 |
AirTalk.org Aviation discussions newsgroups
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
BoDEAN Guest
|
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2003 9:14 pm Post subject: Emergency Descents |
|
|
How have you been taught / perform emergency descents? I've heard
different techniques and curious what others were taught
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bdm Guest
|
Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2003 3:33 am Post subject: Re: Emergency Descents |
|
|
It very much depends on the situation.
The FAA seems to like turn 90 off airway, get down fast to breathable
altitudes.
But this assumes that the need is to get down quickly to breathable
altitudes. That is not necessarily the case.
If the purpose is to get down quickly, pick the configuration that produces
the highest rate of descent. Most times this means flaps up, low power,
high airspeed. Speed brakes/spoilers if you have them.
In article <dd21ov4moq3qqe61984hgeakao2qcloaks (AT) 4ax (DOT) com>, BoDEAN
<jbo (AT) not_a_valid_email_addy (DOT) com> wrote:
| Quote: | How have you been taught / perform emergency descents? I've heard
different techniques and curious what others were taught
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Scott Lowrey Guest
|
Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2003 3:36 am Post subject: Re: Emergency Descents |
|
|
"BoDEAN" <jbo (AT) not_a_valid_email_addy (DOT) com> wrote
| Quote: | How have you been taught / perform emergency descents? I've heard
different techniques and curious what others were taught
|
That's a good question. I asked an instructor about it early on in my
training and he said that they don't cover this topic for the private. It's
described in the Jeppesen private pilot maneuvers manual that I have and it
certainly seems to be something worth learning.
My instructor did demonstrate a rapid spiraling descent as an emergency
landing technique but he told me it was more of a commercial maneuver; his
intent was to demonstrate a setup for an emergency landing to a field
directly below.
-Scott
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
C J Campbell Guest
|
Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2003 5:08 am Post subject: Re: Emergency Descents |
|
|
I usually descend with full flaps at maximum flap extended speed, adding
bank to increase rate of descent if necessary. If simulating a fire in one
wing I do not use flaps but instead slip away from the fire.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
James M. Knox Guest
|
Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2003 2:04 pm Post subject: Re: Emergency Descents |
|
|
"Scott Lowrey" <scott (AT) no (DOT) spam.net> wrote in
news:gr5gb.225820$mp.141151 (AT) rwcrnsc51 (DOT) ops.asp.att.net:
| Quote: | My instructor did demonstrate a rapid spiraling descent as an
emergency landing technique but he told me it was more of a commercial
maneuver; his intent was to demonstrate a setup for an emergency
landing to a field directly below.
|
Many high performance aircraft will have a technique specified in the POH.
It may or may not be a "steep spiral," depending upon the aircraft.
The steep spiral maneuver which is part of the commercial and CFI flight
maneuvers is certainly one that works with most aircraft. Essentially it
involves the private pilot "turns around a point" maneuver, with the plane
in a steep bank (up to 55 degrees), with the power at idle. The airspeed
is held to a reasonable number (some like to see "best glide" although that
has little meaning during the maneuvers) and you can get reasonably high
rates of descent while keeping positive G's on the airframe.
-----------------------------------------------
James M. Knox
TriSoft ph 512-385-0316
1109-A Shady Lane fax 512-366-4331
Austin, Tx 78721 [email]jknox (AT) trisoft (DOT) com[/email]
-----------------------------------------------
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
David Megginson Guest
|
Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2003 2:19 pm Post subject: Re: Emergency Descents |
|
|
[email]smit5h (AT) nortstar (DOT) com[/email] (bdm) writes:
| Quote: | If the purpose is to get down quickly, pick the configuration that produces
the highest rate of descent. Most times this means flaps up, low power,
high airspeed. Speed brakes/spoilers if you have them.
|
How about an idle-power spiral descent in a 45-degree bank at Vno
(edge of the yellow arc)? That should bring you down under control
extremely fast. No flaps down for most planes, obviously, at that
speed. I might be a bit nervous trying that in a retractable since
things can go out of control so fast, but it shouldn't be a problem in
a simple fixed-gear plane like a 172/182, Cherokee, or Musketeer.
All the best,
David
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guy Middleton Guest
|
Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2003 5:36 pm Post subject: Re: Emergency Descents |
|
|
I remember being told once that for gliders, the best way to get down really
quickly is to spin. I would not try it in a non-acrobatic power aircraft,
however.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Roger Long Guest
|
Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2003 7:07 pm Post subject: Re: Emergency Descents |
|
|
Keep in mind that getting down fast(est) is one thing. The probability is
high that a need for a fast descent will probably be accompanied by the need
to deal with something else like a fire, a passenger having a heart attack,
or even just finding a landing place. Some methods will get you down fast
but can get you in trouble if you aren't right on top of airspeed. It may
be worth trading some descent rate for a configuration in which the plane is
more speed and attitude stable.
I was taught, idle power, full flaps, hold airspeed at 85 knots. My ears
hurt so it was pretty fast.
A high time instructor showed me a method losing altitude quickly on a high,
tight, 180 turn from downwind to final. Put in lots of outside rudder in
the turn. I've pushed the pedal all the way to the metal in my 172 and the
airspeed drop and descent rate are jaw dropping. If you just kept going
around in a circle at about 30 degree bank, you would get down pretty fast.
The ball parks all the way at the side of the tube but the plane feels very
solid. You have to keep pushing the nose down to keep the airspeed up.
You must not let the airspeed get critically low however and then relax the
rudder pressure too suddenly (especially in a 150 or 152) so this probably
wouldn't be the way to do it if you were using a fire extinguisher at the
same time. If you keep the airspeed up, and aren't over hasty with the
rudder however, the transition back to normal descent is very smooth and
quick.
Don't try it the first time without plenty of altitude and or a CFI. May
not be healthy in less stable planes than the 172.
--
Roger Long
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jim Fisher Guest
|
Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2003 7:49 pm Post subject: Re: Emergency Descents |
|
|
"BoDEAN" <jbo (AT) not_a_valid_email_addy (DOT) com> wrote
| Quote: | How have you been taught / perform emergency descents? I've heard
different techniques and curious what others were taught
|
Full flaps, power idle, 45 degree bank and watch the VSI zoom to 2000fpm. I
can't reckon that a safe descent gets much faster than that.
Great fun doing this. It's the closest I've come to aerobatics in a
non-aerobatic plane!
--
Jim Fisher
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bob Gardner Guest
|
Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2003 10:09 pm Post subject: Re: Emergency Descents |
|
|
There is no undue stress on the airframe in spin recovery if done properly,
with or without an engine up front. It is a one-G maneuver.
Bob Gardner
"Guy Middleton" <guy (AT) obstruction (DOT) com> wrote
| Quote: | I remember being told once that for gliders, the best way to get down
really
quickly is to spin. I would not try it in a non-acrobatic power aircraft,
however.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hilton Guest
|
Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2003 10:42 pm Post subject: Re: Emergency Descents |
|
|
Jim Fisher wrote:
| Quote: | BoDEAN wrote:
How have you been taught / perform emergency descents? I've heard
different techniques and curious what others were taught
Full flaps, power idle, 45 degree bank and watch the VSI zoom to 2000fpm.
I
can't reckon that a safe descent gets much faster than that.
|
Jim,
If you were flying at 12,000' and your engine caught fire, would you be
satisfied to sit in a burning plane for over 6 minutes? A spin at 6000 fpm
would be a much better plan at that point. I'm guessing you got this
technique from your CFI - I got the same one from mine. It's wrong, it's
bad, and it might kill you. You owe it to yourself to experiment. If I
were in a 172, I'd pull the power back to idle and point the nose down until
I got to Vne and hold it there till it was time to start flaring. Throw in
a slip and you'll be doing even better. [Can a 172 exceed Vne? ]
Now, when you go train for this, stay (well) below Vne and make sure that
the air is smooth etc. However, I'm sure this will be an eye-opener and
you'll dump your flaps down maneuver in no time.
No doubt, there will be those who say "But you'll be faster when you need to
flare." Well, from 12,000 at 2000fpm takes 6 minutes versus 2 minutes at
6000 fpm. It sure won't take you 4 minutes to flare! Even from a more
'normal' altitude of 6000', the difference would be 2 minutes - that's a
LONG time with flames next to your ears.
Jim, go up and try it, report back. I'm sure you'll get the same results as
I did.
Hilton
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Robert M. Gary Guest
|
Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2003 11:16 pm Post subject: Re: Emergency Descents |
|
|
[email]smit5h (AT) nortstar (DOT) com[/email] (bdm) wrote in message news:<uo5gb.4452$gA1.2673 (AT) newsread3 (DOT) news.pas.earthlink.net>...
| Quote: | It very much depends on the situation.
The FAA seems to like turn 90 off airway, get down fast to breathable
altitudes.
But this assumes that the need is to get down quickly to breathable
altitudes. That is not necessarily the case.
If the purpose is to get down quickly, pick the configuration that produces
the highest rate of descent. Most times this means flaps up, low power,
high airspeed. Speed brakes/spoilers if you have them.
|
Its covered in the commerical and CFI. Its probably not covered in the
private because the bank angle is so great. It works best with full
opp rudder in. You can easily peg the VSI on a 172. If you want to
glide down nice and slow, keep it coordinated, if you want to get down
fast, smash in full slip rudder.
-Robert, CFI
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bdm Guest
|
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2003 12:34 am Post subject: Re: Emergency Descents |
|
|
Try it. Power idle, straight ahead, flaps up. Below redline. The VSI
might read 2000 fpm. More likely a lot, lot more.
Don't do this in a turn. Straight ahead. Take the forward pressure off
gently. It really isn't any more risky than a 45 degree turn in a steep
descent, since over rolling during a pull can put a lot of loads on.
Aileron loads and flap loads can get real high if you screw up on the
roll part and the speed goes up.
In article <ZFjgb.24149$wC1.20632 (AT) bignews3 (DOT) bellsouth.net>, "Jim Fisher"
<newsaddyREMOVE (AT) MEhiwaay (DOT) net> wrote:
| Quote: | "BoDEAN" <jbo (AT) not_a_valid_email_addy (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:dd21ov4moq3qqe61984hgeakao2qcloaks (AT) 4ax (DOT) com...
How have you been taught / perform emergency descents? I've heard
different techniques and curious what others were taught
Full flaps, power idle, 45 degree bank and watch the VSI zoom to 2000fpm. I
can't reckon that a safe descent gets much faster than that.
Great fun doing this. It's the closest I've come to aerobatics in a
non-aerobatic plane!
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Roger Halstead Guest
|
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2003 1:54 am Post subject: Re: Emergency Descents |
|
|
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003 22:08:50 -0700, "C J Campbell"
<christophercampbellNOSPAM (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote:
| Quote: | I usually descend with full flaps at maximum flap extended speed, adding
bank to increase rate of descent if necessary. If simulating a fire in one
wing I do not use flaps but instead slip away from the fire.
|
In the Bonanza and Debonair it's gear down, flaps up, power idle,
speed at maximum gear down, in a steep spiral (I add slip and do steep
turns at 60 degrees) which in mine gives over 2200 fpm rate of
descent.
Most Bonanzas come down a lot slower than they go up, basically due to
speed limitations. With gear up you would be hard pressed to maintain
1000 fpm without exceeding Vne. Particularly if they have a 2-blade
prop.(hard to slow up), but with gear down and a 3-blade prop, they
have a descent profile like an overloaded Cherokee.
Roger Halstead (K8RI EN73 & ARRL Life Member)
www.rogerhalstead.com
N833R World's oldest Debonair? (S# CD-2)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Roger Halstead Guest
|
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2003 3:44 am Post subject: Re: Emergency Descents |
|
|
On 6 Oct 2003 16:16:02 -0700, [email]rmg1 (AT) my-deja (DOT) com[/email] (Robert M. Gary) wrote:
| Quote: | smit5h (AT) nortstar (DOT) com (bdm) wrote in message news:<uo5gb.4452$gA1.2673 (AT) newsread3 (DOT) news.pas.earthlink.net>...
It very much depends on the situation.
The FAA seems to like turn 90 off airway, get down fast to breathable
altitudes.
But this assumes that the need is to get down quickly to breathable
altitudes. That is not necessarily the case.
If the purpose is to get down quickly, pick the configuration that produces
the highest rate of descent. Most times this means flaps up, low power,
high airspeed. Speed brakes/spoilers if you have them.
Its covered in the commerical and CFI. Its probably not covered in the
private because the bank angle is so great. It works best with full
|
There is nothing excessive about angles up to 60 degrees. When I took
the PPL practical test ride I had to do my steep turns at 60. < )
Also, I've been given emergency descents on every biennial flight
review. That's in addition to the simulated engine failure.
I think the FAA did the students and pilots alike a disservice by
dropping the bank angle on steep turns from 60 to 45 degrees.
| Quote: | opp rudder in. You can easily peg the VSI on a 172. If you want to
glide down nice and slow, keep it coordinated, if you want to get down
fast, smash in full slip rudder.
|
Just like the express elevator.
Roger Halstead (K8RI EN73 & ARRL Life Member)
www.rogerhalstead.com
N833R World's oldest Debonair? (S# CD-2)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|