AirTalk.org Forum Index AirTalk.org
Aviation discussions newsgroups
 
Archives   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FlyGlobespan beat CSA + EDI getting 3 extra CSA flights

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AirTalk.org Forum Index -> Glasgow Airport
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
GLAGAZ
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:17 pm    Post subject: FlyGlobespan beat CSA + EDI getting 3 extra CSA flights Reply with quote



LOW-COST airline flyglobespan has won a David and Goliath battle to
dominate flights between Glasgow and Prague.

http://www.eveningtimes.co.uk/hi/news/5040819.html

Gaz

Back to top
Andrew Scotland
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:25 pm    Post subject: Re: FlyGlobespan beat CSA + EDI getting 3 extra CSA flights Reply with quote



"Glasgow passengers who have booked after August 1 will be asked to fly
from Edinburgh."

Where offered “Go to Edinburgh or take a full refund” they took the
refund and booked up with FlyGlobespan from Glasgow for the same dates.

Back to top
Andrew Scotland
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:28 pm    Post subject: Re: FlyGlobespan beat CSA + EDI getting 3 extra CSA flights Reply with quote



"Glasgow passengers who have booked after August 1 will be asked to fly

from Edinburgh." Someone will think all his birthdays and Christmases
have came at once.

Close family Where offered “Go to Edinburgh or take a full refund” they
took the refund and booked up with FlyGlobespan from Glasgow for the
same dates.

Back to top
GLAGAZ
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 6:02 pm    Post subject: Re: FlyGlobespan beat CSA + EDI getting 3 extra CSA flights Reply with quote

Good to see BAA in talks with GSM to increase the capacity on the
route. Although maybe another daily service to somewhere like BUD may
provide a nice alternative??

Gaz

Back to top
Iain
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 6:06 pm    Post subject: Re: FlyGlobespan beat CSA + EDI getting 3 extra CSA flights Reply with quote

"Mr Dalrymple was furious when the Scottish Executive announced it would
help pay Czech Airlines' landing fees through its route development fund"

So presumably GSM have never had anything - seems a bit rough. The reasons
given not to give anything to them must have been pretty flimsy - I'm
surprised they didn't go to the courts!

The news that they are increasing flights at EDI seems to make sense. They
are relatively established at EDI and GSM are in position of being the new
entry to the market, which maybe gives OK the advantage. I think GSM miught
not last that long at EDI if OK do fight!


Back to top
Andrew Scotland
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 6:36 pm    Post subject: Re: FlyGlobespan beat CSA + EDI getting 3 extra CSA flights Reply with quote



Iain wrote:
Quote:
"Mr Dalrymple was furious when the Scottish Executive announced it would
help pay Czech Airlines' landing fees through its route development fund"

So presumably GSM have never had anything - seems a bit rough. The reasons
given not to give anything to them must have been pretty flimsy - I'm
surprised they didn't go to the courts!

The news that they are increasing flights at EDI seems to make sense. They
are relatively established at EDI and GSM are in position of being the new
entry to the market, which maybe gives OK the advantage. I think GSM miught
not last that long at EDI if OK do fight!

I still think OK will be the airline to pull EDI-PRG, hey are the
airline not making money on the route and in general GSM are much
better known


Back to top
Andrew Scotland
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 6:36 pm    Post subject: Re: FlyGlobespan beat CSA + EDI getting 3 extra CSA flights Reply with quote



Iain wrote:
Quote:
"Mr Dalrymple was furious when the Scottish Executive announced it would
help pay Czech Airlines' landing fees through its route development fund"

So presumably GSM have never had anything - seems a bit rough. The reasons
given not to give anything to them must have been pretty flimsy - I'm
surprised they didn't go to the courts!

The news that they are increasing flights at EDI seems to make sense. They
are relatively established at EDI and GSM are in position of being the new
entry to the market, which maybe gives OK the advantage. I think GSM miught
not last that long at EDI if OK do fight!

I still think OK will be the airline to pull EDI-PRG, hey are the
airline not making money on the route and in general GSM are much
better known


Back to top
Andrew Scotland
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 6:36 pm    Post subject: Re: FlyGlobespan beat CSA + EDI getting 3 extra CSA flights Reply with quote



Iain wrote:
Quote:
"Mr Dalrymple was furious when the Scottish Executive announced it would
help pay Czech Airlines' landing fees through its route development fund"

So presumably GSM have never had anything - seems a bit rough. The reasons
given not to give anything to them must have been pretty flimsy - I'm
surprised they didn't go to the courts!

The news that they are increasing flights at EDI seems to make sense. They
are relatively established at EDI and GSM are in position of being the new
entry to the market, which maybe gives OK the advantage. I think GSM miught
not last that long at EDI if OK do fight!

I still think OK will be the airline to pull EDI-PRG, hey are the
airline not making money on the route and in general GSM are much
better known


Back to top
Iain
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 7:15 pm    Post subject: Re: FlyGlobespan beat CSA + EDI getting 3 extra CSA flights Reply with quote


"Andrew Scotland" <andy1l (AT) aol (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:


Iain wrote:
"Mr Dalrymple was furious when the Scottish Executive announced it would
help pay Czech Airlines' landing fees through its route development
fund"

So presumably GSM have never had anything - seems a bit rough. The
reasons
given not to give anything to them must have been pretty flimsy - I'm
surprised they didn't go to the courts!

The news that they are increasing flights at EDI seems to make sense.
They
are relatively established at EDI and GSM are in position of being the
new
entry to the market, which maybe gives OK the advantage. I think GSM
miught
not last that long at EDI if OK do fight!

I still think OK will be the airline to pull EDI-PRG, hey are the
airline not making money on the route and in general GSM are much
better known


Do you know why your post has appeared 3 times - or is it just me?

As I said, in the case of EDI, OK are the established operator and GSM have
only been going 2 or 3 months - OK are in a much stronger position to fight
at EDI than they were at GLA (where daily service started at the same time -
indeed, GSM were first on the route with their 2x weekly service) and may
well have more success in doing so. If they are seriously considering
pulling the route, it will be at leaset 6 months yet, whilst they wait to
see who is gaining the upper hand.

We have seen since last winter a situation where there was a bit of
overcapacity (and low fares) GLA-PRG. Now GSM have "won" and capacity has
dropped to more realisitic levels (although maybe 3 or 4 extra GSM flights
from GLA a week would be useful). It is funny, as I think it appears that
exactly the same kind of fight is going to take place at EDI over the next
6-12 months, with the accompanying overcapacity and low fares, and this time
next year the same type of outcome will probably occur, with someone pulling
off the route, leaving more sensible capacity and fares.



Back to top
Andrew Scotland
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 7:33 pm    Post subject: Re: FlyGlobespan beat CSA + EDI getting 3 extra CSA flights Reply with quote

My name has appeared 3 times here but the message only once no idea why
though anyone got an idea why?

Agreed Iain someone will pull put and my guess is it will be CSA for
the following reasons.
1. Although CSA have been operating Edinbrugh-Prague allot longer than
FlyGlobespan have, FlyGlobespan have a much bigger name in Edinburgh
and indeed the whole of Scotland for that matter so people looking to
get cheap flights (not necessarily to Prague just anywhere for a
weekend etc.) are more likely to log onto www.flyglobespan.com than
they are to CSA's website and when people are looking for cheap flights
with GSM to any other of there EDI destionations from EDIthey will see
they are now flying EDI-PRG so i think GSM will get more exposure for
this new route than CSA have had in Glasgow and Edinburgh together.

Back to top
Callum Johnstone
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Jul 07, 2005 7:18 am    Post subject: Re: FlyGlobespan beat CSA + EDI getting 3 extra CSA flights Reply with quote


"Andrew Scotland" <andy1l (AT) aol (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:


Iain wrote:
"Mr Dalrymple was furious when the Scottish Executive announced it would
help pay Czech Airlines' landing fees through its route development
fund"

So presumably GSM have never had anything - seems a bit rough. The
reasons
given not to give anything to them must have been pretty flimsy - I'm
surprised they didn't go to the courts!

The news that they are increasing flights at EDI seems to make sense.
They
are relatively established at EDI and GSM are in position of being the
new
entry to the market, which maybe gives OK the advantage. I think GSM
miught
not last that long at EDI if OK do fight!

I still think OK will be the airline to pull EDI-PRG, hey are the
airline not making money on the route and in general GSM are much
better known

The GSM flights from EDI to PRG only started at the end of May, so I'd be
surprised at this stage if they were outperforming CSA at EDI.

CSA have had more time to establish themselves at EDI. I think they'll hold
their own, to be honest.



Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AirTalk.org Forum Index -> Glasgow Airport All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2006 phpBB Group
SEO toolkit © 2004-2006 webmedic.