 |
AirTalk.org Aviation discussions newsgroups
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
BBB Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2005 5:51 pm Post subject: EDI-PRG |
|
|
Stats since CSA started a service from Another Scottish Airport (ASA)
in November 2004 -
Nov 2004
EDI-3873
ASA-10,675
Dec 2004
EDI-3966
ASA-11,373
Jan 2005
EDI-2823
ASA-9569
Feb 2005
EDI-3209
ASA-10,586
Mar 2005
EDI-4016
ASA-12,173
Apr 2005
EDI-4850
ASA-11,541
May 2005
EDI-7831
ASA-10,659
November 2004 - May 2005 = 212 days
EDI averaging 144 pax per day (72 each way)
ASA averaging 361 pax per day (180 each way)
B
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Callum Johnstone Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2005 5:57 pm Post subject: Re: EDI-PRG |
|
|
"BBB" <blimpie (AT) btopenworld (DOT) com> wrote
| Quote: | Stats since CSA started a service from Another Scottish Airport (ASA)
in November 2004 -
Nov 2004
EDI-3873
ASA-10,675
Dec 2004
EDI-3966
ASA-11,373
Jan 2005
EDI-2823
ASA-9569
Feb 2005
EDI-3209
ASA-10,586
Mar 2005
EDI-4016
ASA-12,173
Apr 2005
EDI-4850
ASA-11,541
May 2005
EDI-7831
ASA-10,659
November 2004 - May 2005 = 212 days
EDI averaging 144 pax per day (72 each way)
ASA averaging 361 pax per day (180 each way)
|
All very interesting, but I guess CSA felt they were getting a decent share
of the 'ASA' market themselves ... which is a great pity.
Also, we don't know what percentage of pax were connecting on to other
destinations from either EDI or 'ASA' ... it might be that more pax on the
EDI flights were using CSA to connect, and maybe this is worth more to them?
Who knows. Let's try not to over-analyse this, and just be grateful that for
the flights we do have.
Callum.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Callum Johnstone Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2005 5:58 pm Post subject: Re: EDI-PRG |
|
|
"Callum Johnstone" <callumjohnstone (AT) blueyonder (DOT) co.uk> wrote
| Quote: | All very interesting, but I guess CSA felt they were getting a decent
share
of the 'ASA' market themselves ... which is a great pity.
|
I did of course mean to say perhaps "CSA felt they *weren't* getting a
decent share of the 'ASA' market themselves" ... apologies.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BBB Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2005 6:00 pm Post subject: Re: EDI-PRG |
|
|
Callum Johnstone wrote:
| Quote: | "BBB" <blimpie (AT) btopenworld (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:1120499482.224224.15260 (AT) g43g2000cwa (DOT) googlegroups.com...
Stats since CSA started a service from Another Scottish Airport (ASA)
in November 2004 -
Nov 2004
EDI-3873
ASA-10,675
Dec 2004
EDI-3966
ASA-11,373
Jan 2005
EDI-2823
ASA-9569
Feb 2005
EDI-3209
ASA-10,586
Mar 2005
EDI-4016
ASA-12,173
Apr 2005
EDI-4850
ASA-11,541
May 2005
EDI-7831
ASA-10,659
November 2004 - May 2005 = 212 days
EDI averaging 144 pax per day (72 each way)
ASA averaging 361 pax per day (180 each way)
All very interesting, but I guess CSA felt they were getting a decent share
of the 'ASA' market themselves ... which is a great pity.
|
It is, but it's to GSM's advantage.
| Quote: | Also, we don't know what percentage of pax were connecting on to other
destinations from either EDI or 'ASA' ... it might be that more pax on the
EDI flights were using CSA to connect, and maybe this is worth more to them?
Who knows. Let's try not to over-analyse this, and just be grateful that for
the flights we do have.
|
Exactly, who knows,
B
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BBB Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2005 6:01 pm Post subject: Re: EDI-PRG |
|
|
Callum Johnstone wrote:
| Quote: | "Callum Johnstone" <callumjohnstone (AT) blueyonder (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message
news:ZLeye.22307$d75.1416 (AT) fe1 (DOT) news.blueyonder.co.uk...
All very interesting, but I guess CSA felt they were getting a decent
share
of the 'ASA' market themselves ... which is a great pity.
I did of course mean to say perhaps "CSA felt they *weren't* getting a
decent share of the 'ASA' market themselves" ... apologies.
|
I know what you meant but I'll bet CSA are kicking themselves now,
B
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Scotsbeef Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:22 pm Post subject: Re: EDI-PRG |
|
|
I suspect CSA may have checked the figures before deciding which
service to discontinue. Perhaps knowing how much revenue both services
generated would give a better idea of why one or the other was pulled.
Pax numbers alone aren't everything.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Doug Maclean Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2005 9:40 pm Post subject: Re: EDI-PRG |
|
|
"BBB" <blimpie (AT) btopenworld (DOT) com> wrote
| Quote: |
Callum Johnstone wrote:
"BBB" <blimpie (AT) btopenworld (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:1120499482.224224.15260 (AT) g43g2000cwa (DOT) googlegroups.com...
Stats since CSA started a service from Another Scottish Airport (ASA)
in November 2004 -
Nov 2004
EDI-3873
ASA-10,675
Dec 2004
EDI-3966
ASA-11,373
Jan 2005
EDI-2823
ASA-9569
Feb 2005
EDI-3209
ASA-10,586
Mar 2005
EDI-4016
ASA-12,173
Apr 2005
EDI-4850
ASA-11,541
May 2005
EDI-7831
ASA-10,659
November 2004 - May 2005 = 212 days
EDI averaging 144 pax per day (72 each way)
ASA averaging 361 pax per day (180 each way)
All very interesting, but I guess CSA felt they were getting a decent
share
of the 'ASA' market themselves ... which is a great pity.
It is, but it's to GSM's advantage.
Also, we don't know what percentage of pax were connecting on to other
destinations from either EDI or 'ASA' ... it might be that more pax on
the
EDI flights were using CSA to connect, and maybe this is worth more to
them?
Who knows. Let's try not to over-analyse this, and just be grateful that
for
the flights we do have.
Exactly, who knows,
B
|
Apparently Globespan have announced daily Glasgow Prague and CSA will be
ceasing GLA Prague at the end of this month.
Doug
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
be_positive@my-deja.com Guest
|
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 6:08 pm Post subject: Re: EDI-PRG |
|
|
BBB wrote:
....already exists and is in Eritrea.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|