 |
AirTalk.org Aviation discussions newsgroups
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
jacekkobiesa@raypolandand Guest
|
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2005 6:04 pm Post subject: EFIS |
|
|
To All,
I read the postings about the downed glider near Reno, NV. I would like
to point out that there are some other viable options for gyros, EFIS,
etc. that should and can make flying in some unique conditions a bit
safer and give the pilot some extra info. Please check this link
http://www.pcflightsystems.com/ . In addition, there is a lot of
different manufacturers with solid state "gyros" available to be
displayed on iPAQ. Also, please check the Craggy Aero web site for
solid state gyros available for sale right now.
Sincerely,
jk
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
googlebart2000@yahoo.com Guest
|
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2005 8:31 pm Post subject: Re: EFIS |
|
|
There is a similar solid-state product available at Wings and Wheels.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BTIZ Guest
|
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2005 12:48 am Post subject: Re: EFIS |
|
|
as I understand it, he had an electric turn and bank..
it was slow to spin up or had other problems when he needed it
B
<jacekkobiesa (AT) raypolandandsons (DOT) us> wrote
| Quote: | To All,
I read the postings about the downed glider near Reno, NV. I would like
to point out that there are some other viable options for gyros, EFIS,
etc. that should and can make flying in some unique conditions a bit
safer and give the pilot some extra info. Please check this link
http://www.pcflightsystems.com/ . In addition, there is a lot of
different manufacturers with solid state "gyros" available to be
displayed on iPAQ. Also, please check the Craggy Aero web site for
solid state gyros available for sale right now.
Sincerely,
jk
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
faadpe Guest
|
Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 8:15 am Post subject: Re: EFIS |
|
|
ALCON....
I have a Dynon EFIS in my Nimbus 3, 26m. I have been cloud flying for
almost 10+ yrs in Florida...all legal, there are a lot of
misconceptions of this...but according to the current FAR, in the USA
cloud flying is legal.
With the EFIS, I have a Tru-Trak T&B, however, the preferred T&B is
always a 6 degree per sec turn versus a 3 degree per sec turn...due to
the slower speeds that sailplanes maneuver during thermalling.
Check out the Dynon site, they are very reasonable, simple to install
and small amperes draw as well:
http://www.dynonavionics.com
The ASH more in likely exceeded his Vne based on air density &
temperature, encounter flutter...then you know the rest of the
story...
Shawn
--
faadpe
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted via OziPilots Online [ http://www.OziPilotsOnline.com.au ]
- A website for Australian Pilots regardless of when, why, or what they fly -
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jguimondjr@erols.com Guest
|
Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 3:59 pm Post subject: Re: EFIS |
|
|
Please remember the accident statistics for instrument rated power
pilots who lose their vacuum system--not a pretty picture. In order to
obtain the instrument rating you must demonstrate the ability to fly
without an attitude indicator (read using either turn and bank or turn
coordinator). History has shown that a high percentage of these cases
result in a fatal crash.
Please do not think that a solid state gyro, or any other instrument,
will eliminate the problem. It takes a lot of training and continuing
proficiency to be able to fly an aircraft solely by reference to
instruments. This situation is even more serious when you add
significant turbulence.
Fly Safe--
Skip Guimond
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bumper Guest
|
Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 4:25 pm Post subject: Re: EFIS |
|
|
<jguimondjr (AT) erols (DOT) com> wrote
| Quote: | Please remember the accident statistics for instrument rated power
pilots who lose their vacuum system--not a pretty picture. In order to
obtain the instrument rating you must demonstrate the ability to fly
without an attitude indicator (read using either turn and bank or turn
coordinator). History has shown that a high percentage of these cases
result in a fatal crash.
Please do not think that a solid state gyro, or any other instrument,
will eliminate the problem. It takes a lot of training and continuing
proficiency to be able to fly an aircraft solely by reference to
instruments. This situation is even more serious when you add
significant turbulence.
Fly Safe--
Skip Guimond
|
All true, Skip.
I think that any pilot who hasn't done partial panel instrument flying,
either under the hood or actual, cannot have a true appreciation for the
difficulties involved in staying upright in the clag. Both of the two recent
accidents (on fatal, one not) involving gliders in IMC were flown by very
experienced ATP rated pilots with lots of instrument time. In each case
they just had no functioning instruments available to them and thus had
little more chance of getting out of it clean than if you put the average
Joe in the cockpit, with no license at all, in the same fix.
So I guess we are talking two things here, both equally important. Make sure
the glider you fly near harms way has the appropriate instruments to carry
you safely through it. Make sure you have the current skills to use those
instruments.
At the least, I recommend renting an instructor and power plane for a good
dose of under the hood time followed by some"unusual attitude" recovery on
partial panel. If you're not willing to do that, and have no death wish,
then do yourself and family a favor and stay the heck away from any chance
of inadvertent or intentional IMC.
bumper
Minden
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bill Daniels Guest
|
Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 6:57 pm Post subject: Re: EFIS |
|
|
"bumper" <bumperm (AT) ten (DOT) tta> wrote
| Quote: |
[email]jguimondjr (AT) erols (DOT) com[/email]> wrote in message
news:1131983984.218779.268400 (AT) g49g2000cwa (DOT) googlegroups.com...
Please remember the accident statistics for instrument rated power
pilots who lose their vacuum system--not a pretty picture. In order to
obtain the instrument rating you must demonstrate the ability to fly
without an attitude indicator (read using either turn and bank or turn
coordinator). History has shown that a high percentage of these cases
result in a fatal crash.
Please do not think that a solid state gyro, or any other instrument,
will eliminate the problem. It takes a lot of training and continuing
proficiency to be able to fly an aircraft solely by reference to
instruments. This situation is even more serious when you add
significant turbulence.
Fly Safe--
Skip Guimond
All true, Skip.
I think that any pilot who hasn't done partial panel instrument flying,
either under the hood or actual, cannot have a true appreciation for the
difficulties involved in staying upright in the clag. Both of the two
recent
accidents (on fatal, one not) involving gliders in IMC were flown by very
experienced ATP rated pilots with lots of instrument time. In each case
they just had no functioning instruments available to them and thus had
little more chance of getting out of it clean than if you put the average
Joe in the cockpit, with no license at all, in the same fix.
So I guess we are talking two things here, both equally important. Make
sure
the glider you fly near harms way has the appropriate instruments to carry
you safely through it. Make sure you have the current skills to use those
instruments.
At the least, I recommend renting an instructor and power plane for a good
dose of under the hood time followed by some"unusual attitude" recovery on
partial panel. If you're not willing to do that, and have no death wish,
then do yourself and family a favor and stay the heck away from any chance
of inadvertent or intentional IMC.
bumper
Minden
|
This is very true. I would add that once acquired, partial panel skills
seem to have a longer 'shelf life' than full panel attitude instrument
flying. The thing is that today, few instrument pilots ever really learn
partial panel - being taught instead to rely on the attitude indicator.
I originally learned 'needle-ball-airspeed + wet compass & clock' instrument
flying. Later with full gyro panels, I still relied heavily on the old
style of flying. The AI and DG were just 'fancy extras' that added a little
precision. Recently, after a long absence, I donned a 'hood' and tried my
hand at instrument flying. The old NBA skills still worked but the newer
stuff felt strange. I could fly partial panel NDB holds and approaches but
a full-panel ILS made me sweat.
Unusual attitude recovery with NBA is simple and it always works. Just
center the needle with coordinated controls, step on the 'ball' and get the
desired airspeed. Too bad those damned 'turn coordinators' took over the
world. Give me an old needle and ball any day - they never lie.
Partial panel skills saved my bacon several times when the vacuum driven AI
and DG went belly up in the soup.
Bill Daniels
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bill Daniels Guest
|
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 2:24 am Post subject: Re: EFIS |
|
|
"faadpe" <faadpe (AT) REMOVETHISOziPilotsOnline (DOT) com.au> wrote
| Quote: |
ALCON....
I have a Dynon EFIS in my Nimbus 3, 26m. I have been cloud flying for
almost 10+ yrs in Florida...all legal, there are a lot of
misconceptions of this...but according to the current FAR, in the USA
cloud flying is legal.
With the EFIS, I have a Tru-Trak T&B, however, the preferred T&B is
always a 6 degree per sec turn versus a 3 degree per sec turn...due to
the slower speeds that sailplanes maneuver during thermalling.
Check out the Dynon site, they are very reasonable, simple to install
and small amperes draw as well:
http://www.dynonavionics.com
The ASH more in likely exceeded his Vne based on air density &
temperature, encounter flutter...then you know the rest of the
story...
Shawn
--
faadpe
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted via OziPilots Online [ http://www.OziPilotsOnline.com.au ]
- A website for Australian Pilots regardless of when, why, or what they
fly -
|
Guy Acheson wrote:
Shawn,
This group is discussing gliders. Battery powered
gliders. The Dynon units require 8 to 12 Watts! This
does not seem like a very practical instrument for
gliders.
-----------------------------------
That's one reason why I'm looking at Li-ion batteries.
Bill Daniels
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mike the Strike Guest
|
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 5:28 am Post subject: Re: EFIS |
|
|
I know Shawn's Nimbus and it's definitely a glider. Plenty of room for
all the batteries he needs too!
Mike
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Stefan Guest
|
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 11:00 am Post subject: Re: EFIS |
|
|
bumper wrote:
| Quote: | At the least, I recommend renting an instructor and power plane for a good
dose of under the hood time followed by some"unusual attitude" recovery on
partial panel.
|
Better than nothing, but not the real thing. There's a huge difference
between partial panel flying in a power plane (I like to call them
flying airbrakes) and a modern slippery glider.
The only valid method to learn instrument flying is to equip the back
seat of a two seater with the gyros and install a curtain to obstruct
outside view, in my opinion.
Stefan
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|