AirTalk.org Forum Index AirTalk.org
Aviation discussions newsgroups
 
Archives   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Elastic Rotor Bearings from Resilin?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AirTalk.org Forum Index -> Hot air, gas balloons and airships
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
server
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 8:34 am    Post subject: Elastic Rotor Bearings from Resilin? Reply with quote



[ message unavailable ]
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 8:34 am    Post subject: Re: Elastic Rotor Bearings from Resilin? Reply with quote



These articles quote resilience of 97% compared to 80% for synthetic
rubber:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resilin

http://www.future.org.au/news_2005/august/insect.html

Other articles mention resilin being used in insect exo-skeletal shells
or beetle wings, possibly allowing such structures to store energy:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10983820&dopt=Abstract

http://www.livescience.com/technology/051012_insect_rubber.html

I couldn't find anything about the UV resistance properties, although
perhaps some additive or modifier could be used to give UV resistance.
Couldn't find anything on tensile strength, either. Does anyone else
know?

With such a high mechanical efficiency, I'd wonder if one couldn't
perhaps even make flapping wing joints out of it. But what do you all
say -- what might be the best way to make use of this material for
mechanical airborn propulsion purposes?
Back to top
Orval Fairbairn
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 9:03 pm    Post subject: Re: Elastic Rotor Bearings from Resilin? Reply with quote



In article <1129523661.475384.190950 (AT) f14g2000cwb (DOT) googlegroups.com>,
manofsan (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote:

Quote:
These articles quote resilience of 97% compared to 80% for synthetic
rubber:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resilin

http://www.future.org.au/news_2005/august/insect.html

Other articles mention resilin being used in insect exo-skeletal shells
or beetle wings, possibly allowing such structures to store energy:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids
=10983820&dopt=Abstract

http://www.livescience.com/technology/051012_insect_rubber.html

I couldn't find anything about the UV resistance properties, although
perhaps some additive or modifier could be used to give UV resistance.
Couldn't find anything on tensile strength, either. Does anyone else
know?

With such a high mechanical efficiency, I'd wonder if one couldn't
perhaps even make flapping wing joints out of it. But what do you all
say -- what might be the best way to make use of this material for
mechanical airborn propulsion purposes?

As I posted earlier, it sounds interesting, but I am not going to build
something that depends on it until I can evaluate its mechanical
properties and how they stand up to the effects of aging, UV, heat,
cold, the usual solvents, fuels and lubricants found in aviation.

Until we have that information, resilin will be a potential, but
unproven, material. I would suggest that it be tried on model airplanes,
etc., to get a feel for its real-world properties.
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2005 1:18 pm    Post subject: Re: Maximum Theoretical Balloon Size? Reply with quote

hello der!. try to visit this,
http://www.tpub.com/aviation1.htm
it might provide answer. the link was posted on the other group, im
already visited it, so im sure it wasnt a virus or whatever that can
harm ur comp.




manofsan (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote:
Quote:
What is the maximum theoretical size possible for a lighter-than-air
balloon, using ideal materials, before it loses its integrity?

Here's an article from a month ago, about sheets being made from the
famous nanotubes:


http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2005-08/uota-utd081505.php

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanotube

quote from Wikipedia:

"Ray Baughman's group from the NanoTech Institute at University of
Texas at Dallas produced the current toughest material known in
mid-2003 by spinning fibers of single wall carbon nanotubes with
polyvinyl alcohol. Beating the previous contender, spider silk, by a
factor of four, the fibers require 600J/g to break. In comparison, the
bullet-resistant fiber Kevlar is 27-33J/g. In mid-2005 Baughman and
co-workers from Australia's Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial
Research Organization developed a method for producing transparent
carbon nanotube sheets 1/1000th the thickness of a human hair capable
of supporting 50,000 times their own mass.

In August 2005, Ray Baughman's team managed to develop a fast method to
manufacture up to seven meters per minute of nanotube tape. Once washed
with ethanol, the ribbon is only 50 nanometers thick; a square
kilometer of the material would only weigh 30 kilograms."


-------

So if the limiting factor is tensile strength, and nanotube fibres are
the record-holder at 600J/g tensile strength (20x stronger than
kevlar??) while also having a mass of 30 kg per sq km, then how big can
one make a balloon held together by the nanotubes? And what kind of
displacement lift force would it exert?
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AirTalk.org Forum Index -> Hot air, gas balloons and airships All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2006 phpBB Group
SEO toolkit © 2004-2006 webmedic.