 |
AirTalk.org Aviation discussions newsgroups
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
edcook24 Guest
|
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2005 6:32 am Post subject: Aerobatics before PPL?? |
|
|
I'm up to Navex 3 (8 months ago)at RVAC, Moorabbin and I've run low on
cash. I'm toying with the idea of gaining an Aerobatics rating to
improve my flying skills (and keep costs down) rather than continue
with the Navs as I can only afford one every two months, what are
peoples views on this idea?
--
edcook24
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted via OziPilots Online [ http://www.OziPilotsOnline.com.au ]
- A website for Australian Pilots regardless of when, why, or what they fly -
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mozart Guest
|
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2005 7:21 am Post subject: Re: Aerobatics before PPL?? |
|
|
| Quote: | "edcook24" wrote:
I'm up to Navex 3 (8 months ago)at RVAC, Moorabbin and I've run low on
cash. I'm toying with the idea of gaining an Aerobatics rating to
improve my flying skills (and keep costs down) rather than continue
with the Navs as I can only afford one every two months, what are
peoples views on this idea?
|
Hello. One NAVEX every two months means that the beginning of each exercise
is spent revising all your previous sequences, so it's unlikely you're
performing as well as you would if you were flying, say, once a week. I
wouldn't recommend conducting your training like this. Nav training only
consists of a short number of navs which, ideally, should be flown within a
three-week block to ensure you get the most out of them. Continuity of
training is really important for ALL your elementary training because there
is simply so much to learn (and forget). Sure, you can leave flights two
months apart, or even 6 months apart, but it's likely to cost you more in
flying time (and knowledge) long-term.
I think you answered your own question. If you're flying irregularly
aerobatics is a fantastic option. It will improve your flying skills to no
end, it will cost you less and will keep your flying current so when you do
cash up for nav training, the last thing that will hold you back is basic
handling skills.
Have a talk to your CFI or instructor.
Good luck.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bernie Samms Guest
|
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2005 10:25 am Post subject: Re: Aerobatics before PPL?? |
|
|
Agree in spades. Its not easy to build your nav skills every 8 weeks or so.
Have a bit of fun and save!!! Then you can get that PPL much easier and
probably not that much slower.
--
Bernie Samms
Kingston Beach Tasmania
Aero Club of Southern Tasmania www.acst.com.au
Prologic Pty Ltd www.prologic.com.au
Out Mail has been checked by Norton Anti Virus but no absolute guarantee is
made that mail or attachment(s) are virus free.
"Mozart" <nil> wrote
| Quote: | "edcook24" wrote:
I'm up to Navex 3 (8 months ago)at RVAC, Moorabbin and I've run low on
cash. I'm toying with the idea of gaining an Aerobatics rating to
improve my flying skills (and keep costs down) rather than continue
with the Navs as I can only afford one every two months, what are
peoples views on this idea?
Hello. One NAVEX every two months means that the beginning of each
exercise
is spent revising all your previous sequences, so it's unlikely you're
performing as well as you would if you were flying, say, once a week. I
wouldn't recommend conducting your training like this. Nav training only
consists of a short number of navs which, ideally, should be flown within
a
three-week block to ensure you get the most out of them. Continuity of
training is really important for ALL your elementary training because
there
is simply so much to learn (and forget). Sure, you can leave flights two
months apart, or even 6 months apart, but it's likely to cost you more in
flying time (and knowledge) long-term.
I think you answered your own question. If you're flying irregularly
aerobatics is a fantastic option. It will improve your flying skills to no
end, it will cost you less and will keep your flying current so when you
do
cash up for nav training, the last thing that will hold you back is basic
handling skills.
Have a talk to your CFI or instructor.
Good luck.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Stealth Pilot Guest
|
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2005 9:24 pm Post subject: Re: Aerobatics before PPL?? |
|
|
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 18:21:48 +1100, "Mozart" <nil> wrote:
| Quote: | "edcook24" wrote:
I'm up to Navex 3 (8 months ago)at RVAC, Moorabbin and I've run low on
cash. I'm toying with the idea of gaining an Aerobatics rating to
improve my flying skills (and keep costs down) rather than continue
with the Navs as I can only afford one every two months, what are
peoples views on this idea?
Hello. One NAVEX every two months means that the beginning of each exercise
is spent revising all your previous sequences, so it's unlikely you're
performing as well as you would if you were flying, say, once a week. I
wouldn't recommend conducting your training like this. Nav training only
consists of a short number of navs which, ideally, should be flown within a
three-week block to ensure you get the most out of them. Continuity of
training is really important for ALL your elementary training because there
is simply so much to learn (and forget). Sure, you can leave flights two
months apart, or even 6 months apart, but it's likely to cost you more in
flying time (and knowledge) long-term.
I think you answered your own question. If you're flying irregularly
aerobatics is a fantastic option. It will improve your flying skills to no
end, it will cost you less and will keep your flying current so when you do
cash up for nav training, the last thing that will hold you back is basic
handling skills.
Have a talk to your CFI or instructor.
Good luck.
no wonder young guys end up with no pilots licence after spending |
thousands on flight training.
my son has over 120 hours and no licence (yet) because he followed
this stupid advice.
focus on the target. the target is to get your qualifications and
experience consolidated into a perpetually valid licence.
you have a gfpt so you can fly in the training area to keep up the
skills. just do a half hour flight in the circuit every fortnight and
save up for the navs.
being sucked into an aerobatics endorsement is something that the
aeroclubs seem to use as a national strategy. keep the kid unqualified
and he will have to come back to us to fly. must be worth thousands a
pilot to the scum suckers. (apologies unintended)
FOCUS ON COMPLETING YOUR NAVS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
you only have
Stealth Pilot
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lozza Guest
|
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2005 10:45 pm Post subject: Re: Aerobatics before PPL?? |
|
|
Stealth Pilot wrote:
| Quote: | On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 18:21:48 +1100, "Mozart" <nil> wrote:
"edcook24" wrote:
I'm up to Navex 3 (8 months ago)at RVAC, Moorabbin and I've run
low on
cash. I'm toying with the idea of gaining an Aerobatics rating to
improve my flying skills (and keep costs down) rather than
continue
with the Navs as I can only afford one every two months, what are
peoples views on this idea?
Hello. One NAVEX every two months means that the beginning of each
exercise
is spent revising all your previous sequences, so it's unlikely
you're
performing as well as you would if you were flying, say, once a
week. I
wouldn't recommend conducting your training like this. Nav training
only
consists of a short number of navs which, ideally, should be flown
within a
three-week block to ensure you get the most out of them. Continuity
of
training is really important for ALL your elementary training
because there
is simply so much to learn (and forget). Sure, you can leave flights
two
months apart, or even 6 months apart, but it's likely to cost you
more in
flying time (and knowledge) long-term.
I think you answered your own question. If you're flying irregularly
aerobatics is a fantastic option. It will improve your flying skills
to no
end, it will cost you less and will keep your flying current so when
you do
cash up for nav training, the last thing that will hold you back is
basic
handling skills.
Have a talk to your CFI or instructor.
Good luck.
no wonder young guys end up with no pilots licence after spending
thousands on flight training.
my son has over 120 hours and no licence (yet) because he followed
this stupid advice.
focus on the target. the target is to get your qualifications and
experience consolidated into a perpetually valid licence.
you have a gfpt so you can fly in the training area to keep up the
skills. just do a half hour flight in the circuit every fortnight and
save up for the navs.
being sucked into an aerobatics endorsement is something that the
aeroclubs seem to use as a national strategy. keep the kid
unqualified
and he will have to come back to us to fly. must be worth thousands a
pilot to the scum suckers. (apologies unintended)
FOCUS ON COMPLETING YOUR NAVS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
you only have
Stealth Pilot
|
I agree with all the above,especially with training area flights,
currency saves cash in handfulls.Due to work & financial commitments I
have postponed my navs untill I can do them all in one block of
time.However I did complete an emergency manoeuvre training course with
action aerobatics which taught me more about what makes a plane fly
than all the books and hours to gfpt put together.A well spent 1500 odd
dollars in my book.
Laurie
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GO BLUZ Guest
|
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2005 11:18 pm Post subject: Re: Aerobatics before PPL?? |
|
|
Dont you need a PPL before you can do any endorsements?
"lozza" <laurie.dempsey (AT) hunterlink (DOT) net.au> wrote
| Quote: |
Stealth Pilot wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 18:21:48 +1100, "Mozart" <nil> wrote:
"edcook24" wrote:
I'm up to Navex 3 (8 months ago)at RVAC, Moorabbin and I've run
low on
cash. I'm toying with the idea of gaining an Aerobatics rating to
improve my flying skills (and keep costs down) rather than
continue
with the Navs as I can only afford one every two months, what are
peoples views on this idea?
Hello. One NAVEX every two months means that the beginning of each
exercise
is spent revising all your previous sequences, so it's unlikely
you're
performing as well as you would if you were flying, say, once a
week. I
wouldn't recommend conducting your training like this. Nav training
only
consists of a short number of navs which, ideally, should be flown
within a
three-week block to ensure you get the most out of them. Continuity
of
training is really important for ALL your elementary training
because there
is simply so much to learn (and forget). Sure, you can leave flights
two
months apart, or even 6 months apart, but it's likely to cost you
more in
flying time (and knowledge) long-term.
I think you answered your own question. If you're flying irregularly
aerobatics is a fantastic option. It will improve your flying skills
to no
end, it will cost you less and will keep your flying current so when
you do
cash up for nav training, the last thing that will hold you back is
basic
handling skills.
Have a talk to your CFI or instructor.
Good luck.
no wonder young guys end up with no pilots licence after spending
thousands on flight training.
my son has over 120 hours and no licence (yet) because he followed
this stupid advice.
focus on the target. the target is to get your qualifications and
experience consolidated into a perpetually valid licence.
you have a gfpt so you can fly in the training area to keep up the
skills. just do a half hour flight in the circuit every fortnight and
save up for the navs.
being sucked into an aerobatics endorsement is something that the
aeroclubs seem to use as a national strategy. keep the kid
unqualified
and he will have to come back to us to fly. must be worth thousands a
pilot to the scum suckers. (apologies unintended)
FOCUS ON COMPLETING YOUR NAVS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
you only have
Stealth Pilot
I agree with all the above,especially with training area flights,
currency saves cash in handfulls.Due to work & financial commitments I
have postponed my navs untill I can do them all in one block of
time.However I did complete an emergency manoeuvre training course with
action aerobatics which taught me more about what makes a plane fly
than all the books and hours to gfpt put together.A well spent 1500 odd
dollars in my book.
Laurie
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mozart Guest
|
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2005 11:35 pm Post subject: Re: Aerobatics before PPL?? |
|
|
| Quote: | "GO BLUZ" wrote:
Dont you need a PPL before you can do any endorsements?
|
Aerobatics isn't an 'endorsement'. It's simply a log book authorisation to
permit certain manouvers.
Refer: Para. 2.4 http://www.casa.gov.au/download/orders/cao40/4000.pdf
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mozart Guest
|
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2005 11:38 pm Post subject: Re: Aerobatics before PPL?? |
|
|
DO'H. My apologies for spelling of "manoeuvres". Can't believe I did that...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
paulsims Guest
|
Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2005 1:02 am Post subject: Re: Aerobatics before PPL?? |
|
|
I agree with the guys above, do short flights every couple of weeks to
stay current and save up for your full PPL.
I also trained at Moorabbin, but founs I ended up with stacks of hours
logged but no PPL.
So I saved up the cash, then spent 10 days away on holiday where I flew
with the Wangarrata Aero Club every day doing navs, and within 2 weeks
had my PPL.
Greg the CFI at Wangarrata is great to fly with, and I learnt more
about flying with him than in 100 hours of previous flying at YMMB.
We flow in both good and marginal weather so you soon learn limits and
increase your judgement on when and where to fly.
Good luck with your flying, but this was a great way to learn.
Cheers Paul.
--
paulsims
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted via OziPilots Online [ http://www.OziPilotsOnline.com.au ]
- A website for Australian Pilots regardless of when, why, or what they fly -
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Peter Tebbutt Guest
|
Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2005 7:50 am Post subject: Re: Aerobatics before PPL?? |
|
|
| Quote: | as I can only afford one every two months, what are
peoples views on this idea?
|
Don't I know how you feel!
I bought a farm back when I did my restricted ppl, and didn't finish the
navs.... A dozen years later, I've saved up enough to stop the bank manager
writing those dirty letters,and I'm back flying finally, with an old
ultralight instructor that has done all sorts of bush flying. He's teaching
me all sorts of cool flying skills that are improving my flying much more
than just doing a few navs. Have a look at his daughter's website which
gives a run down on both her father, and her man as well.
http://www.aeros.com.au/
I'll be doing a few lessons in how to fly upside down with Mal later, who
will also be finalising my ppl and signing off the navs.
But for now, the level of skill I am gaining in handling an aircraft on the
ground and very close to the ground, and love having an experienced pilot
teaching me so much more than I had ever even dreamed about. The difference
between a light aircraft on a bush strip with NO inertia, and driving a C172
bus on the freeway is teaching me how to handle the beast and the air!
Go out and find the crankiest old bugger you can, and get him to teach you
to fly!
Hope this helps,
Peter
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KMH Guest
|
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2005 10:24 pm Post subject: Re: Aerobatics before PPL?? |
|
|
Definitely Ed! I think basic aeros should be an integral part of flight
training. Your flying skills will improve immensely and you'll stay current
until you can afford to finish your navs.
Mal
"edcook24" <edcook24 (AT) REMOVETHISOziPilotsOnline (DOT) com.au> wrote
| Quote: |
I'm up to Navex 3 (8 months ago)at RVAC, Moorabbin and I've run low on
cash. I'm toying with the idea of gaining an Aerobatics rating to
improve my flying skills (and keep costs down) rather than continue
with the Navs as I can only afford one every two months, what are
peoples views on this idea?
--
edcook24
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted via OziPilots Online [ http://www.OziPilotsOnline.com.au ]
- A website for Australian Pilots regardless of when, why, or what they
fly -
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
edcook24 Guest
|
Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2005 5:13 am Post subject: Re: Aerobatics before PPL?? |
|
|
Thanks to everyone who has responded with such valuable advice, very
useful.
--
edcook24
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted via OziPilots Online [ http://www.OziPilotsOnline.com.au ]
- A website for Australian Pilots regardless of when, why, or what they fly -
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Non Compis Mentis Guest
|
Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2005 10:08 am Post subject: Re: Aerobatics before PPL?? |
|
|
Read all the previous posts...
Agree that you should keep current doing solos, etc. etc.and focus on
getting the Navs done, because the YMMB training area does get tiresome
after a while (well, when you're restricted to it, anyway).
BUT, I chose to do some aerobatics (loops, rolls, spins, hammerheads)
immediately after GFPT for two reasons:
1. It was great fun.
2. It taught me a lot more about flying than all the Navs and gave me a
bit more confidence and respect of flying.
I'd recommend it for reason 2, alone, but realise, it will eat into your
cash that could be saved for doing your navs, further postponing your
them and your PPL. So, unless you have reasons for doing it, keeping
current is a lot cheaper and you can practice some manouvres they will
ask of you during your PPL test.
NCM.
edcook24 wrote:
| Quote: | I'm up to Navex 3 (8 months ago)at RVAC, Moorabbin and I've run low on
cash. I'm toying with the idea of gaining an Aerobatics rating to
improve my flying skills (and keep costs down) rather than continue
with the Navs as I can only afford one every two months, what are
peoples views on this idea?
--
edcook24
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted via OziPilots Online [ http://www.OziPilotsOnline.com.au ]
- A website for Australian Pilots regardless of when, why, or what they fly -
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lozza Guest
|
Posted: Sun Jan 23, 2005 1:18 am Post subject: Re: Aerobatics before PPL?? |
|
|
edcook24 wrote:
| Quote: | Thanks to everyone who has responded with such valuable advice, very
useful.
--
edcook24
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted via OziPilots Online [ http://www.OziPilotsOnline.com.au ]
- A website for Australian Pilots regardless of when, why, or what
they fly - |
Good to see so many pilots keen to venture beyond straight & level!
If you are still keen to go the aero route I still recommend emt as in
my last response.I know it's a mandatary starting point before basic
aerobatics with Action Aerobatics, I don't know what the others do.
What you will learn is "what happens if I skid or slip in a climbing
,decending,level turn?What does a spin feel like?What will I do if I
inadvertently find myself upside down?" Invaluable knowledge IMHO,as
well as a hell of a lot of fun.
Happy flying
Laurie
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|