AirTalk.org Forum Index AirTalk.org
Aviation discussions newsgroups
 
Archives   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Affordable Safety
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AirTalk.org Forum Index -> Planes, gliders and flying in Australia
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Coop
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 6:49 am    Post subject: Affordable Safety Reply with quote



Stumbled across this definition of "affordable safety"

"All lives have equal value and that value is infinite. This means that
because the Australian people only have a finite amount of money to
spend on such issues as air safety, objectively based scientific risk
analysis must be used to allocate the dollars so the maximum number of
lives are saved."

Not surprisingly, found this on DS's website:

http://www.dicksmithflyer.com.au/Content.php?ContentID=370

Coop

Back to top
SR20GOER
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 7:28 am    Post subject: Re: Affordable Safety Reply with quote



I do not disagree with the philosophy, however I need to reflect on the
implementation.

A private pilot flying a high performance single takes and expects a
different level of risk, and creation and control of that risk, to that of a
RPT passenger expecting to get on the "bus", ignore the safety brief, and
get off safely at the other end without spilling the coffee in flight.

I guess the scientific analysis needs a fairly broad base of factors.

"Coop" <vhbdq (AT) chariotnose (DOT) netwheel.au> wrote

Quote:
Stumbled across this definition of "affordable safety"

"All lives have equal value and that value is infinite. This means that
because the Australian people only have a finite amount of money to spend
on such issues as air safety, objectively based scientific risk analysis
must be used to allocate the dollars so the maximum number of lives are
saved."

Not surprisingly, found this on DS's website:

http://www.dicksmithflyer.com.au/Content.php?ContentID=370

Coop




Back to top
BB
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 8:33 am    Post subject: Re: Affordable Safety Reply with quote





Coop wrote:
Quote:
Stumbled across this definition of "affordable safety"

"All lives have equal value and that value is infinite. This means that
because the Australian people only have a finite amount of money to
spend on such issues as air safety, objectively based scientific risk
analysis must be used to allocate the dollars so the maximum number of
lives are saved."

Not surprisingly, found this on DS's website:

http://www.dicksmithflyer.com.au/Content.php?ContentID=370



Hmmm... how can the value of lives be "infinite" when there are always
people looking at ways of doing safety on the cheap?...


Regards,
BB.


Back to top
Tailspin
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 11:11 am    Post subject: Re: Affordable Safety Reply with quote

Here's another one for you to think about.

"Tombstone Maintenance"

Work out what it costs to do the maintenance or modification and compare
that to what the insurance cost is if the "bus" goes in.

If the insurance is cheaper don't do the maintenance jus pay the insurance
and take the risk.
"Coop" <vhbdq (AT) chariotnose (DOT) netwheel.au> wrote

Quote:
Stumbled across this definition of "affordable safety"

"All lives have equal value and that value is infinite. This means that
because the Australian people only have a finite amount of money to spend
on such issues as air safety, objectively based scientific risk analysis
must be used to allocate the dollars so the maximum number of lives are
saved."

Not surprisingly, found this on DS's website:

http://www.dicksmithflyer.com.au/Content.php?ContentID=370

Coop




Back to top
Graeme Hogan
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 11:12 am    Post subject: Re: Affordable Safety Reply with quote


"SR20GOER" <sr20goerDONTSPAM (AT) ozipilotsonline (DOT) com.au> wrote

Quote:
I do not disagree with the philosophy, however I need to reflect on the
implementation.

A private pilot flying a high performance single takes and expects a
different level of risk, and creation and control of that risk, to that of
a
RPT passenger expecting to get on the "bus", ignore the safety brief, and
get off safely at the other end without spilling the coffee in flight.


But what if I'm the bus driver ?.




Back to top
BB
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 11:21 am    Post subject: Re: Affordable Safety Reply with quote



Tailspin wrote:
Quote:
Here's another one for you to think about.

"Tombstone Maintenance"

Work out what it costs to do the maintenance or modification and compare
that to what the insurance cost is if the "bus" goes in.

If the insurance is cheaper don't do the maintenance jus pay the insurance
and take the risk.


Another book I suggest people read is "The Naked Pilot - Human Factors
in Aircraft Accidents" by David Beaty... Despite what the title reads
it is about more than pilots... There is a chapter in this book with
that title...


Regards,
BB.


Back to top
SR20GOER
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 10:02 pm    Post subject: Re: Affordable Safety Reply with quote

Graeme
Most RPT buses have two fans minimum and a higher level of redundant safety
factor.

Think of a PPL in a single at night - even worse over water or tiger country
and taking the direct route - and I still believe it's a higher level of
risk.
Also, training wise, the bus driver is CPL or higher.
Not to say the bus driver does not have worries, but I'm talking
comparative.

"Graeme Hogan" <ghogan01 (AT) optusnet (DOT) com.au> wrote

Quote:

"SR20GOER" <sr20goerDONTSPAM (AT) ozipilotsonline (DOT) com.au> wrote in message
news:42abe40e$0$14478$5a62ac22 (AT) per-qv1-newsreader-01 (DOT) iinet.net.au...
I do not disagree with the philosophy, however I need to reflect on the
implementation.

A private pilot flying a high performance single takes and expects a
different level of risk, and creation and control of that risk, to that
of
a
RPT passenger expecting to get on the "bus", ignore the safety brief, and
get off safely at the other end without spilling the coffee in flight.


But what if I'm the bus driver ?.






Back to top
ventus45@hotmail.com
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jun 13, 2005 1:43 pm    Post subject: Re: Affordable Safety Reply with quote

Graeme Hogan wrote:
But what if I'm the bus driver ?.

They are only interested in the safety of the fare paying pax, not the
hired help, or anyone else.

Back to top
Coop
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 2:43 pm    Post subject: Re: Affordable Safety Reply with quote

SR20GOER wrote:

Quote:
I do not disagree with the philosophy, however I need to reflect on the
implementation.

A private pilot flying a high performance single takes and expects a
different level of risk, and creation and control of that risk, to that of a
RPT passenger expecting to get on the "bus", ignore the safety brief, and
get off safely at the other end without spilling the coffee in flight.

I guess the scientific analysis needs a fairly broad base of factors.


I'm inclined to agree- one accident in GA might mean one life lost. One
accident in RPT usually means many lives lost. Not hard to see where the
focus is needed.

Coop


Quote:

"Coop" <vhbdq (AT) chariotnose (DOT) netwheel.au> wrote in message
news:42ABDAF1.1000704 (AT) chariotnose (DOT) netwheel.au...

Stumbled across this definition of "affordable safety"

"All lives have equal value and that value is infinite. This means that
because the Australian people only have a finite amount of money to spend
on such issues as air safety, objectively based scientific risk analysis
must be used to allocate the dollars so the maximum number of lives are
saved."

Not surprisingly, found this on DS's website:

http://www.dicksmithflyer.com.au/Content.php?ContentID=370

Coop







Back to top
Coop
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 2:44 pm    Post subject: Re: Affordable Safety Reply with quote

BB wrote:

Quote:

Coop wrote:

Stumbled across this definition of "affordable safety"

"All lives have equal value and that value is infinite. This means that
because the Australian people only have a finite amount of money to
spend on such issues as air safety, objectively based scientific risk
analysis must be used to allocate the dollars so the maximum number of
lives are saved."

Not surprisingly, found this on DS's website:

http://www.dicksmithflyer.com.au/Content.php?ContentID=370




Hmmm... how can the value of lives be "infinite" when there are always
people looking at ways of doing safety on the cheap?...


Regards,
BB.



Wanna put a price on yours?

Coop


Back to top
Coop
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 2:44 pm    Post subject: Re: Affordable Safety Reply with quote

BB wrote:

Quote:

Tailspin wrote:

Here's another one for you to think about.

"Tombstone Maintenance"

Work out what it costs to do the maintenance or modification and compare
that to what the insurance cost is if the "bus" goes in.

If the insurance is cheaper don't do the maintenance jus pay the insurance
and take the risk.



Another book I suggest people read is "The Naked Pilot - Human Factors
in Aircraft Accidents" by David Beaty... Despite what the title reads
it is about more than pilots... There is a chapter in this book with
that title...


Regards,
BB.



Can't see it in my copy (1995) is there another edition? Which chapter
were you referring to?

Coop


Back to top
Graeme Hogan
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 8:34 am    Post subject: Re: Affordable Safety Reply with quote


"SR20GOER" <sr20goerDONTSPAM (AT) ozipilotsonline (DOT) com.au> wrote

Quote:
Graeme
Most RPT buses have two fans minimum and a higher level of redundant
safety
factor.


I was being funny.
I used to be a bus driver.




Back to top
SR20GOER
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 9:39 am    Post subject: Re: Affordable Safety Reply with quote

Graeme
Gotcher. I'm still new on this group and yet to catch up with "who's who in
this zoo".

Unfortunately if maintenance goes the way CASA tried with the latest NPRM it
will only be via the big factories who can dedicate half the staff to
paperwork which as we all know is what keeps aircraft airborne. The concept
that I as a pilot with a mechanical background would need training to
undertake even basic GA pilot maintenance is too funny to be serious. Also
obviously means that the CASA syllabus and the competency based training
must have churned out many dangerous pilots by their reasoning. Doesn't
show up in the accident stats but since when should data influence
reasoning.

I stay off the buses - I'm a front seat phreak.

"Graeme Hogan" <ghogan01 (AT) optusnet (DOT) com.au> wrote

Quote:

"SR20GOER" <sr20goerDONTSPAM (AT) ozipilotsonline (DOT) com.au> wrote in message
news:42acb0dc$0$14475$5a62ac22 (AT) per-qv1-newsreader-01 (DOT) iinet.net.au...
Graeme
Most RPT buses have two fans minimum and a higher level of redundant
safety
factor.


I was being funny.
I used to be a bus driver.






Back to top
JB
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 10:40 am    Post subject: Re: Affordable Safety Reply with quote


"SR20GOER" <sr20goerDONTSPAM (AT) ozipilotsonline (DOT) com.au> wrote

Quote:

I stay off the buses - I'm a front seat phreak.


Good....they're occupied.

JB



Back to top
BB
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 11:39 am    Post subject: Re: Affordable Safety Reply with quote



Coop wrote:

Quote:

Can't see it in my copy (1995) is there another edition? Which chapter
were you referring to?

Coop


Yeah... you're right, Coop... I guess that's what happens when you post
without checking... Try "Black Box - Why Air Safety is No Accident" by
Nicholas Faith....


Regards,
BB.


Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AirTalk.org Forum Index -> Planes, gliders and flying in Australia All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2006 phpBB Group
SEO toolkit © 2004-2006 webmedic.