AirTalk.org Forum Index AirTalk.org
Aviation discussions newsgroups
 
Archives   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Daytime Landing Lights.

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AirTalk.org Forum Index -> Planes, gliders and flying in Australia
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Peter Creswick
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Dec 22, 2003 5:29 am    Post subject: Daytime Landing Lights. Reply with quote



Well now we know where the thinking for that SUP came from.
If you want to read some absolute drivel, try this gem.
http://www.atsb.gov.au/road/res-exec/cr218ex.cfm
http://www.atsb.gov.au/road/pdf/cr218.pdf
Back to top
Peter Creswick
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Dec 22, 2003 6:05 am    Post subject: Re: Daytime Landing Lights. Reply with quote



Quote:
"mqd_117.3" wrote:
They're kidding, right????


No, they aren't.

Back to top
mqd_117.3
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Dec 22, 2003 6:17 am    Post subject: Re: Daytime Landing Lights. Reply with quote




Peter Creswick wrote:
Quote:
*Well now we know where the thinking for that SUP came from.
If you want to read some absolute drivel, try this gem.
http://www.atsb.gov.au/road/res-exec/cr218ex.cfm
http://www.atsb.gov.au/road/pdf/cr218.pdf *

They're kidding, right????

MQD_117.3


--
mqd_117.3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted via OziPilots Online [ http://www.OziPilotsOnline.com.au ]
- A website for Australian Pilots regardless of when, why, or what they fly -


Back to top
RT
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Dec 22, 2003 8:30 am    Post subject: Re: Daytime Landing Lights. Reply with quote


Peter Creswick wrote in message <3FE689BB.60DB2947 (AT) ihug (DOT) com.au>...
Quote:
"mqd_117.3" wrote:
They're kidding, right????


No, they aren't.

Poor, suffering English language: "Comprehensive reviews incorporating
meta-analysis by Elvik (1996) and Koornstra et al. (1979) have systematised
these results." In the old days it would have been: "Results have been
tabulated by..."

Who's this Koomstra? - I've come across that name before..

Particularly liked the bit where it said a Canadian study found using
daytime running lights (DRL) reduced head-on collisions by 5% - they didn't
give the figures for side or rear collisions...

Datum point - got pulled up by the coppers in Finland in 1980 because I
didn't have the headlights on and was outside a town/city.



Back to top
Centurion
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Dec 23, 2003 12:08 am    Post subject: Re: Daytime Landing Lights. Reply with quote

Peter Creswick wrote:

Quote:
Well now we know where the thinking for that SUP came from.
If you want to read some absolute drivel, try this gem.
http://www.atsb.gov.au/road/res-exec/cr218ex.cfm
http://www.atsb.gov.au/road/pdf/cr218.pdf

....and considering motorcycles in Australia USED to have hard-wired daytime
running lights (headlights) but, the particular ADR has been repealed coz
it didn't work[1], means this latest study is nothing more than another
waste of our tax dollars. Makes me feel all warm and fuzzy.

[1] - work: as in "it didn't result in a significant reduction in
multi-vehicle accidents involving motorcycles".

James
--
Fortune cookie says:
The first version always gets thrown away.


Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AirTalk.org Forum Index -> Planes, gliders and flying in Australia All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2006 phpBB Group
SEO toolkit © 2004-2006 webmedic.