 |
AirTalk.org Aviation discussions newsgroups
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Cub Driver Guest
|
Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 10:53 am Post subject: Flyboys? |
|
|
I just picked up a copy of Flyboys at BJ's Wholesale Club. Read the
first two chapters last night.
I was amazed that the author uses the term Flyboys throughout the
book, or at least throughout the first chapter. I'd assumed it was
just a cute title, but no: "Flyboys were over Chici Jima" etc.
When I was growing up--which was about the time of these
events--"flyboy" was a derisive name. It's what a ground-pounder would
say when he complained about the soft life pilots (indeed air crews)
had, compared to the infantry in the mud.
Anyone else ever heard it this way? Any mllitary pilots here ever
refer to themselves as flyboys or Flyboys?
Thanks!
all the best -- Dan Ford
email: [email]cubdriver (AT) operamail (DOT) com[/email]
see the Warbird's Forum at www.warbirdforum.com
and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
C Knowles Guest
|
Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 12:21 pm Post subject: Re: Flyboys? |
|
|
Nope, but I have had it thrown in my face once or twice. By a ground
pounder.
Curt
"Cub Driver" <pipercubforum (AT) eudoramail (DOT) com> wrote
| Quote: |
I just picked up a copy of Flyboys at BJ's Wholesale Club. Read the
first two chapters last night.
I was amazed that the author uses the term Flyboys throughout the
book, or at least throughout the first chapter. I'd assumed it was
just a cute title, but no: "Flyboys were over Chici Jima" etc.
When I was growing up--which was about the time of these
events--"flyboy" was a derisive name. It's what a ground-pounder would
say when he complained about the soft life pilots (indeed air crews)
had, compared to the infantry in the mud.
Anyone else ever heard it this way? Any mllitary pilots here ever
refer to themselves as flyboys or Flyboys?
Thanks!
all the best -- Dan Ford
email: [email]cubdriver (AT) operamail (DOT) com[/email]
see the Warbird's Forum at www.warbirdforum.com
and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dudley Henriques Guest
|
Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 3:03 pm Post subject: Re: Flyboys? |
|
|
"Cub Driver" <pipercubforum (AT) eudoramail (DOT) com> wrote
| Quote: |
I just picked up a copy of Flyboys at BJ's Wholesale Club. Read the
first two chapters last night.
I was amazed that the author uses the term Flyboys throughout the
book, or at least throughout the first chapter. I'd assumed it was
just a cute title, but no: "Flyboys were over Chici Jima" etc.
When I was growing up--which was about the time of these
events--"flyboy" was a derisive name. It's what a ground-pounder would
say when he complained about the soft life pilots (indeed air crews)
had, compared to the infantry in the mud.
Anyone else ever heard it this way? Any mllitary pilots here ever
refer to themselves as flyboys or Flyboys?
|
Well, I realize you have asked for a "military pilot's" opinion, but
considering everything involved with how that relates to me, I'll answer the
post anyway
I just finished the book. My reaction was similar to yours, but slightly
different perhaps.
The term itself was quite common as you know back during the war. It was
used by the pounders and civilians as well. I remember my mother using the
term on occasion.
As for the Bradley; if I was reviewing the book, ( I don't "review" books
any more I would come away with the feeling that he is overusing the
term both in the book as you have noted, and as well by assigning it through
inference if nothing else in a completely naval context, which in my opinion
is incorrect. I believe the use of the term was generic in assignment.
Dudley Henriques
International Fighter Pilots Fellowship
Commercial Pilot/ CFI Retired
For personal email, please replace
the z's with e's.
dhenriquesATzarthlinkDOTnzt
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dudley Henriques Guest
|
Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 3:56 pm Post subject: Re: Flyboys? |
|
|
"George Z. Bush" <georgezbush (AT) charter (DOT) net.nospam> wrote
| Quote: |
"Cub Driver" <pipercubforum (AT) eudoramail (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:hpottvgfmssfb17jigm8ldv50k1nd2p2cb (AT) 4ax (DOT) com...
I just picked up a copy of Flyboys at BJ's Wholesale Club. Read the
first two chapters last night.
I was amazed that the author uses the term Flyboys throughout the
book, or at least throughout the first chapter. I'd assumed it was
just a cute title, but no: "Flyboys were over Chici Jima" etc.
When I was growing up--which was about the time of these
events--"flyboy" was a derisive name. It's what a ground-pounder would
say when he complained about the soft life pilots (indeed air crews)
had, compared to the infantry in the mud.
Anyone else ever heard it this way? Any mllitary pilots here ever
refer to themselves as flyboys or Flyboys?
Thanks!
all the best -- Dan Ford
email: [email]cubdriver (AT) operamail (DOT) com[/email]
see the Warbird's Forum at www.warbirdforum.com
and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com
We may differ on other subjects, we we sure as hell don't differ on this
one. I
was a pilot during WWII, the Korean War, and the Viet Nam war, and I never
once
called myself or thought of myself as a "flyboy". The people I flew with
may
have been young, but they were men, and the overwhelming majority of them
didn't
even vaguely resemble the irresponsible bird-brains that the term infers.
It
may very well be what the green-eyed ground pounders called us, but
usually not
to our faces, particularly if we outranked them. I always looked on that
term
as a put down, however mistaken it might have been.
When the book first came out and got public attention, I mentioned this to
my
wife, and she told me that she thought I was making too much of it. I'm
glad to
learn that there are at least two of us who think otherwise.
BTW, I haven't read the book nor do I plan to. If he got that wrong, I
can't
help but think that the rest of his book is probably full of other things
that
he didn't quite get right.
George Z.
|
Although I'm sure there were those who might have used this term in a
derogatory way, it should be noted that the term itself is so generic that
it's use was certainly not limited to a negative context alone.
I'm fairly certain that there were many who used this term in an extremely
positive sense as the term related to them personally, and their positive
feelings about those who were fighting above them or for them, and in many
cases, protecting them.
I know that in my years of association with those who have flown in harm's
way, I can't remember anyone having a violent reaction to the term.
Dudley Henriques
International Fighter Pilots Fellowship
Commercial Pilot/ CFI Retired
For personal email, please replace
the z's with e's.
dhenriquesATzarthlinkDOTnzt
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ArtKramr Guest
|
Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 3:59 pm Post subject: Re: Flyboys? |
|
|
| Quote: | Subject: Re: Flyboys?
From: "Dudley Henriques" [email]dhenriques (AT) nowhere (DOT) net[/email]
Date: 12/16/03 7:03 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <n9FDb.1136$Ts5.299 (AT) newsread2 (DOT) news.atl.earthlink.net
"Cub Driver"
news:hpottvgfmssfb17jigm8ldv50k1nd2p2cb (AT) 4ax (DOT) com...
I just picked up a copy of Flyboys at BJ's Wholesale Club. Read the
first two chapters last night.
I was amazed that the author uses the term Flyboys throughout the
book, or at least throughout the first chapter. I'd assumed it was
just a cute title, but no: "Flyboys were over Chici Jima" etc.
When I was growing up--which was about the time of these
events--"flyboy" was a derisive name. It's what a ground-pounder would
say when he complained about the soft life pilots (indeed air crews)
had, compared to the infantry in the mud.
Anyone else ever heard it this way? Any mllitary pilots here ever
refer to themselves as flyboys or Flyboys?
Well, I realize you have asked for a "military pilot's" opinion, but
considering everything involved with how that relates to me, I'll answer the
post anyway
I just finished the book. My reaction was similar to yours, but slightly
different perhaps.
The term itself was quite common as you know back during the war. It was
used by the pounders and civilians as well. I remember my mother using the
term on occasion.
As for the Bradley; if I was reviewing the book, ( I don't "review" books
any more I would come away with the feeling that he is overusing the
term both in the book as you have noted, and as well by assigning it through
inference if nothing else in a completely naval context, which in my opinion
is incorrect. I believe the use of the term was generic in assignment.
Dudley Henriques
International Fighter Pilots Fellowship
Commercial Pilot/ CFI Retired
For personal email, please replace
the z's with e's.
dhenriquesATzarthlinkDOTnzt
Right you are Dudley. Flyboys was ususally a term of admiration and envy. The |
best, the brightest and the chosen. The elite of the armed forces. Of course
tone of voice could mitigate that And it applied to all who flew, not just
pilots., Ground pounders applied to infantry. But those in an AAC squadron who
were not on flying status were called "Paddlefeet" I think the guy who wrote
Flyboys knew whereof he spoke
Regards,
Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ArtKramr Guest
|
Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 4:17 pm Post subject: Re: Flyboys? |
|
|
| Quote: | Subject: Re: Flyboys?
From: "C Knowles" [email]cknowles (AT) prodigy (DOT) net[/email]
Date: 12/16/03 4:21 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <bNCDb.36926$UR6.3269 (AT) newssvr32 (DOT) news.prodigy.com
Nope, but I have had it thrown in my face once or twice. By a ground
pounder.
Curt
"Cub Driver"
news:hpottvgfmssfb17jigm8ldv50k1nd2p2cb (AT) 4ax (DOT) com...
I just picked up a copy of Flyboys at BJ's Wholesale Club. Read the
first two chapters last night.
I was amazed that the author uses the term Flyboys throughout the
book, or at least throughout the first chapter. I'd assumed it was
just a cute title, but no: "Flyboys were over Chici Jima" etc.
When I was growing up--which was about the time of these
events--"flyboy" was a derisive name. It's what a ground-pounder would
say when he complained about the soft life pilots (indeed air crews)
had, compared to the infantry in the mud.
Anyone else ever heard it this way? Any mllitary pilots here ever
refer to themselves as flyboys or Flyboys?
Thanks!
all the best -- Dan Ford
email: [email]cubdriver (AT) operamail (DOT) com[/email]
see the Warbird's Forum at www.warbirdforum.com
and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com
|
Flyboy was a term of admiration and envy. Of course tone of voice had
something to do with it too.
Regards,
Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dudley Henriques Guest
|
Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 4:28 pm Post subject: Re: Flyboys? |
|
|
"ArtKramr" <artkramr (AT) aol (DOT) com> wrote
| Quote: | Subject: Re: Flyboys?
From: "Dudley Henriques" [email]dhenriques (AT) nowhere (DOT) net[/email]
Date: 12/16/03 7:03 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <n9FDb.1136$Ts5.299 (AT) newsread2 (DOT) news.atl.earthlink.net
"Cub Driver"
news:hpottvgfmssfb17jigm8ldv50k1nd2p2cb (AT) 4ax (DOT) com...
I just picked up a copy of Flyboys at BJ's Wholesale Club. Read the
first two chapters last night.
I was amazed that the author uses the term Flyboys throughout the
book, or at least throughout the first chapter. I'd assumed it was
just a cute title, but no: "Flyboys were over Chici Jima" etc.
When I was growing up--which was about the time of these
events--"flyboy" was a derisive name. It's what a ground-pounder would
say when he complained about the soft life pilots (indeed air crews)
had, compared to the infantry in the mud.
Anyone else ever heard it this way? Any mllitary pilots here ever
refer to themselves as flyboys or Flyboys?
Well, I realize you have asked for a "military pilot's" opinion, but
considering everything involved with how that relates to me, I'll answer
the
post anyway
I just finished the book. My reaction was similar to yours, but slightly
different perhaps.
The term itself was quite common as you know back during the war. It was
used by the pounders and civilians as well. I remember my mother using
the
term on occasion.
As for the Bradley; if I was reviewing the book, ( I don't "review" books
any more I would come away with the feeling that he is overusing the
term both in the book as you have noted, and as well by assigning it
through
inference if nothing else in a completely naval context, which in my
opinion
is incorrect. I believe the use of the term was generic in assignment.
Dudley Henriques
International Fighter Pilots Fellowship
Commercial Pilot/ CFI Retired
For personal email, please replace
the z's with e's.
dhenriquesATzarthlinkDOTnzt
Right you are Dudley. Flyboys was ususally a term of admiration and
envy. The
best, the brightest and the chosen. The elite of the armed forces. Of
course
tone of voice could mitigate that And it applied to all who flew, not
just
pilots., Ground pounders applied to infantry. But those in an AAC squadron
who
were not on flying status were called "Paddlefeet" I think the guy who
wrote
Flyboys knew whereof he spoke
Regards,
|
I think the term "flyboys" is indicative of many of like terms that sprung
up throughout the war. I believe you are absolutely correct in saying that
any meaning or connotation attached to such terms would have to include
exactly who was using the term and the context under which the term was
being used. To arbitrarily assign either a positive or negative meaning to
such a term without context being involved is in my judgment incorrect. On
one hand, you can have a disgruntled soldier looking up into the sky saying
to his buddy, "Flyboys are over rated idiots!". Then on the other hand you
have a woman standing on a London street corner in her bombed out
neighborhood watching a Spit dispatching a Ju88 muttering to herself, "Thank
GOD for the flyboys!" Both are valid uses of the term; one is negative, one
positive. It's just that kind of thing......a slang expression that brings
one closer to what one might not have the "right" words to express......a
way of expressing an intimate contact where intimate contact might not
exist.
I do believe that Bradley really overworked the term in "Flyboys".
His continuous use of the term throughout the book reminded me of some of
these rock groups where the group seemingly finds a chord or harmony run
that sounds REAL good to them, so they work it over and over and over and
over and over.....until it's been done so many times that the initial
benefit on the ear has been lost through sheer repetition.
Dudley Henriques
International Fighter Pilots Fellowship
Commercial Pilot/ CFI Retired
For personal email, please replace
the z's with e's.
dhenriquesATzarthlinkDOTnzt
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Yeff Guest
|
Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 4:34 pm Post subject: Re: Flyboys? |
|
|
On 16 Dec 2003 16:17:44 GMT, ArtKramr wrote:
| Quote: | Flyboy was a term of admiration and envy. Of course tone of voice had
something to do with it too.
|
Sort of like when your TI in basic training calls you "hero..."
("What are you, some type of he-ro?")
-Jeff B.
yeff at erols dot com
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ArtKramr Guest
|
Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 4:39 pm Post subject: Re: Flyboys? |
|
|
| Quote: | Subject: Re: Flyboys?
From: "Dudley Henriques" [email]dhenriques (AT) nowhere (DOT) net[/email]
Date: 12/16/03 8:28 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <DoGDb.1232$Ts5.721 (AT) newsread2 (DOT) news.atl.earthlink.net
"ArtKramr"
news:20031216105937.14167.00001113 (AT) mb-m28 (DOT) aol.com...
Subject: Re: Flyboys?
From: "Dudley Henriques" [email]dhenriques (AT) nowhere (DOT) net[/email]
Date: 12/16/03 7:03 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <n9FDb.1136$Ts5.299 (AT) newsread2 (DOT) news.atl.earthlink.net
"Cub Driver"
news:hpottvgfmssfb17jigm8ldv50k1nd2p2cb (AT) 4ax (DOT) com...
I just picked up a copy of Flyboys at BJ's Wholesale Club. Read the
first two chapters last night.
I was amazed that the author uses the term Flyboys throughout the
book, or at least throughout the first chapter. I'd assumed it was
just a cute title, but no: "Flyboys were over Chici Jima" etc.
When I was growing up--which was about the time of these
events--"flyboy" was a derisive name. It's what a ground-pounder would
say when he complained about the soft life pilots (indeed air crews)
had, compared to the infantry in the mud.
Anyone else ever heard it this way? Any mllitary pilots here ever
refer to themselves as flyboys or Flyboys?
Well, I realize you have asked for a "military pilot's" opinion, but
considering everything involved with how that relates to me, I'll answer
the
post anyway
I just finished the book. My reaction was similar to yours, but slightly
different perhaps.
The term itself was quite common as you know back during the war. It was
used by the pounders and civilians as well. I remember my mother using
the
term on occasion.
As for the Bradley; if I was reviewing the book, ( I don't "review" books
any more I would come away with the feeling that he is overusing the
term both in the book as you have noted, and as well by assigning it
through
inference if nothing else in a completely naval context, which in my
opinion
is incorrect. I believe the use of the term was generic in assignment.
Dudley Henriques
International Fighter Pilots Fellowship
Commercial Pilot/ CFI Retired
For personal email, please replace
the z's with e's.
dhenriquesATzarthlinkDOTnzt
Right you are Dudley. Flyboys was ususally a term of admiration and
envy. The
best, the brightest and the chosen. The elite of the armed forces. Of
course
tone of voice could mitigate that And it applied to all who flew, not
just
pilots., Ground pounders applied to infantry. But those in an AAC squadron
who
were not on flying status were called "Paddlefeet" I think the guy who
wrote
Flyboys knew whereof he spoke
Regards,
I think the term "flyboys" is indicative of many of like terms that sprung
up throughout the war. I believe you are absolutely correct in saying that
any meaning or connotation attached to such terms would have to include
exactly who was using the term and the context under which the term was
being used. To arbitrarily assign either a positive or negative meaning to
such a term without context being involved is in my judgment incorrect. On
one hand, you can have a disgruntled soldier looking up into the sky saying
to his buddy, "Flyboys are over rated idiots!". Then on the other hand you
have a woman standing on a London street corner in her bombed out
neighborhood watching a Spit dispatching a Ju88 muttering to herself, "Thank
GOD for the flyboys!" Both are valid uses of the term; one is negative, one
positive. It's just that kind of thing......a slang expression that brings
one closer to what one might not have the "right" words to express......a
way of expressing an intimate contact where intimate contact might not
exist.
I do believe that Bradley really overworked the term in "Flyboys".
His continuous use of the term throughout the book reminded me of some of
these rock groups where the group seemingly finds a chord or harmony run
that sounds REAL good to them, so they work it over and over and over and
over and over.....until it's been done so many times that the initial
benefit on the ear has been lost through sheer repetition.
Dudley Henriques
International Fighter Pilots Fellowship
Commercial Pilot/ CFI Retired
For personal email, please replace
the z's with e's.
dhenriquesATzarthlinkDOTnzt
|
Flyboys was often used with a warm element of effection attached to it.
Regards,
Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ArtKramr Guest
|
Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 4:41 pm Post subject: Re: Flyboys? |
|
|
| Quote: | Subject: Re: Flyboys?
From: Yeff [email]zoomie (AT) fastmail (DOT) fm[/email]
Date: 12/16/03 8:34 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:
On 16 Dec 2003 16:17:44 GMT, ArtKramr wrote:
Flyboy was a term of admiration and envy. Of course tone of voice had
something to do with it too.
Sort of like when your TI in basic training calls you "hero..."
("What are you, some type of he-ro?")
-Jeff B.
yeff at erols dot com
|
Yeah. That too. (grin)
Regards,
Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chris Mark Guest
|
Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 7:11 pm Post subject: Re: Flyboys? |
|
|
Flyboys was a generic term for aircrew. You might hear it used when you went
into a cafe in your uniform and sat down at the counter. The waitress, handing
you a menu, would say, "Hiya, flyboy!"
Or you might be at a train station trying to get transportation and the ticket
booth guy might turn to somebody and say, "Hey, I got a bunch of flyboys here
who need to get to Greenville."
No offense intended or implied.
The term is beaten into the ground in the book.
Just for the hell of it, I looked in a dictionary of slang to see if the term
is there. It is. The entry says, in part, "An aviator, esp. a glamorous,
heroic or daring aviator. In WWII usu. used ironically. Now derog., implying
snobbishness, youth and cautiousness."
Chris Mark
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dudley Henriques Guest
|
Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 7:17 pm Post subject: Re: Flyboys? |
|
|
"Chris Mark" <xmarx467 (AT) aol (DOT) compost> wrote
| Quote: | The entry says, in part, "An aviator, esp. a glamorous,
heroic or daring aviator".
|
Yup!! That would be the right one all right!!!! )))
Dudley Henriques
International Fighter Pilots Fellowship
Commercial Pilot/ CFI Retired
For personal email, please replace
the z's with e's.
dhenriquesATzarthlinkDOTnzt
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ArtKramr Guest
|
Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 7:19 pm Post subject: Re: Flyboys? |
|
|
| Quote: | Subject: Re: Flyboys?
From: "Dudley Henriques" [email]dhenriques (AT) nowhere (DOT) net[/email]
Date: 12/16/03 11:17 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <7TIDb.486$wL6.170 (AT) newsread1 (DOT) news.atl.earthlink.net
"Chris Mark"
news:20031216141129.16134.00000559 (AT) mb-m22 (DOT) aol.com...
The entry says, in part, "An aviator, esp. a glamorous,
heroic or daring aviator".
Yup!! That would be the right one all right!!!! )))
Dudley Henriques
International Fighter Pilots Fellowship
Commercial Pilot/ CFI Retired
For personal email, please replace
the z's with e's.
dhenriquesATzarthlinkDOTnzt
|
Aw shucks. Tweren't nuthin'. (shy grin)
Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
John R Weiss Guest
|
Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 7:36 pm Post subject: Re: Flyboys? |
|
|
"Chris Mark" <xmarx467 (AT) aol (DOT) compost> wrote...
| Quote: | Flyboys was a generic term for aircrew. You might hear it used when you went
into a cafe in your uniform and sat down at the counter. The waitress,
handing
you a menu, would say, "Hiya, flyboy!"
|
One crusty ol' CAG MO used to refer to us as "boy pilots" -- especially after
telling us how we broke "his" planes again...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
VE1E0@NOspam.rac.ca Guest
|
Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 7:56 pm Post subject: Re: Flyboys? |
|
|
"C Knowles" <cknowles (AT) prodigy (DOT) net> wrote:
| Quote: | Nope, but I have had it thrown in my face once or twice. By a ground
pounder.
Curt
|
I can confirm that that's the connotation in the Canadian
Military.
-Gord.
"I'm trying to get as old as I can,
and it must be working 'cause I'm
the oldest now that I've ever been"
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|