AirTalk.org Forum Index AirTalk.org
Aviation discussions newsgroups
 
Archives   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

EDI-MUC should not be bookable (yet) lol !!
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AirTalk.org Forum Index -> Edinburgh Airport
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
GLAGAZ
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 3:05 pm    Post subject: EDI-MUC should not be bookable (yet) lol !! Reply with quote



According to this all the details haven't been finalised, GLA and LTN
are also fighting for the route. Looks like it should happen though.

http://news.scotsman.com/scotland.cfm?id=1961562005

Gaz

Back to top
Callum Johnstone
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 3:38 pm    Post subject: Re: EDI-MUC should not be bookable (yet) lol !! Reply with quote




"GLAGAZ" <spazgaz (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote


Quote:
According to this all the details haven't been finalised, GLA and LTN
are also fighting for the route. Looks like it should happen though.

http://news.scotsman.com/scotland.cfm?id=1961562005

I can't begin to imagine what the Evening News is talking about here, or
where they got their information from. Slots not yet finalised, maybe? GLA
and LTN presumably were contenders for the route also at one point, but I
can't believe BMI would put EDI flights on sale if they still hadn't decided
whether or not the route would op from EDI. BMI went for BRU from LTN in the
end, I believe?

Hopefully it's just a minor detail still outstanding and the route will
commence as scheduled in March.

Callum.




Back to top
Jim Mason
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 3:47 pm    Post subject: Re: EDI-MUC should not be bookable (yet) lol !! Reply with quote



In article <ZXAXe.851$MD4.624 (AT) fe1 (DOT) news.blueyonder.co.uk>,
[email]callumjohnstone (AT) blueyonder (DOT) co.uk[/email] says...
Quote:

"GLAGAZ" <spazgaz (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:1127142354.575604.231050 (AT) f14g2000cwb (DOT) googlegroups.com...

According to this all the details haven't been finalised, GLA and LTN
are also fighting for the route. Looks like it should happen though.

http://news.scotsman.com/scotland.cfm?id=1961562005

I can't begin to imagine what the Evening News is talking about here

The Evening News like their counterpart in the west are notorious for
not actually checking facts before publishing items. At times -
journalism at it's worst.

Jim

Back to top
Callum Johnstone
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 3:50 pm    Post subject: Re: EDI-MUC should not be bookable (yet) lol !! Reply with quote


"Jim Mason" <jim.mason (AT) spamtrappedukonline (DOT) co.uk> wrote


Quote:
The Evening News like their counterpart in the west are notorious for
not actually checking facts before publishing items. At times -
journalism at it's worst.

Indeed. All they're likely to have achieved here, besides confusing the hell
out of us, is to have sparked concern among people who may already have
purchased tickets for this service.



Back to top
admin
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 3:54 pm    Post subject: Re: EDI-MUC should not be bookable (yet) lol !! Reply with quote

The message <ZXAXe.851$MD4.624 (AT) fe1 (DOT) news.blueyonder.co.uk>
from "Callum Johnstone" <callumjohnstone (AT) blueyonder (DOT) co.uk> contains
these words:


Quote:
I can't begin to imagine what the Evening News is talking about here, or
where they got their information from. Slots not yet finalised, maybe? GLA
and LTN presumably were contenders

GLA was not mentioned in the article, for 'Glasgow' read Glasgow
Prestwick International.?

BAA are hardly going to compete against themselves.?

--
Beware imitators, beware agenda changers, [email]admin (AT) edinburghairport (DOT) org.uk[/email] is
the only OFFICIAL newsgroup contact. 100% Bill Gleeson free..
Visit: www.edinburghairport.org.uk and
http://www.yabbers.com/phpbb/viewforum.php?f=22&mforum=bni
Subscribe to: alt.airports.uk.edinburgh... Europe's busiest aviation newsgroup

Back to top
Jim Mason
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:01 pm    Post subject: Re: EDI-MUC should not be bookable (yet) lol !! Reply with quote

In article <s7BXe.858$MD4.65 (AT) fe1 (DOT) news.blueyonder.co.uk>,
[email]callumjohnstone (AT) blueyonder (DOT) co.uk[/email] says...
Quote:

"Jim Mason" <jim.mason (AT) spamtrappedukonline (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message
news:MPG.1d98edf07d456b5198a90e (AT) News (DOT) Individual.NET...

The Evening News like their counterpart in the west are notorious for
not actually checking facts before publishing items. At times -
journalism at it's worst.

Indeed. All they're likely to have achieved here, besides confusing the hell
out of us, is to have sparked concern among people who may already have
purchased tickets for this service.

A similar situtaion achieved by the Evening Times by creating the
impression that easyJet were pulling their GLA-AMS service a month early
3 weeks ago.

Jim

Back to top
Joe Curry
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:03 pm    Post subject: Re: EDI-MUC should not be bookable (yet) lol !! Reply with quote

The message <s7BXe.858$MD4.65 (AT) fe1 (DOT) news.blueyonder.co.uk>
from "Callum Johnstone" <callumjohnstone (AT) blueyonder (DOT) co.uk> contains
these words:


Quote:
The Evening News like their counterpart in the west are notorious for
not actually checking facts before publishing items. At times -
journalism at it's worst.

Indeed. All they're likely to have achieved here, besides confusing
the hell
out of us, is to have sparked concern among people who may already have
purchased tickets for this service.

I know which evening paper I would trust... The EEN article raised
concerns..what's wrong
with that.?

--
www.edinburghairport.org.uk Edinburgh Scotland International

Scotland's most convenient/accessible/profitable/airport
The International Gateway with Scotland's busiest runway.
http://www2.germanwings.com/en/images/edinburgh_en.gif
http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?userid=1753

Back to top
Callum Johnstone
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:08 pm    Post subject: Re: EDI-MUC should not be bookable (yet) lol !! Reply with quote


"Joe Curry" <ability (AT) zetnet (DOT) co.uk> wrote


Quote:
I know which evening paper I would trust... The EEN article raised
concerns..what's wrong
with that.?

Nothing, provided they can fully explain what their 'concerns' are based on.
They haven't really done that, and they've failed to track down a BMI
spokesperson to set the record straight. If the route is going ahead, as
seems likely, why cause a panic with all this nonsense?



Back to top
Fraser
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:14 pm    Post subject: Re: EDI-MUC should not be bookable (yet) lol !! Reply with quote


"Jim Mason" <jim.mason (AT) spamtrappedukonline (DOT) co.uk> wrote


Quote:
The Evening News like their counterpart in the west are notorious for
not actually checking facts before publishing items. At times -
journalism at it's worst.

Punctuation at ITS worst ^^^



Back to top
Jim Mason
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:14 pm    Post subject: Re: EDI-MUC should not be bookable (yet) lol !! Reply with quote

In article <s7BXe.858$MD4.65 (AT) fe1 (DOT) news.blueyonder.co.uk>,
[email]callumjohnstone (AT) blueyonder (DOT) co.uk[/email] says...
Quote:

"Jim Mason" <jim.mason (AT) spamtrappedukonline (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message
news:MPG.1d98edf07d456b5198a90e (AT) News (DOT) Individual.NET...

The Evening News like their counterpart in the west are notorious for
not actually checking facts before publishing items. At times -
journalism at it's worst.

Indeed. All they're likely to have achieved here, besides confusing the hell
out of us, is to have sparked concern among people who may already have
purchased tickets for this service.

Perhaps an email to the journalist concerned and the airline would get
some clarification Callum? To be fair to David Leask at the ET he is
actually interested in the subject he writes about and appreciates
feedback - perhaps his counterpart at the Evening News might have
similar feelings?

easyJet press office were most appreciative of the feedback re press
innaccuracies a few weeks ago and I am now in receipt of a most useful
voucher!

But I totally agree Callum all the article has done is to raise concerns
for people who had already or had intended to book this service. If the
service hadn't been secured it would actually be illegal for tickets to
be sold for it. I cannot believe for a second the airline is that naive.
I suspect the transport correspondent at the Evening News might well be.

Jim

Back to top
Jim Mason
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:15 pm    Post subject: Re: EDI-MUC should not be bookable (yet) lol !! Reply with quote

In article <DnBXe.866$MD4.407 (AT) fe1 (DOT) news.blueyonder.co.uk>,
[email]callumjohnstone (AT) blueyonder (DOT) co.uk[/email] says...
Quote:

"Joe Curry" <ability (AT) zetnet (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message
news:2005091917035966937 (AT) zetnet (DOT) co.uk...

I know which evening paper I would trust... The EEN article raised
concerns..what's wrong
with that.?

Nothing, provided they can fully explain what their 'concerns' are based on.
They haven't really done that, and they've failed to track down a BMI
spokesperson to set the record straight. If the route is going ahead, as
seems likely, why cause a panic with all this nonsense?

I totally agree Callum - space filling nonsense.

Jim

Back to top
Jim Mason
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:16 pm    Post subject: Re: EDI-MUC should not be bookable (yet) lol !! Reply with quote

In article <432ee3da$0$1312$ed2619ec (AT) ptn-nntp-reader02 (DOT) plus.net>,
[email]fraser (AT) lanakil (DOT) freeserve.co.uk[/email] says...
Quote:

"Jim Mason" <jim.mason (AT) spamtrappedukonline (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message
news:MPG.1d98edf07d456b5198a90e (AT) News (DOT) Individual.NET...

The Evening News like their counterpart in the west are notorious for
not actually checking facts before publishing items. At times -
journalism at it's worst.

Punctuation at ITS worst ^^^

Indeed. Thanks for your ever useful contribution.

Jim

Back to top
Iain
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:19 pm    Post subject: Re: EDI-MUC should not be bookable (yet) lol !! Reply with quote

"Jim Mason" <jim.mason (AT) spamtrappedukonline (DOT) co.uk> wrote

Quote:
In article <s7BXe.858$MD4.65 (AT) fe1 (DOT) news.blueyonder.co.uk>,
[email]callumjohnstone (AT) blueyonder (DOT) co.uk[/email] says...

"Jim Mason" <jim.mason (AT) spamtrappedukonline (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message
news:MPG.1d98edf07d456b5198a90e (AT) News (DOT) Individual.NET...

The Evening News like their counterpart in the west are notorious for
not actually checking facts before publishing items. At times -
journalism at it's worst.

Indeed. All they're likely to have achieved here, besides confusing the
hell
out of us, is to have sparked concern among people who may already have
purchased tickets for this service.

A similar situtaion achieved by the Evening Times by creating the
impression that easyJet were pulling their GLA-AMS service a month early
3 weeks ago.

Jim

I thought this later bit was pretty choice as well:

"Currently, the possible destinations in Germany are Cologne, which is
served by the Germanwings airline, and Hamburg - served by Hapag-Lloyd
Express.

But BMI would be the first major airline to fly to the country from the
Capital"

Presumably LH are not a major airline - I think they'll be surprised to hear
that!!! What an idiot - and he's supposedly the "Transport Reporter"!



Back to top
Joe Curry
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:27 pm    Post subject: Re: EDI-MUC should not be bookable (yet) lol !! Reply with quote

The message <DnBXe.866$MD4.407 (AT) fe1 (DOT) news.blueyonder.co.uk>
from "Callum Johnstone" <callumjohnstone (AT) blueyonder (DOT) co.uk> contains
these words:



Quote:
Nothing, provided they can fully explain what their 'concerns' are
based on.
They haven't really done that, and they've failed to track down a BMI
spokesperson to set the record straight. If the route is going ahead, as
seems likely, why cause a panic with all this nonsense?

They are raising concerns by not tracking down a bmi spokesperson?

--
www.edinburghairport.org.uk Edinburgh Scotland International

Scotland's most convenient/accessible/profitable/airport
The International Gateway with Scotland's busiest runway.
http://www2.germanwings.com/en/images/edinburgh_en.gif
http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?userid=1753

Back to top
Joe Curry
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:27 pm    Post subject: Re: EDI-MUC should not be bookable (yet) lol !! Reply with quote

The message <432ee3da$0$1312$ed2619ec (AT) ptn-nntp-reader02 (DOT) plus.net>
from "Fraser" <fraser (AT) lanakil (DOT) freeserve.co.uk> contains these words:


Quote:
The Evening News like their counterpart in the west are notorious for
not actually checking facts before publishing items. At times -
journalism at it's worst.

Punctuation at ITS worst ^^^

Your new here? :-)

--
www.edinburghairport.org.uk Edinburgh Scotland International

Scotland's most convenient/accessible/profitable/airport
The International Gateway with Scotland's busiest runway.
http://www2.germanwings.com/en/images/edinburgh_en.gif
http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?userid=1753

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AirTalk.org Forum Index -> Edinburgh Airport All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 1 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2006 phpBB Group
SEO toolkit © 2004-2006 webmedic.