AirTalk.org Forum Index AirTalk.org
Aviation discussions newsgroups
 
Archives   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

ET article on flyglobespan
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AirTalk.org Forum Index -> Glasgow Airport
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Iain
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 2:03 pm    Post subject: ET article on flyglobespan Reply with quote



GLASGOW Airport has won daily flights to Paris in a major expansion by
Flyglobespan.
The Scots-based low-cost airline today said it would treble its passenger
numbers next year with eight seven-days-a-week services direct from Glasgow.

Full story -

http://www.eveningtimes.co.uk/hi/news/5031686.html



I'm over the moon at the ORY flight - I've been praying for a lo-cost
alternative to FR for trips to Paris for ages! I'm presuming this flight
will be year-round? The article claims that fares will start at £29.99
rtn! - I think I might be making a few trips to Paris next year! Someone
elsewhere posted that a Paris flight was on the cards - I'll listen to them
more in future.

I think flyglobespan have been quite clever in selecting a Paris airport -
ORY is pretty quick for access to central Paris and also being to the South
of Paris it seperates them a fair bit from FR away to the N. I suppose they
may be able to tap the market to the S of Paris whilst FR tap the N. Does
anyone know what ORY is like - I've only ever been to CDG and tbh I dread
every trip through it!

Interestingly, it says later in he article that the Barcelona flights have
recieved RDF cash from the Scottish Exec. I guess if they already fund FR
from PIK they have to fund globespan as well. No mention of funding for the
ORY flight though - perhaps they can't fund it because FR from PIK and AF
from EDI are not funded and this would therefore be unfair competition. As
discussed previously, the RDF seemed to only fund year-round flights, so are
we to take it this GLA-BCN service is to be year-round?

It will be interesting to see what FR's competative response will be -
there's bound to be one. I'm not really sure what the can do re Paris - they
already have 2xdaily flights, so I can't see them adding frequency, but then
I guess it's not out the question - flood the market with cheap seats Sad I
think there's probably room for both to operate, but Fr might not see it
that way! I could certainly see them going double dailly to Gerona to have a
pop at globespan.

On a negative note, it seems that Rome is dropped from GLA - seemed to be
full, but they must have decided to limit the number of fronts they were
fighting FR on.


Back to top
Joe Curry
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 2:28 pm    Post subject: Re: ET article on flyglobespan Reply with quote



The message <2tn98tF21ja6tU1 (AT) uni-berlin (DOT) de>
from "Iain" <iain1978 (AT) nospamtiscali (DOT) co.uk> contains these words:

Quote:
On a negative note, it seems that Rome is dropped from GLA - seemed to be
full, but they must have decided to limit the number of fronts they were
fighting FR on.

Or the EDI flight was fuller?

--
www.edinburghairport.org.uk Edinburgh Scotland International

Scotland's most convenient/accessible/profitable airport
View my aircraft pictures:
http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?userid=1753

Back to top
Clive Braham
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 5:17 pm    Post subject: Re: ET article on flyglobespan Reply with quote




"Joe Curry" <ability (AT) zetnet (DOT) co.uk> wrote

Quote:
The message <2tn98tF21ja6tU1 (AT) uni-berlin (DOT) de
from "Iain"
On a negative note, it seems that Rome is dropped from GLA - seemed to be
full, but they must have decided to limit the number of fronts they were
fighting FR on.

Or the EDI flight was fuller?

Let me just check the FACTS from another thread....


GLA 2299 EDI 1905 September '04.


Iain is absolutely correct. GSM had to lower fares when MOL jumped in. The
higher cost base remains so revenue would not be so great despite 90-100%
loads.

Perhaps it makes economic sense to move the 2 GLA-FCO flights to EDI where
there is less of a "PIK effect" and revenues can be protected and expand GLA
in other areas. I think Paris daily more than makes up for it. Shame they
dropped EDI-VCE though.



Back to top
BLIMPS
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 5:38 pm    Post subject: Re: ET article on flyglobespan Reply with quote


"Joe Curry" <ability (AT) zetnet (DOT) co.uk> wrote

Quote:
The message <2tn98tF21ja6tU1 (AT) uni-berlin (DOT) de
from "Iain"
On a negative note, it seems that Rome is dropped from GLA - seemed to
be
full, but they must have decided to limit the number of fronts they were
fighting FR on.

Or the EDI flight was fuller?

Fuller than 'full?'

B



Back to top
Iain
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 5:54 pm    Post subject: Re: ET article on flyglobespan Reply with quote


"Clive Braham" <clive (AT) braham5 (DOT) freeserve.co.uk> wrote

Quote:

"Joe Curry" <ability (AT) zetnet (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message
news:2004102015281266937 (AT) zetnet (DOT) co.uk...
The message <2tn98tF21ja6tU1 (AT) uni-berlin (DOT) de
from "Iain"
On a negative note, it seems that Rome is dropped from GLA - seemed to
be
full, but they must have decided to limit the number of fronts they
were
fighting FR on.

Or the EDI flight was fuller?

Let me just check the FACTS from another thread....

GLA 2299 EDI 1905 September '04.

Yes Clive, I normally make a point of trying to ignore a certain person, but
I went and looked at the figures for the season on the GLA and EDI-Rome
routes. Here they are:

GLA-FCO
April 2210
May 1775
June 1582
July 2384
August 2273
September 2299
Total 12523

EDI-FCO
April 435
May 285
June 1175
July 1582
August 1328
September 1905
Total 6710

Even if we leave out April and May (I don't think the EDI flights were
operating then - although it does have a 1-stop BA via BHX which further
increases the figures), we still see that GLA had far more pax. As usual, a
certain person couldn't be more wrong.

I must say in light of these figures their decision re. allocation of Rome
flights for next summer looks a bit funny, but as you say maybe it's a
revenue issue with FR down the road at PIK.

Quote:
Shame they dropped EDI-VCE though.


Yes, I thought they might expand VCE from both airports - it must be a
popular enough destination - maybe FR are planning flights to there.

Overall, they seem to have focussed primarily on consolidating destinations
already served by increasing frequency. I thought they might have expanded
destination wise into E. Europe to upcoming places like BUD and KRK, and
maybe even Berlin, but I suppose their strategy of consolodation is probably
the right one.



Back to top
Joe Curry
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 5:55 pm    Post subject: Re: ET article on flyglobespan Reply with quote

The message <cl66ji$ek2$1 (AT) news6 (DOT) svr.pol.co.uk>
from "Clive Braham" <clive (AT) braham5 (DOT) freeserve.co.uk> contains these words:



Quote:
Let me just check the FACTS from another thread....

GLA 2299 EDI 1905 September '04.

Same number of flights,?

Quote:
Shame they
dropped EDI-VCE though.

Some routes work others don't. :-(

--
www.edinburghairport.org.uk Edinburgh Scotland International

Scotland's most convenient/accessible/profitable airport
View my aircraft pictures:
http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?userid=1753

Back to top
John Dundas
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 6:23 pm    Post subject: Re: ET article on flyglobespan Reply with quote


"Joe Curry" <ability (AT) zetnet (DOT) co.uk> wrote

Quote:
The message <2tn98tF21ja6tU1 (AT) uni-berlin (DOT) de
from "Iain"
On a negative note, it seems that Rome is dropped from GLA - seemed to
be
full, but they must have decided to limit the number of fronts they were
fighting FR on.

Or the EDI flight was fuller?


Oh you little bitter and twisted little man...........


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system ([url]http://www.grisoft.com)[/url].
Version: 6.0.778 / Virus Database: 525 - Release Date: 15/10/2004



Back to top
Clive Braham
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 8:53 pm    Post subject: Re: ET article on flyglobespan Reply with quote


"Joe Curry" <ability (AT) zetnet (DOT) co.uk> wrote

Quote:
The message <cl66ji$ek2$1 (AT) news6 (DOT) svr.pol.co.uk
from "Clive Braham"


don't blame you for snipping your bit.... You should have paused for a
moment to think.


Quote:

Let me just check the FACTS from another thread....

GLA 2299 EDI 1905 September '04.

Same number of flights,?

Yup.

Quote:

Shame they
dropped EDI-VCE though.

Some routes work others don't. :-(


Yup.



Back to top
BLIMPS
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 10:01 pm    Post subject: Re: ET article on flyglobespan Reply with quote


"Clive Braham" <clive (AT) braham5 (DOT) freeserve.co.uk> wrote

Quote:

"Joe Curry" <ability (AT) zetnet (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message
news:2004102018554566937 (AT) zetnet (DOT) co.uk...
The message <cl66ji$ek2$1 (AT) news6 (DOT) svr.pol.co.uk
from "Clive Braham" words:



don't blame you for snipping your bit.... You should have paused for a
moment to think.



Let me just check the FACTS from another thread....

GLA 2299 EDI 1905 September '04.

Same number of flights,?

Yup.


Shame they
dropped EDI-VCE though.

Some routes work others don't. :-(


Yup.

Joe Curry's credibility = 0

B



Back to top
Tyler Durden
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 12:11 pm    Post subject: Re: ET article on flyglobespan Reply with quote


"BLIMPS" <BLIMPS (AT) btopenworld (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:

"Clive Braham" <clive (AT) braham5 (DOT) freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:cl6j9b$6ih$1 (AT) news5 (DOT) svr.pol.co.uk...

"Joe Curry" <ability (AT) zetnet (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message
news:2004102018554566937 (AT) zetnet (DOT) co.uk...
The message <cl66ji$ek2$1 (AT) news6 (DOT) svr.pol.co.uk
from "Clive Braham" words:



don't blame you for snipping your bit.... You should have paused for a
moment to think.



Let me just check the FACTS from another thread....

GLA 2299 EDI 1905 September '04.

Same number of flights,?

Yup.


Shame they
dropped EDI-VCE though.

Some routes work others don't. :-(


Yup.

Joe Curry's credibility = 0

B

Which is substantially more than yours



Back to top
Jon Simpson
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 12:29 pm    Post subject: Re: ET article on flyglobespan Reply with quote


"Tyler Durden" <nospam (AT) news (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:

"BLIMPS" <BLIMPS (AT) btopenworld (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:cl6n6v$364$1 (AT) sparta (DOT) btinternet.com...

"Clive Braham" <clive (AT) braham5 (DOT) freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:cl6j9b$6ih$1 (AT) news5 (DOT) svr.pol.co.uk...

"Joe Curry" <ability (AT) zetnet (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message
news:2004102018554566937 (AT) zetnet (DOT) co.uk...
The message <cl66ji$ek2$1 (AT) news6 (DOT) svr.pol.co.uk
from "Clive Braham" words:



don't blame you for snipping your bit.... You should have paused for a
moment to think.



Let me just check the FACTS from another thread....

GLA 2299 EDI 1905 September '04.

Same number of flights,?

Yup.


Shame they
dropped EDI-VCE though.

Some routes work others don't. :-(


Yup.

Joe Curry's credibility = 0

B

Which is substantially more than yours

Do you ever wonder why god gave you two ears and one mouth Wu:lle?


JRS



Back to top
Joe Curry
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 1:22 pm    Post subject: Re: ET article on flyglobespan Reply with quote

The message <6INdd.128270$BI5.110493 (AT) fe2 (DOT) news.blueyonder.co.uk>
from "Tyler Durden" <nospam (AT) news (DOT) com> contains these words:

Quote:
Joe Curry's credibility = 0

Which is substantially more than yours

Usenet post of the week! Smile)

--
www.edinburghairport.org.uk Edinburgh Scotland International

Scotland's most convenient/accessible/profitable airport
View my aircraft pictures:
http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?userid=1753

Back to top
GLAGAZ
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 7:19 pm    Post subject: Re: ET article on flyglobespan Reply with quote

Joe Curry <ability (AT) zetnet (DOT) co.uk> wrote

Quote:
The message <6INdd.128270$BI5.110493 (AT) fe2 (DOT) news.blueyonder.co.uk
from "Tyler Durden"
Joe Curry's credibility = 0

Which is substantially more than yours

Usenet post of the week! Smile

Back-patting?

Back to top
John Reid
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Oct 23, 2004 12:04 pm    Post subject: Re: ET article on flyglobespan Reply with quote

Joe Curry wrote :
Quote:
The message <2tn98tF21ja6tU1 (AT) uni-berlin (DOT) de
from "Iain"
On a negative note, it seems that Rome is dropped from GLA - seemed to be
full, but they must have decided to limit the number of fronts they were
fighting FR on.

Or the EDI flight was fuller?


Note : according to your own view of life (and the fact that people
would expect you to abide by your own absurd "guidelines" even though we
all know they do not apply) that this is both OT and trolling here.

--
John
Mail sent to the reply address will be binned automatically.
Use my name with the domain (@+the rest)

Back to top
John Reid
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Oct 23, 2004 12:06 pm    Post subject: Re: ET article on flyglobespan Reply with quote

BLIMPS wrote :
Quote:

"Clive Braham" <clive (AT) braham5 (DOT) freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:cl6j9b$6ih$1 (AT) news5 (DOT) svr.pol.co.uk...

"Joe Curry" <ability (AT) zetnet (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message
news:2004102018554566937 (AT) zetnet (DOT) co.uk...
The message <cl66ji$ek2$1 (AT) news6 (DOT) svr.pol.co.uk
from "Clive Braham" words:



don't blame you for snipping your bit.... You should have paused for a
moment to think.



Let me just check the FACTS from another thread....

GLA 2299 EDI 1905 September '04.

Same number of flights,?

Yup.


Shame they
dropped EDI-VCE though.

Some routes work others don't. :-(


Yup.

Joe Curry's credibility = 0

B



Forgive the correction Mr Blimps, but I think Joe Curry's credibility =
-1


--
John
Mail sent to the reply address will be binned automatically.
Use my name with the domain (@+the rest)

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AirTalk.org Forum Index -> Glasgow Airport All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2006 phpBB Group
SEO toolkit © 2004-2006 webmedic.