AirTalk.org Forum Index AirTalk.org
Aviation discussions newsgroups
 
Archives   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Flyglobespan
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AirTalk.org Forum Index -> Edinburgh Airport
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Joe Curry
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2003 2:43 pm    Post subject: Flyglobespan Reply with quote




Flyglobespan intends to unveil four new routes flying from Edinburgh
Airport next month.

Any guesses.?
Back to top
Callum Johnstone
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2003 5:26 pm    Post subject: Re: Flyglobespan Reply with quote




"Joe Curry" <ability (AT) zetnet (DOT) co.uk> wrote

Quote:

Flyglobespan intends to unveil four new routes flying from Edinburgh
Airport next month.

Any guesses.?

Alicante, Tenerife, Rome and Faro?



Back to top
Joe Curry
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2003 6:59 pm    Post subject: Flyglobespan Reply with quote



The message <Wm%bb.35$z37.28 (AT) news-binary (DOT) blueyonder.co.uk>
from "Callum Johnstone" <callumjohnstone (AT) blueyonder (DOT) co.uk> contains
these words:

Quote:
Any guesses.?

Alicante, Tenerife, Rome and Faro?

Could be. but cherry picking existing routes does not count toward a subsidy.

The same can be said for GLA....

There would appear to be cherry-picking there of existing charter routes.

It will end in tears at GLA but not at EDI, there is no over-capacity.

Can you see the charter airlines at GLA lying down and not throwing down
the guantlet?

Can you see PIK taking Flyglobespan's 'snub' lying down.?

The much vaunted GLA - CSA route to Prague has about as much chance now
as Concorde flying in on
the 24th October...

Rome? It's no secret that BAA have tried hard to bring Italian routes
into GLA for ages... Flyglobespan
no doubt got an offer they couldn't refuse..

Back to top
David Kerr
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2003 7:38 pm    Post subject: Re: Flyglobespan Reply with quote


"Joe Curry" <ability (AT) zetnet (DOT) co.uk> wrote

Quote:

The much vaunted GLA - CSA route to Prague has about as much chance now
as Concorde flying in on
the 24th October...



That I really doubt....flyglobespan are proposing only a 2 weekly service;
if CSA introduce services, it will be 5 weekly PLUS they are not averse to
competing with "low cost" at the same airport....they've dropped their
MAN-PRG prices to a comparable level to those which bmibaby will be
launching their own services.

David



Back to top
John Dundas
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2003 8:32 pm    Post subject: Re: Flyglobespan Reply with quote


"Joe Curry" <ability (AT) zetnet (DOT) co.uk> wrote

Quote:
The message <Wm%bb.35$z37.28 (AT) news-binary (DOT) blueyonder.co.uk
from "Callum Johnstone" these words:

Any guesses.?

Alicante, Tenerife, Rome and Faro?

Could be. but cherry picking existing routes does not count toward a
subsidy.


True. But at least its new routes and its good for charter pax who want too
fly from EDI.

Quote:
The same can be said for GLA....

Yes it can.

Quote:
There would appear to be cherry-picking there of existing charter routes.

It will end in tears at GLA but not at EDI, there is no over-capacity.

What over capacity are you talking about?


Quote:
Can you see the charter airlines at GLA lying down and not throwing down
the guantlet?

They will have too deal with it. Just like having to deal with Ryanair,
Easyjet and all the other locost airlines.

Quote:
Can you see PIK taking Flyglobespan's 'snub' lying down.?

Well its a commercial decision, just like when BA decided to pull a service
from GLA and move it to EDI, just the same idea and you did not complain
about that or indicated anything that GLA would do.


Quote:
The much vaunted GLA - CSA route to Prague has about as much chance now
as Concorde flying in on the 24th October...

And you would love that route not to go ahead..........


Quote:
Rome? It's no secret that BAA have tried hard to bring Italian routes
into GLA for ages... Flyglobespan no doubt got an offer they couldn't
refuse..


Do you have a problem with this then Joe? Your post is do damm negative with
a bit of spite in it just because GLA has got some new routes and PIK has
lost its Flyglobespan hub. Good on BAA for getting them away from PIK, WELL
DONE BAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It was not long ago you were congratulating PIK for
getting new routes but when it comes to Glasgow it seems that we see the
other side of Joe Curry come out in your posts.

JOE DONT BE SO DAMM NEGATIVE.






Back to top
John Dundas
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2003 8:49 pm    Post subject: Re: Flyglobespan Reply with quote


"David Kerr" <david.avdb (AT) lineSPAMone (DOT) SPAMnet> wrote

Quote:

That I really doubt....flyglobespan are proposing only a 2 weekly service;
if CSA introduce services, it will be 5 weekly PLUS they are not averse to
competing with "low cost" at the same airport....they've dropped their
MAN-PRG prices to a comparable level to those which bmibaby will be
launching their own services.

David

David, thanks for the well balanced reply. Joe is just so damm negative when

it comes to GLA, as we all know. I am glad too see that CSA are willing too
operate at a comparable level to the lo-costs, like you said they dont offer
a daily service which CSA do.

regards John



Back to top
fox1
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Sep 24, 2003 4:36 am    Post subject: Re: Flyglobespan Reply with quote

On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 20:38:20 +0100, "David Kerr" <david.avdb (AT) lineSPAMone (DOT) SPAMnet> wrote:

Quote:
The much vaunted GLA - CSA route to Prague has about as much chance now
as Concorde flying in on
the 24th October...

That I really doubt....flyglobespan are proposing only a 2 weekly service;
if CSA introduce services, it will be 5 weekly PLUS they are not averse to
competing with "low cost" at the same airport....

I doubt they will compete at all...:-(


Back to top
Clive Braham
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Sep 24, 2003 5:29 am    Post subject: Re: Flyglobespan Reply with quote


"Joe Curry" <ability (AT) zetnet (DOT) co.uk> wrote

Quote:
The message <Wm%bb.35$z37.28 (AT) news-binary (DOT) blueyonder.co.uk
from "Callum Johnstone" these words:

Any guesses.?

Alicante, Tenerife, Rome and Faro?

Could be. but cherry picking existing routes does not count toward a
subsidy.

The same can be said for GLA....

There would appear to be cherry-picking there of existing charter routes.

It will end in tears at GLA but not at EDI, there is no over-capacity.


Ah the expert has spoken.
Look Joe Flyglobespan flew most of the routes from PIK this summer. They are
certainly not going to attract fewer passengers by going from Glasgow
International. We are talking about cheap flights from £35+tax each way that
will encourage many "new" passengers into the air and offer previously
unheard of flexibility.


Quote:

Can you see the charter airlines at GLA lying down and not throwing down
the guantlet?

Excellent news - more competition = cheaper seats for all.


Quote:

Can you see PIK taking Flyglobespan's 'snub' lying down.?

What will they do, do you think? Pay airlines to fly from PIK? After all
they couldn't get much cheaper.

PIK may have shot themselves in the foot by bowing to Ryanair's demands.


Quote:

The much vaunted GLA - CSA route to Prague has about as much chance now
as Concorde flying in on
the 24th October...

In your dreams....


Quote:

Rome? It's no secret that BAA have tried hard to bring Italian routes
into GLA for ages... Flyglobespan
no doubt got an offer they couldn't refuse..

Yes indeed. Well done BAA Scottish Airports. A great bit of business.



Back to top
Adrian Tupper
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Sep 24, 2003 6:40 am    Post subject: Re: Flyglobespan Reply with quote

"Callum Johnstone" <callumjohnstone (AT) blueyonder (DOT) co.uk> wrote in news:Wm%
bb.35$z37.28 (AT) news-binary (DOT) blueyonder.co.uk:

Quote:

"Joe Curry" <ability (AT) zetnet (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message
news:2003092315432066937 (AT) zetnet (DOT) co.uk...

Flyglobespan intends to unveil four new routes flying from Edinburgh
Airport next month.

Any guesses.?

Alicante, Tenerife, Rome and Faro?



I can't think of anywhere more likely than these. Especially Faro.
Unless Paphos or Larnaca is an option.

--
Adrian

Back to top
fox1
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Sep 24, 2003 7:17 am    Post subject: Re: Flyglobespan Reply with quote

On 24 Sep 2003 06:40:08 GMT, Adrian Tupper <adrian.tupper (AT) totalise (DOT) co.uk> wrote:

Quote:
I can't think of anywhere more likely than these. Especially Faro.
Unless Paphos or Larnaca is an option.

I doubt we can expect sensible city destinations than those already covered by charter flights...


Back to top
John Dundas
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Sep 24, 2003 7:29 am    Post subject: Re: Flyglobespan Reply with quote


"fox1" <fox1 (AT) NOSPAMedinburghairport (DOT) org.uk> wrote

Quote:
On 24 Sep 2003 06:40:08 GMT, Adrian Tupper wrote:

I can't think of anywhere more likely than these. Especially Faro.
Unless Paphos or Larnaca is an option.

I doubt we can expect sensible city destinations than those already
covered by charter flights...


Joe, you shout your mouth off at the lack of charter flights from EDI and
complain bitterly about East coast pax having too travel to GLA to get their
flights, now that Flyglobespan is going too introduce more flights and its
certainly aimed at the charter type pax, you seem to be complaining about
where they are going and you want "sensible city destinations".

Basically Joe you cant have everything the way that you want it, be happy
that EDI has secured even more routes and its giving East coast pax a better
choice for them going on holiday from their LOCAL airport. I think that your
just a bit bitter due to the fact that GLA has picked up new routes. If
these routes were only going from EDI you would be having a party.

EDI does not want too continue to get all these business pax type routes, it
needs charter routes as well, just like GLA does not want too continue to
get all these charter type routes, it needs business routes as well.

If you want EDI to have sensible city destinations then you will not want
Ryanair to fly from the airport and you will not want the charter pax then.
Fine send them all to GLA as it seems you want some sort of categorisation
at EDI and GLA then.

Well done Flyglobespan and BAA for these new routes.

regards John



Back to top
Joe Curry
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Sep 24, 2003 7:44 am    Post subject: Flyglobespan Reply with quote

The message <bkqalr$jlc$1 (AT) hercules (DOT) btinternet.com>
from "John Dundas" <j.m.dundas (AT) btinternet (DOT) spamcom> contains these words:

Quote:
It will end in tears at GLA but not at EDI, there is no over-capacity.

What over capacity are you talking about?

I can see it's a waste of time talking to you..GLA has umpteen charter
destinations that
you haven't noticed.?

The rest of your reply is the same Hyperbolistic nonsense....

Back to top
Joe Curry
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Sep 24, 2003 7:49 am    Post subject: Flyglobespan Reply with quote

The message <bkqe17$4ec$1 (AT) newsg4 (DOT) svr.pol.co.uk>
from "Clive Braham" <clive (AT) braham5 (DOT) freeserve.co.uk> contains these words:


Quote:
Ah the expert has spoken.
Look Joe Flyglobespan flew most of the routes from PIK this summer. They are
certainly not going to attract fewer passengers by going from Glasgow
International. We are talking about cheap flights from £35+tax each way that
will encourage many "new" passengers into the air and offer previously
unheard of flexibility.


**NEW***? Where do Globespan expect these **NEW** pax with disposable incomes
coming from? Edinburgh ? I think Edinburgh folk would want to fly from
their own airport.

We are talking **SOME** return fares of around £100.. most will be much
higher.

Edinburgh folk have surface travel premiums and inconvenience to add to
the final cost.

Times have changed Clive...folk are wising-up.

Back to top
Joe Curry
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Sep 24, 2003 8:03 am    Post subject: Flyglobespan Reply with quote

The message <bkrh5m$2s9$1 (AT) sparta (DOT) btinternet.com>
from "John Dundas" <j.m.dundas (AT) btinternet (DOT) spamcom> contains these words:


Quote:
Well done Flyglobespan and BAA for these new routes.


But you will keep on posting anti-EDI/Edinburgh Evening Times articles
to the Glasgow group...?

If you were sincere about SCOTTISH you would set an example, meantime
you come across as a
Hypocritical Bigot. :-(

Back to top
Joe Curry
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Sep 24, 2003 3:05 pm    Post subject: Flyglobespan Reply with quote

The message <bkrtro$610$2 (AT) news7 (DOT) svr.pol.co.uk>
from "Clive Braham" <clive (AT) braham5 (DOT) freeserve.co.uk> contains these words:

Quote:
Plus Glasgow is the number 3 UK destination for
visitors

I very much doubt it.... More spin.?

You are opening a can of worms again....

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AirTalk.org Forum Index -> Edinburgh Airport All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 1 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2006 phpBB Group
SEO toolkit © 2004-2006 webmedic.