 |
AirTalk.org Aviation discussions newsgroups
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Coop Guest
|
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 6:49 am Post subject: Affordable Safety |
|
|
Stumbled across this definition of "affordable safety"
"All lives have equal value and that value is infinite. This means that
because the Australian people only have a finite amount of money to
spend on such issues as air safety, objectively based scientific risk
analysis must be used to allocate the dollars so the maximum number of
lives are saved."
Not surprisingly, found this on DS's website:
http://www.dicksmithflyer.com.au/Content.php?ContentID=370
Coop
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SR20GOER Guest
|
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 7:28 am Post subject: Re: Affordable Safety |
|
|
I do not disagree with the philosophy, however I need to reflect on the
implementation.
A private pilot flying a high performance single takes and expects a
different level of risk, and creation and control of that risk, to that of a
RPT passenger expecting to get on the "bus", ignore the safety brief, and
get off safely at the other end without spilling the coffee in flight.
I guess the scientific analysis needs a fairly broad base of factors.
"Coop" <vhbdq (AT) chariotnose (DOT) netwheel.au> wrote
| Quote: | Stumbled across this definition of "affordable safety"
"All lives have equal value and that value is infinite. This means that
because the Australian people only have a finite amount of money to spend
on such issues as air safety, objectively based scientific risk analysis
must be used to allocate the dollars so the maximum number of lives are
saved."
Not surprisingly, found this on DS's website:
http://www.dicksmithflyer.com.au/Content.php?ContentID=370
Coop
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BB Guest
|
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 8:33 am Post subject: Re: Affordable Safety |
|
|
Coop wrote:
| Quote: | Stumbled across this definition of "affordable safety"
"All lives have equal value and that value is infinite. This means that
because the Australian people only have a finite amount of money to
spend on such issues as air safety, objectively based scientific risk
analysis must be used to allocate the dollars so the maximum number of
lives are saved."
Not surprisingly, found this on DS's website:
http://www.dicksmithflyer.com.au/Content.php?ContentID=370
|
Hmmm... how can the value of lives be "infinite" when there are always
people looking at ways of doing safety on the cheap?...
Regards,
BB.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tailspin Guest
|
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 11:11 am Post subject: Re: Affordable Safety |
|
|
Here's another one for you to think about.
"Tombstone Maintenance"
Work out what it costs to do the maintenance or modification and compare
that to what the insurance cost is if the "bus" goes in.
If the insurance is cheaper don't do the maintenance jus pay the insurance
and take the risk.
"Coop" <vhbdq (AT) chariotnose (DOT) netwheel.au> wrote
| Quote: | Stumbled across this definition of "affordable safety"
"All lives have equal value and that value is infinite. This means that
because the Australian people only have a finite amount of money to spend
on such issues as air safety, objectively based scientific risk analysis
must be used to allocate the dollars so the maximum number of lives are
saved."
Not surprisingly, found this on DS's website:
http://www.dicksmithflyer.com.au/Content.php?ContentID=370
Coop
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Graeme Hogan Guest
|
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 11:12 am Post subject: Re: Affordable Safety |
|
|
"SR20GOER" <sr20goerDONTSPAM (AT) ozipilotsonline (DOT) com.au> wrote
| Quote: | I do not disagree with the philosophy, however I need to reflect on the
implementation.
A private pilot flying a high performance single takes and expects a
different level of risk, and creation and control of that risk, to that of
a
RPT passenger expecting to get on the "bus", ignore the safety brief, and
get off safely at the other end without spilling the coffee in flight.
|
But what if I'm the bus driver ?.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BB Guest
|
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 11:21 am Post subject: Re: Affordable Safety |
|
|
Tailspin wrote:
| Quote: | Here's another one for you to think about.
"Tombstone Maintenance"
Work out what it costs to do the maintenance or modification and compare
that to what the insurance cost is if the "bus" goes in.
If the insurance is cheaper don't do the maintenance jus pay the insurance
and take the risk.
|
Another book I suggest people read is "The Naked Pilot - Human Factors
in Aircraft Accidents" by David Beaty... Despite what the title reads
it is about more than pilots... There is a chapter in this book with
that title...
Regards,
BB.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SR20GOER Guest
|
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 10:02 pm Post subject: Re: Affordable Safety |
|
|
Graeme
Most RPT buses have two fans minimum and a higher level of redundant safety
factor.
Think of a PPL in a single at night - even worse over water or tiger country
and taking the direct route - and I still believe it's a higher level of
risk.
Also, training wise, the bus driver is CPL or higher.
Not to say the bus driver does not have worries, but I'm talking
comparative.
"Graeme Hogan" <ghogan01 (AT) optusnet (DOT) com.au> wrote
| Quote: |
"SR20GOER" <sr20goerDONTSPAM (AT) ozipilotsonline (DOT) com.au> wrote in message
news:42abe40e$0$14478$5a62ac22 (AT) per-qv1-newsreader-01 (DOT) iinet.net.au...
I do not disagree with the philosophy, however I need to reflect on the
implementation.
A private pilot flying a high performance single takes and expects a
different level of risk, and creation and control of that risk, to that
of
a
RPT passenger expecting to get on the "bus", ignore the safety brief, and
get off safely at the other end without spilling the coffee in flight.
But what if I'm the bus driver ?.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ventus45@hotmail.com Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2005 1:43 pm Post subject: Re: Affordable Safety |
|
|
Graeme Hogan wrote:
But what if I'm the bus driver ?.
They are only interested in the safety of the fare paying pax, not the
hired help, or anyone else.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Coop Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 2:43 pm Post subject: Re: Affordable Safety |
|
|
SR20GOER wrote:
| Quote: | I do not disagree with the philosophy, however I need to reflect on the
implementation.
A private pilot flying a high performance single takes and expects a
different level of risk, and creation and control of that risk, to that of a
RPT passenger expecting to get on the "bus", ignore the safety brief, and
get off safely at the other end without spilling the coffee in flight.
I guess the scientific analysis needs a fairly broad base of factors.
|
I'm inclined to agree- one accident in GA might mean one life lost. One
accident in RPT usually means many lives lost. Not hard to see where the
focus is needed.
Coop
| Quote: |
"Coop" <vhbdq (AT) chariotnose (DOT) netwheel.au> wrote in message
news:42ABDAF1.1000704 (AT) chariotnose (DOT) netwheel.au...
Stumbled across this definition of "affordable safety"
"All lives have equal value and that value is infinite. This means that
because the Australian people only have a finite amount of money to spend
on such issues as air safety, objectively based scientific risk analysis
must be used to allocate the dollars so the maximum number of lives are
saved."
Not surprisingly, found this on DS's website:
http://www.dicksmithflyer.com.au/Content.php?ContentID=370
Coop
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Coop Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 2:44 pm Post subject: Re: Affordable Safety |
|
|
BB wrote:
| Quote: |
Coop wrote:
Stumbled across this definition of "affordable safety"
"All lives have equal value and that value is infinite. This means that
because the Australian people only have a finite amount of money to
spend on such issues as air safety, objectively based scientific risk
analysis must be used to allocate the dollars so the maximum number of
lives are saved."
Not surprisingly, found this on DS's website:
http://www.dicksmithflyer.com.au/Content.php?ContentID=370
Hmmm... how can the value of lives be "infinite" when there are always
people looking at ways of doing safety on the cheap?...
Regards,
BB.
|
Wanna put a price on yours?
Coop
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Coop Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 2:44 pm Post subject: Re: Affordable Safety |
|
|
BB wrote:
| Quote: |
Tailspin wrote:
Here's another one for you to think about.
"Tombstone Maintenance"
Work out what it costs to do the maintenance or modification and compare
that to what the insurance cost is if the "bus" goes in.
If the insurance is cheaper don't do the maintenance jus pay the insurance
and take the risk.
Another book I suggest people read is "The Naked Pilot - Human Factors
in Aircraft Accidents" by David Beaty... Despite what the title reads
it is about more than pilots... There is a chapter in this book with
that title...
Regards,
BB.
|
Can't see it in my copy (1995) is there another edition? Which chapter
were you referring to?
Coop
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Graeme Hogan Guest
|
Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 8:34 am Post subject: Re: Affordable Safety |
|
|
"SR20GOER" <sr20goerDONTSPAM (AT) ozipilotsonline (DOT) com.au> wrote
| Quote: | Graeme
Most RPT buses have two fans minimum and a higher level of redundant
safety
factor.
|
I was being funny.
I used to be a bus driver.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SR20GOER Guest
|
Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 9:39 am Post subject: Re: Affordable Safety |
|
|
Graeme
Gotcher. I'm still new on this group and yet to catch up with "who's who in
this zoo".
Unfortunately if maintenance goes the way CASA tried with the latest NPRM it
will only be via the big factories who can dedicate half the staff to
paperwork which as we all know is what keeps aircraft airborne. The concept
that I as a pilot with a mechanical background would need training to
undertake even basic GA pilot maintenance is too funny to be serious. Also
obviously means that the CASA syllabus and the competency based training
must have churned out many dangerous pilots by their reasoning. Doesn't
show up in the accident stats but since when should data influence
reasoning.
I stay off the buses - I'm a front seat phreak.
"Graeme Hogan" <ghogan01 (AT) optusnet (DOT) com.au> wrote
| Quote: |
"SR20GOER" <sr20goerDONTSPAM (AT) ozipilotsonline (DOT) com.au> wrote in message
news:42acb0dc$0$14475$5a62ac22 (AT) per-qv1-newsreader-01 (DOT) iinet.net.au...
Graeme
Most RPT buses have two fans minimum and a higher level of redundant
safety
factor.
I was being funny.
I used to be a bus driver.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JB Guest
|
Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 10:40 am Post subject: Re: Affordable Safety |
|
|
"SR20GOER" <sr20goerDONTSPAM (AT) ozipilotsonline (DOT) com.au> wrote
| Quote: |
I stay off the buses - I'm a front seat phreak.
|
Good....they're occupied.
JB
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BB Guest
|
Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 11:39 am Post subject: Re: Affordable Safety |
|
|
Coop wrote:
| Quote: |
Can't see it in my copy (1995) is there another edition? Which chapter
were you referring to?
Coop
|
Yeah... you're right, Coop... I guess that's what happens when you post
without checking... Try "Black Box - Why Air Safety is No Accident" by
Nicholas Faith....
Regards,
BB.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|