrase. It's about as relevant as say Jersey to Bristol unless one has an axe to grind. Back to top BLIMPS Guest Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2004 9:11 pm    Post subject: Re: GLA June 2004 "BLIMPS" <BLIMPS (AT) btopenworld (DOT) com> wrote Quote: "BLIMPS" <BLIMPS (AT) btopenworld (DOT) com> wrote in message news:cddonp$n1c$1 (AT) titan (DOT) btinternet.com... Provisional CAA Stats for June 2004 give the following load-factors for GLA flights - GLA-ORD 89% (188 pax per flight) GLA-EWR 83% (196 pax per flight) GLA-PHL 80% (160 pax per flight) GLA-DXB 56% (157 pax per flight) Also GLA-YYZ had 20,848 over the month, an excellent figure of 695 pax per day using GLA to/from YYZ. I also note the GLA-KEF route was up 36% to 5,828 for the month. BLIMPS Back to top mark devaney Guest Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2004 9:47 pm    Post subject: Re: GLA June 2004 Quote: Provisional CAA Stats for June 2004 give the following load-factors for GLA flights - GLA-ORD 89% (188 pax per flight) GLA-EWR 83% (196 pax per flight) GLA-PHL 80% (160 pax per flight) BLIMPS Given that Continental fly year round to Newark, load factors such as these will hopefully persuade AA and US to look at maintaining service year round. Back to top Clive Braham Guest Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2004 10:13 pm    Post subject: Re: GLA June 2004 "mark devaney" <md009d4088 (AT) blueyonder (DOT) co.uk> wrote Quote: Provisional CAA Stats for June 2004 give the following load-factors for GLA flights - GLA-ORD 89% (188 pax per flight) GLA-EWR 83% (196 pax per flight) GLA-PHL 80% (160 pax per flight) BLIMPS Given that Continental fly year round to Newark, load factors such as these will hopefully persuade AA and US to look at maintaining service year round. Funny you should say that. The MAN -USA loads are interesting: ATL 11110 185.17 92.12% BOS 09982 166.37 88.50% ORD 25150 209.58 91.32% JFK 10970 182.83 85.84% EWR 15295 254.92 90.08% MCO 20574 395.64 96.97% PHL 13253 220.88 83.04% IAD 10076 201.52 82.59% Thanks David Our COA EWR load looks a little less than we're used to as the competition arrive for the summer but the duplicate services are roughly on a par with MAN. Their figures would suggest that a Delta GLA-ATL service would hold it's own against the others and could be a viable next addition. Same with BOS though I'd rather ATL as it's a bit removed from the competition we already have to the North Eastern seaboard and would be ideal for the southern half of the States where there are many with Scottish roots. I always say that MAN's services are a good indicator as to what we could expect in the future as both are competing with LHR for long haul and both have similarly higher proportions of VFR/Leisure pax. Our Canadian services tend to mirror each other. Other interesting things about the MAN figures. bmi are doing well to IAD and ORD. They have doubled the ORD market by joining AA and between then achieved 91%. The competition hasn't troubled AA. The MCO figure would be high as most of the seats are sold in advance to tour operators. Back to top BLIMPS Guest Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2004 11:59 pm    Post subject: Re: GLA June 2004 "Clive Braham" <clive (AT) braham5 (DOT) freeserve.co.uk> wrote Quote: "mark devaney" <md009d4088 (AT) blueyonder (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message news:jeCKc.2878$fd7.27001913 (AT) news-text (DOT) cableinet.net... Provisional CAA Stats for June 2004 give the following load-factors for GLA flights - GLA-ORD 89% (188 pax per flight) GLA-EWR 83% (196 pax per flight) GLA-PHL 80% (160 pax per flight) BLIMPS Given that Continental fly year round to Newark, load factors such as these will hopefully persuade AA and US to look at maintaining service year round. Funny you should say that. The MAN -USA loads are interesting: ATL 11110 185.17 92.12% BOS 09982 166.37 88.50% ORD 25150 209.58 91.32% JFK 10970 182.83 85.84% EWR 15295 254.92 90.08% MCO 20574 395.64 96.97% PHL 13253 220.88 83.04% IAD 10076 201.52 82.59% Thanks David Our COA EWR load looks a little less than we're used to as the competition arrive for the summer but the duplicate services are roughly on a par with MAN. Their figures would suggest that a Delta GLA-ATL service would hold it's own against the others and could be a viable next addition. Same with BOS though I'd rather ATL as it's a bit removed from the competition we already have to the North Eastern seaboard and would be ideal for the southern half of the States where there are many with Scottish roots. I always say that MAN's services are a good indicator as to what we could expect in the future as both are competing with LHR for long haul and both have similarly higher proportions of VFR/Leisure pax. Our Canadian services tend to mirror each other. A GLA-ATL service would be a winner no doubt at all BLIMPS Back to top Display posts from previous: All Posts1 Day7 Days2 Weeks1 Month3 Months6 Months1 Year Oldest FirstNewest First         AirTalk.org Forum Index -> Glasgow Airport All times are GMT Page 1 of 1   Jump to: Select a forum Aviation----------------alt.aviationAviation safety EnhancementPlanes, gliders and flying in AustraliaAviation et pilotage (Français)rec.aviationAviation (Aerobatics)Hot air, gas balloons and airshipsHang-gliding, paragliding, foot-launched flightAircraft Design & BuildingInstrument Flight RulesAviation (Classifieds)Military AircraftNaval AviationAviation (Miscellaneous Topics)Owning AirplanesAviators (General Discussions)Aviation related productsAircraft RestorationHelicopters and rotary wing aircraftsFlight SimulationSailplanesAviation (Students)Light aircraftFlying related activities in the UK Airports----------------alt.airportsEdinburgh Airport Glasgow Airport Humberside Airport Luton Airport Aberdeen Airport Glasgow Prestwick Airport  You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2006 phpBB Group SEO toolkit © 2004-2006 webmedic.