AirTalk.org Forum Index AirTalk.org
Aviation discussions newsgroups
 
Archives   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Flying and risk - another (good) viewpoint

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AirTalk.org Forum Index -> Planes, gliders and flying in Australia
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
pix
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Dec 20, 2003 10:46 pm    Post subject: Flying and risk - another (good) viewpoint Reply with quote



This has been done to death, but I think it is worth it to post this guy's
viewpoint...

Lifted from rec.aviation.piloting (CJ Campbell):

Quote:

The risk of flying a small aircraft is directly proportional to the time
spent in the air. Overall, flying a small plane is about as risky as riding
a motorcycle. The difference between a small plane and a motorcycle is that
motorcycle riders are largely dependent on the driving skills of others
while around 90% of all airplane accidents are caused by the pilot. As a
pilot, you choose your own level of risk. Flying at night and in bad weather
increases that risk. Flying over mountains or long distances over water
increase the risk as well. Flying low, low level maneuvering such as buzzing
your friend's house, flying when you are sick or tired, flying because you
have to get there even when you know you should not fly, etc. all increase
your risk.

Unquote

My comment: about the best version of (private) flying and risk that I have
seen - this viewpoint summarises well what makes flying risky and why...

/pix


Back to top
Bill Bertram
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Dec 21, 2003 10:23 pm    Post subject: Re: Flying and risk - another (good) viewpoint Reply with quote




"pix" <pix@NOSPAM*.pacific.net.au> wrote

Quote:
This has been done to death, but I think it is worth it to post this guy's
viewpoint...

Lifted from rec.aviation.piloting (CJ Campbell):

Quote:

"The risk of flying a small aircraft is directly proportional to the time
spent in the air."


Yes, it has been done to death and this first statement is utter nonsense.
There is no statistical evidence to support it. In fact it has been pointed
out on previous occasions (also done to death) that accidents are most
likely to happen during the take-off and landing phases and that the actual
time spent in the air has very little to do with it.


Quote:
My comment: about the best version of (private) flying and risk that I
have
seen - this viewpoint summarises well what makes flying risky and why...

Rubbish!

Bill



Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AirTalk.org Forum Index -> Planes, gliders and flying in Australia All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2006 phpBB Group
SEO toolkit © 2004-2006 webmedic.