AirTalk.org Aviation discussions newsgroups   Archives   FAQ   Search   Memberlist   Usergroups   Register   Profile   Log in to check your private messages   Log in  EA-6B vs. Insurgents          AirTalk.org Forum Index -> Naval Aviation View previous topic :: View next topic   Author Message dumpster4@hotmail.com Guest Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2005 5:59 pm    Post subject: EA-6B vs. Insurgents The EA-6B and its USQ-113 jammer are proving surprisingly useful against the insurgents. See: http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?F=1207372&C=america Though all the jamming and other emissions from Army IED jammers, EA-6B's and other sources, is causing an electromagnetic "pollution" problem. See: http://aviationnow.com/avnow/news/channel_awst_story.jsp?id=news/11075p2.xml Back to top John Doe Guest Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 12:49 am    Post subject: Re: EA-6B vs. Insurgents <dumpster4 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote Quote: The EA-6B and its USQ-113 jammer are proving surprisingly useful against the insurgents. See: http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?F=1207372&C=america Though all the jamming and other emissions from Army IED jammers, EA-6B's and other sources, is causing an electromagnetic "pollution" problem. See: http://aviationnow.com/avnow/news/channel_awst_story.jsp?id=news/11075p2.xml Correction: "WAS" useful against the insurgents. I'm sure after they read this, they'll change their tactics...... Back to top Paul J. Adam Guest Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 5:19 pm    Post subject: Re: EA-6B vs. Insurgents In message <0Ibcf.1622$om5.617@dukeread04>, John Doe <divx (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> writes Quote: [email]dumpster4 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com[/email]> wrote in message news:1131472766.520051.287750 (AT) g44g2000cwa (DOT) googlegroups.com... The EA-6B and its USQ-113 jammer are proving surprisingly useful against the insurgents. See: http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?F=1207372&C=america Though all the jamming and other emissions from Army IED jammers, EA-6B's and other sources, is causing an electromagnetic "pollution" problem. See: http://aviationnow.com/avnow/news/channel_awst_story.jsp?id=news/11075p2.xml Correction: "WAS" useful against the insurgents. I'm sure after they read this, they'll change their tactics...... Yeah, because they wouldn't notice what's happening around them, they've never heard of force-protection ECM, they haven't been adapting their TTPs all along, and only a stray post on Usenet tipped them off. -- He thinks too much: such men are dangerous. Julius Caesar I:2 Paul J. Adam MainBox<at>jrwlynch[dot]demon{dot}co(.)uk Back to top Display posts from previous: All Posts1 Day7 Days2 Weeks1 Month3 Months6 Months1 Year Oldest FirstNewest First         AirTalk.org Forum Index -> Naval Aviation All times are GMT Page 1 of 1   Jump to: Select a forum Aviation----------------alt.aviationAviation safety EnhancementPlanes, gliders and flying in AustraliaAviation et pilotage (Français)rec.aviationAviation (Aerobatics)Hot air, gas balloons and airshipsHang-gliding, paragliding, foot-launched flightAircraft Design & BuildingInstrument Flight RulesAviation (Classifieds)Military AircraftNaval AviationAviation (Miscellaneous Topics)Owning AirplanesAviators (General Discussions)Aviation related productsAircraft RestorationHelicopters and rotary wing aircraftsFlight SimulationSailplanesAviation (Students)Light aircraftFlying related activities in the UK Airports----------------alt.airportsEdinburgh Airport Glasgow Airport Humberside Airport Luton Airport Aberdeen Airport Glasgow Prestwick Airport  You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2006 phpBB Group SEO toolkit © 2004-2006 webmedic.