| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
googlebart2000@yahoo.com Guest
|
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 11:19 pm Post subject: Electronic versus Pneumatic compensation in LX7000 |
|
|
My new LX7000 has instructions for setting up with electronic or
pneumatic compensation, but does not make a recommendation. My new
glider seems to have a very nice TE installation, so my bet is on the
pneumatic route, but if anyone has direct experience with this
instrument (or on the topic in general) I would appreciate any
feedback.
Oh, and same question on my Cambridge 302 ... I used electronic TE
compensation with it in my 304CZ, but I'm not sure that was the best
way to go. And if I connect both instruments to the same TE probe, how
much should they be separated in tube length?
-ted/2NO
(it's going in a Ventus 2c)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Udo Rumpf Guest
|
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 11:58 pm Post subject: Re: Electronic versus Pneumatic compensation in LX7000 |
|
|
Mike Borgelt recommends the Y junction to be installed well behind the pilot
seat.
I flew over 10 years ago with an LX 4000 and electronically compensated it
worked flawlessly.
Udo
....
| Quote: | My new LX7000 has instructions for setting up with electronic or
pneumatic compensation, but does not make a recommendation. My new
glider seems to have a very nice TE installation, so my bet is on the
pneumatic route, but if anyone has direct experience with this
instrument (or on the topic in general) I would appreciate any
feedback.
Oh, and same question on my Cambridge 302 ... I used electronic TE
compensation with it in my 304CZ, but I'm not sure that was the best
way to go. And if I connect both instruments to the same TE probe, how
much should they be separated in tube length?
-ted/2NO
(it's going in a Ventus 2c)
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Eric Greenwell Guest
|
Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 12:53 am Post subject: Re: Electronic versus Pneumatic compensation in LX7000 |
|
|
[email]googlebart2000 (AT) yahoo (DOT) com[/email] wrote:
| Quote: | My new LX7000 has instructions for setting up with electronic or
pneumatic compensation, but does not make a recommendation. My new
glider seems to have a very nice TE installation, so my bet is on the
pneumatic route, but if anyone has direct experience with this
instrument (or on the topic in general) I would appreciate any
feedback.
Oh, and same question on my Cambridge 302 ... I used electronic TE
compensation with it in my 304CZ, but I'm not sure that was the best
way to go. And if I connect both instruments to the same TE probe, how
much should they be separated in tube length?
|
Since neither uses a flask, you should be able to connect them together.
Without a flask to introduce airflow, they will not introduce pressure
errors, and pressure is what they sense. I'd put the tee close to the
instruments.
--
Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly
Eric Greenwell
Washington State
USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kirk.stant@gmail.com Guest
|
Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 9:33 pm Post subject: Re: Electronic versus Pneumatic compensation in LX7000 |
|
|
Ted, since you have the luxury of the option, why not try both and
compare? I would suggest hooking up your primary vario to the TE
probe, and setup the other to use electronic TE. After a few flights
you can decide to keep it that way which will let you still enjoy a TE
vario if your probe falls off inflight (or the tubing gets pinched,
etc..). If they don't match, you can go with the better of the two
methods.
BTW, I use electronic TE on a Westerboer VW911 for several years and
really liked it - no problems with yaw or gust sensitivity (on an LS4).
Kirk
66
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dgseguin@rocler.qc.ca Guest
|
Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2005 12:02 am Post subject: Re: Electronic versus Pneumatic compensation in LX7000 |
|
|
I use electonic TE with LX 5000 and LS 6.Perfect
S6
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dgseguin@rocler.qc.ca Guest
|
Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2005 12:09 am Post subject: Re: Electronic versus Pneumatic compensation in LX7000 |
|
|
I use LX 5000 Elec. TE on my LS6. Perfect
S6
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Walter Kronester Guest
|
Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2005 9:29 pm Post subject: Re: Electronic versus Pneumatic compensation in LX7000 |
|
|
Hi Ted,
I like Kirks idea:
Please try both instruments in TE and electronic mode and tell us about your
findigs.
This will create an interesting post for many of us.
Thanks in advance
Walter
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
2cernauta2 Guest
|
Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2005 11:12 pm Post subject: Re: Electronic versus Pneumatic compensation in LX7000 |
|
|
[email]dgseguin (AT) rocler (DOT) qc.ca[/email] wrote:
| Quote: | I use electonic TE with LX 5000 and LS 6.Perfect
S6
|
Would you please tell me the settings you have selected in the TE
setup page?
thanks!
Aldo
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dgseguin@rocler.qc.ca Guest
|
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2005 1:49 am Post subject: Re: Electronic versus Pneumatic compensation in LX7000 |
|
|
I use 7 if I remember well. Will check next week end. Also I have
manifolded front and rear static.
S6
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|