AirTalk.org Forum Index AirTalk.org
Aviation discussions newsgroups
 
Archives   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

air crash investigation TV show

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AirTalk.org Forum Index -> Planes, gliders and flying in Australia
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Brian May
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Apr 26, 2005 12:18 pm    Post subject: air crash investigation TV show Reply with quote



Hello,

The recent TV show said breakdowns in communications, between flight
crew, between flight crew and ATC, and between ATC contributed to this
accident.

I was curious: what mechanisms, if any, does ATC have to pass critical
safety/emergency information on the next controller during the hand
off?

I got the impression that ATCO were so busy with the high workload,
that each controller forgot to pass on the emergency situation (low
fuel) to the next controller.

I can understand though that the ATCO may not appreciate "request
priority" (or whatever) to mean the same thing as "MAYDAY MAYDAY
MAYDAY" under such conditions, despite the criticism they received. To
me, the first might mean "I am in a hurry to meet my schedule", not
"we only have x minutes fuel left". Even "we are running low on fuel"
could mean "we don't have as much fuel as we would like to have and
soon will start using our reserves".

I imagine if the pilots had squawked the emergency code it would have
made a big difference.

From my comfortable arm chair Wink, it also seems a relevant point that
the captain wasn't satisfied that the copilot had declared an
emergency (maybe he was also listening for a "MAYDAY" keyword too),
but didn't make a transmission himself (surely he should be able to
say "MAYDAY" himself despite his language issues) or change the
transponder.
--
Brian May <bam (AT) snoopy (DOT) apana.org.au>
Back to top
AA
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Apr 27, 2005 1:01 am    Post subject: Re: air crash investigation TV show Reply with quote



"Brian May" <bam (AT) snoopy (DOT) apana.org.au> wrote

snip
Quote:
I can understand though that the ATCO may not appreciate "request
priority" (or whatever) to mean the same thing as "MAYDAY MAYDAY
MAYDAY" under such conditions, despite the criticism they received. To
me, the first might mean "I am in a hurry to meet my schedule", not
"we only have x minutes fuel left". Even "we are running low on fuel"
could mean "we don't have as much fuel as we would like to have and
soon will start using our reserves".


We get regular requests for upgrade of priority. Some of the reasons given:
Late for connecting flight
Been flying all day and am worn out and don't want to do two holding
patterns
Fuel will be on minimums if I have to hold - The meaning of this varies
between "I will have my reserves left" to "I've got 10 mins fuel left"
etc

My response to a pilot request for priority is "Are you declaring an
emergency?"
If you declare an emergency, you will be given appropriate priority.
AA




Back to top
Dom
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Apr 27, 2005 7:54 am    Post subject: Re: air crash investigation TV show Reply with quote




"AA" <sirronnala (AT) REMove (DOT) yahoo.com.au> wrote



Quote:

My response to a pilot request for priority is "Are you declaring an
emergency?"
If you declare an emergency, you will be given appropriate priority.
AA


.... and if the answer is in the negative, does the pilot receive any
preferential treatment at all? In other words, is there any point asking for
priority without declaring an emergency?

Dom



Back to top
AA
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:32 am    Post subject: Re: air crash investigation TV show Reply with quote


"Dom" <NOmoadslspam (AT) tpg (DOT) nospam.com.au> wrote

Quote:

"AA" <sirronnala (AT) REMove (DOT) yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:426ee45c$0$27011$5a62ac22 (AT) per-qv1-newsreader-01 (DOT) iinet.net.au...



My response to a pilot request for priority is "Are you declaring an
emergency?"
If you declare an emergency, you will be given appropriate priority.
AA


... and if the answer is in the negative, does the pilot receive any
preferential treatment at all? In other words, is there any point asking
for
priority without declaring an emergency?


Not much point - the pilot will receive the priority he is entitled to.
However, there are always exceptions Smile
AA



Back to top
Martin Cowley
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 2:02 am    Post subject: Re: air crash investigation TV show Reply with quote

On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 21:32:06 +1000, "AA"
<sirronnala (AT) REMove (DOT) yahoo.com.au> wrote:

Quote:

"Dom" <NOmoadslspam (AT) tpg (DOT) nospam.com.au> wrote in message
news:426f4517$1 (AT) dnews (DOT) tpgi.com.au...

"AA" <sirronnala (AT) REMove (DOT) yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:426ee45c$0$27011$5a62ac22 (AT) per-qv1-newsreader-01 (DOT) iinet.net.au...



My response to a pilot request for priority is "Are you declaring an
emergency?"
If you declare an emergency, you will be given appropriate priority.
AA


... and if the answer is in the negative, does the pilot receive any
preferential treatment at all? In other words, is there any point asking
for
priority without declaring an emergency?


Not much point - the pilot will receive the priority he is entitled to.
However, there are always exceptions Smile
AA

Idle curiosity - does a pilot who declares an emergency have to make a
formal report after landing or is he/she subject to any sort of
followup?


Back to top
Brian Bosley
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 11:07 am    Post subject: Re: air crash investigation TV show Reply with quote


"Martin Cowley" <mcowley (AT) senet_remove_this_ (DOT) com.au> wrote in
message news:svg071tejfepigf0mm6f3qeu1sr2un9aio (AT) 4ax (DOT) com...
Quote:
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 21:32:06 +1000, "AA"
[email]sirronnala (AT) REMove (DOT) yahoo.com.au[/email]> wrote:


"Dom" <NOmoadslspam (AT) tpg (DOT) nospam.com.au> wrote in message
news:426f4517$1 (AT) dnews (DOT) tpgi.com.au...

"AA" <sirronnala (AT) REMove (DOT) yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:426ee45c$0$27011$5a62ac22 (AT) per-qv1-newsreader-01 (DOT) iinet.net.au...



My response to a pilot request for priority is "Are you
declaring an
emergency?"
If you declare an emergency, you will be given appropriate
priority.
AA


... and if the answer is in the negative, does the pilot
receive any
preferential treatment at all? In other words, is there any
point asking
for
priority without declaring an emergency?


Not much point - the pilot will receive the priority he is
entitled to.
However, there are always exceptions Smile
AA

Idle curiosity - does a pilot who declares an emergency have to
make a
formal report after landing or is he/she subject to any sort of
followup?

It used to be an automatic requirement for an Air Saftey Incident

Report from both the pilot and the ATS officer first aware ot the
emergency. Don't know about now though. There's been a few
babies thrown out with the bath water since then

Brian Bosley



Back to top
AA
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 12:31 pm    Post subject: Re: air crash investigation TV show Reply with quote

"Martin Cowley" <mcowley (AT) senet_remove_this_ (DOT) com.au> wrote

Quote:
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 21:32:06 +1000, "AA"

Idle curiosity - does a pilot who declares an emergency have to make a
formal report after landing or is he/she subject to any sort of
followup?


ATC will submit an incident report - our documentation requires it.
If the event meets the definition of an incident (it's pretty broad) or an
accident the pilot must submit a report.
It is then up to ATSB as to whether or not they investigate. ATSB have
policies on what they will or won't investigate.
CASA may also follow up incident reports - mainly what they see as breaches
of regs, airworthiness issues etc.
Airservices conduct internal investigations of ATS related incidents. This
is in addition to any investigation that ATSB may carry out.
AA



Back to top
Brian May
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 11:05 pm    Post subject: Re: air crash investigation TV show Reply with quote

Quote:
"Brian" == Brian Bosley <bosbrian (AT) ozemail (DOT) com.au> writes:

Brian> It used to be an automatic requirement for an Air Saftey
Brian> Incident Report from both the pilot and the ATS officer
Brian> first aware ot the emergency. Don't know about now though.
Brian> There's been a few babies thrown out with the bath water
Brian> since then

I think it depends on the nature of the emergency. The exact criteria
is listed in the AIP. One of the points currently listed, as an
immediately reportable matter for air transport operations is:

* the aircraft's supply of useable fuel becoming so low (whether or
not as a result of fuel starvation) that the pilot declares an
emergency in flight.

For non-air transport operations the above doesn't apply, instead it is
a routine reportable matter, with slightly different wording:

* the aircraft's supply of useable fuel becoming so low (whether or
not as a result of fuel starvation) that the safety of the aircraft
is compromised.

Which is strange, as it implies that an air transport operation
doesn't need to fill in any extra paper work if the failed to declare
an emergency, even if the safety of the aircraft was
compromised. Yuck.

Either that, or I misread something ;-)

At the very least, I think ATC are going to want to know what happened
(if they don't already know).
--
Brian May <bam (AT) snoopy (DOT) apana.org.au>

Back to top
Martin Cowley
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 11:34 pm    Post subject: Re: air crash investigation TV show Reply with quote

On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 22:31:11 +1000, "AA"
<sirronnala (AT) REMove (DOT) yahoo.com.au> wrote:

Quote:
"Martin Cowley" <mcowley (AT) senet_remove_this_ (DOT) com.au> wrote in message
news:svg071tejfepigf0mm6f3qeu1sr2un9aio (AT) 4ax (DOT) com...
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 21:32:06 +1000, "AA"

Idle curiosity - does a pilot who declares an emergency have to make a
formal report after landing or is he/she subject to any sort of
followup?


ATC will submit an incident report - our documentation requires it.
If the event meets the definition of an incident (it's pretty broad) or an
accident the pilot must submit a report.
It is then up to ATSB as to whether or not they investigate. ATSB have
policies on what they will or won't investigate.
CASA may also follow up incident reports - mainly what they see as breaches
of regs, airworthiness issues etc.
Airservices conduct internal investigations of ATS related incidents. This
is in addition to any investigation that ATSB may carry out.
AA

Thanks Alan - curiosity satisfied!


Back to top
Brian Bosley
Guest





PostPosted: Sun May 01, 2005 10:01 am    Post subject: Re: air crash investigation TV show Reply with quote


"Brian May" <bam (AT) snoopy (DOT) apana.org.au> wrote

Quote:
"Brian" == Brian Bosley <bosbrian (AT) ozemail (DOT) com.au> writes:

Brian> It used to be an automatic requirement for an Air
Saftey
Brian> Incident Report from both the pilot and the ATS
officer
Brian> first aware ot the emergency. Don't know about now
though.
Brian> There's been a few babies thrown out with the bath
water
Brian> since then

I think it depends on the nature of the emergency. The exact
criteria
is listed in the AIP. One of the points currently listed, as an
immediately reportable matter for air transport operations is:

* the aircraft's supply of useable fuel becoming so low
(whether or
not as a result of fuel starvation) that the pilot declares an
emergency in flight.

For non-air transport operations the above doesn't apply,
instead it is
a routine reportable matter, with slightly different wording:

* the aircraft's supply of useable fuel becoming so low
(whether or
not as a result of fuel starvation) that the safety of the
aircraft
is compromised.

Which is strange, as it implies that an air transport operation
doesn't need to fill in any extra paper work if the failed to
declare
an emergency, even if the safety of the aircraft was
compromised. Yuck.

Either that, or I misread something ;-)

At the very least, I think ATC are going to want to know what
happened
(if they don't already know).
--
Brian May

I was assuming that by "declaring and emergency" meant
transmitting "mayday" or "pan" which AFAIK is the proper way to
do so.
In which case, an ASIR used to be automatic. (regardless of ops
type or acft type)



Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AirTalk.org Forum Index -> Planes, gliders and flying in Australia All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2006 phpBB Group
SEO toolkit © 2004-2006 webmedic.