AirTalk.org Forum Index AirTalk.org
Aviation discussions newsgroups
 
Archives   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Electronic versus Pneumatic compensation in LX7000

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AirTalk.org Forum Index -> Sailplanes
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
googlebart2000@yahoo.com
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 11:19 pm    Post subject: Electronic versus Pneumatic compensation in LX7000 Reply with quote



My new LX7000 has instructions for setting up with electronic or
pneumatic compensation, but does not make a recommendation. My new
glider seems to have a very nice TE installation, so my bet is on the
pneumatic route, but if anyone has direct experience with this
instrument (or on the topic in general) I would appreciate any
feedback.

Oh, and same question on my Cambridge 302 ... I used electronic TE
compensation with it in my 304CZ, but I'm not sure that was the best
way to go. And if I connect both instruments to the same TE probe, how
much should they be separated in tube length?

-ted/2NO

(it's going in a Ventus 2c)

Back to top
Udo Rumpf
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 11:58 pm    Post subject: Re: Electronic versus Pneumatic compensation in LX7000 Reply with quote



Mike Borgelt recommends the Y junction to be installed well behind the pilot
seat.
I flew over 10 years ago with an LX 4000 and electronically compensated it
worked flawlessly.
Udo
....
Quote:
My new LX7000 has instructions for setting up with electronic or
pneumatic compensation, but does not make a recommendation. My new
glider seems to have a very nice TE installation, so my bet is on the
pneumatic route, but if anyone has direct experience with this
instrument (or on the topic in general) I would appreciate any
feedback.

Oh, and same question on my Cambridge 302 ... I used electronic TE
compensation with it in my 304CZ, but I'm not sure that was the best
way to go. And if I connect both instruments to the same TE probe, how
much should they be separated in tube length?

-ted/2NO

(it's going in a Ventus 2c)



Back to top
Eric Greenwell
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 12:53 am    Post subject: Re: Electronic versus Pneumatic compensation in LX7000 Reply with quote



[email]googlebart2000 (AT) yahoo (DOT) com[/email] wrote:

Quote:
My new LX7000 has instructions for setting up with electronic or
pneumatic compensation, but does not make a recommendation. My new
glider seems to have a very nice TE installation, so my bet is on the
pneumatic route, but if anyone has direct experience with this
instrument (or on the topic in general) I would appreciate any
feedback.

Oh, and same question on my Cambridge 302 ... I used electronic TE
compensation with it in my 304CZ, but I'm not sure that was the best
way to go. And if I connect both instruments to the same TE probe, how
much should they be separated in tube length?

Since neither uses a flask, you should be able to connect them together.
Without a flask to introduce airflow, they will not introduce pressure
errors, and pressure is what they sense. I'd put the tee close to the
instruments.


--
Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly

Eric Greenwell
Washington State
USA

Back to top
kirk.stant@gmail.com
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 9:33 pm    Post subject: Re: Electronic versus Pneumatic compensation in LX7000 Reply with quote

Ted, since you have the luxury of the option, why not try both and
compare? I would suggest hooking up your primary vario to the TE
probe, and setup the other to use electronic TE. After a few flights
you can decide to keep it that way which will let you still enjoy a TE
vario if your probe falls off inflight (or the tubing gets pinched,
etc..). If they don't match, you can go with the better of the two
methods.

BTW, I use electronic TE on a Westerboer VW911 for several years and
really liked it - no problems with yaw or gust sensitivity (on an LS4).

Kirk
66

Back to top
dgseguin@rocler.qc.ca
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2005 12:02 am    Post subject: Re: Electronic versus Pneumatic compensation in LX7000 Reply with quote

I use electonic TE with LX 5000 and LS 6.Perfect
S6

Back to top
dgseguin@rocler.qc.ca
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2005 12:09 am    Post subject: Re: Electronic versus Pneumatic compensation in LX7000 Reply with quote

I use LX 5000 Elec. TE on my LS6. Perfect
S6

Back to top
Walter Kronester
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2005 9:29 pm    Post subject: Re: Electronic versus Pneumatic compensation in LX7000 Reply with quote

Hi Ted,
I like Kirks idea:
Please try both instruments in TE and electronic mode and tell us about your
findigs.
This will create an interesting post for many of us.
Thanks in advance
Walter


Back to top
2cernauta2
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2005 11:12 pm    Post subject: Re: Electronic versus Pneumatic compensation in LX7000 Reply with quote

[email]dgseguin (AT) rocler (DOT) qc.ca[/email] wrote:

Quote:
I use electonic TE with LX 5000 and LS 6.Perfect
S6

Would you please tell me the settings you have selected in the TE
setup page?

thanks!

Aldo


Back to top
dgseguin@rocler.qc.ca
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Sep 15, 2005 1:49 am    Post subject: Re: Electronic versus Pneumatic compensation in LX7000 Reply with quote

I use 7 if I remember well. Will check next week end. Also I have
manifolded front and rear static.
S6

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AirTalk.org Forum Index -> Sailplanes All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2006 phpBB Group
SEO toolkit © 2004-2006 webmedic.