 |
AirTalk.org Aviation discussions newsgroups
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Peter Creswick Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Peter Creswick Guest
|
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2003 6:05 am Post subject: Re: Daytime Landing Lights. |
|
|
| Quote: | "mqd_117.3" wrote:
They're kidding, right????
|
No, they aren't.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mqd_117.3 Guest
|
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2003 6:17 am Post subject: Re: Daytime Landing Lights. |
|
|
Peter Creswick wrote:
They're kidding, right????
MQD_117.3
--
mqd_117.3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted via OziPilots Online [ http://www.OziPilotsOnline.com.au ]
- A website for Australian Pilots regardless of when, why, or what they fly -
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RT Guest
|
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2003 8:30 am Post subject: Re: Daytime Landing Lights. |
|
|
Peter Creswick wrote in message <3FE689BB.60DB2947 (AT) ihug (DOT) com.au>...
| Quote: | "mqd_117.3" wrote:
They're kidding, right????
No, they aren't.
|
Poor, suffering English language: "Comprehensive reviews incorporating
meta-analysis by Elvik (1996) and Koornstra et al. (1979) have systematised
these results." In the old days it would have been: "Results have been
tabulated by..."
Who's this Koomstra? - I've come across that name before..
Particularly liked the bit where it said a Canadian study found using
daytime running lights (DRL) reduced head-on collisions by 5% - they didn't
give the figures for side or rear collisions...
Datum point - got pulled up by the coppers in Finland in 1980 because I
didn't have the headlights on and was outside a town/city.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Centurion Guest
|
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2003 12:08 am Post subject: Re: Daytime Landing Lights. |
|
|
Peter Creswick wrote:
....and considering motorcycles in Australia USED to have hard-wired daytime
running lights (headlights) but, the particular ADR has been repealed coz
it didn't work[1], means this latest study is nothing more than another
waste of our tax dollars. Makes me feel all warm and fuzzy.
[1] - work: as in "it didn't result in a significant reduction in
multi-vehicle accidents involving motorcycles".
James
--
Fortune cookie says:
The first version always gets thrown away.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|